Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
Library or police, a small town’s struggle puts a spotlight on library inequities across California
It is the most obvious and important contributor to student success and yet something many California school districts are not doing well: getting students to show up for school.
More than 1 in 10 students statewide were chronically absent from school in 2017-18, meaning they missed at least 10 percent of the school year, according to recent data released by the California Department of Education.
“The numbers are bad and getting slightly worse,” said Rob Manwaring, a senior education policy advisor for Children Now, a statewide child advocacy organization. He is referring to the fact that the statewide rate rose to 11.1 percent from 10.8 percent in 2016-17, the first year the state released the numbers.
Chronic absenteeism is “where the school to prison pipeline starts,” Manwaring said. “It’s where you can address a problem before it becomes a crisis.”
While Manwaring and other advocates have long pushed for more attention to the issue, there is greater urgency this year as the state for the first time has set chronic absenteeism as one of the indicators districts will be rated on to gauge how successfully they are serving their students. There is also hope that it will be among the focal points of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s vision for a “cradle-to-career” education system.
Missing as much as 10 percent of the school year, or approximately 18 days, can have adverse consequences for a child as early as kindergarten. A significant body of research shows students with high rates of absenteeism are less likely to be able to read at grade level by the end of the 3rd grade, are more likely to drop out in high school and are less successful in college.
In California, rates for several racial and ethnic student groups — including Native Americans, African-Americans and Pacific Islanders — were significantly higher than the statewide rate. Meanwhile, rates for Latinos, whites, Asians and Filipinos were just above or below the state average.
“The group that jumped out to me as the biggest concern is African-Americans,” Manwaring said, referring both to their large numbers in many districts and high absenteeism rates. “One out of every five African-American kids is chronically absent. That is scary.”
Manwaring said the picture becomes even bleaker when you dig deeper into the data and see the rates for other subgroups, including foster youth, homeless youth and students with disabilities:
State officials and advocates expect districts to start working harder to bring the numbers down now that chronic absenteeism in grades K-8 is a statewide indicator on the California School Dashboard, the state’s color-coded report card for districts and individual schools.
As with other dashboard indicators (like test scores and suspension rates) districts and schools are assigned a color based on their absenteeism rates. Orange and red mean “high” or “very high” rates, respectively.
A district or school has high chronic absenteeism if between 10 and 20 percent of its students miss 18 or more days, under the criteria approved late last year by the State Board of Education. The state considers very high rates to be 20 percent or more.
Based on these breakdowns, approximately 30 percent of districts have high absenteeism rates through the 8th grade and an additional 10 percent have very high rates. Considerably more districts would have high and very high rates if high schools were included in the dashboard tally.
The State Board of Education excluded high schools because graduation rates are already one of the main statewide indicators and board members felt that since attendance factors heavily into graduation rates it would be redundant to also include absenteeism for high schools. This decision has drawn criticism from youth advocates who point to the fact that high school students are significantly more likely to be chronically absent than students in lower grades.
This argument aside, state officials and youth advocates agree that from now on districts will be paying more attention to their absenteeism rates at all grade levels because they are a key part of the dashboard.
“With the dashboard going public we’ll have a lot of supervisors of attendance motivated to change” the color they receive on the dashboard, said David Kopperud, chairman of the state School Attendance Review Board. “It’s a wake-up call.”
In addition to maintaining accurate attendance records, a district’s supervisor of attendance is also responsible for developing programs that incentivize students to come to school, working with the parents of students who are chronically absent to improve their attendance and, in extreme cases, reporting chronically absent students to their local attendance review board.
Kopperud said beyond the dashboard there are a couple of statewide model programs designed to help districts lower their chronic absenteeism numbers. One is an effort to promote improved training for attendance supervisors so they can better address the myriad factors that contribute to chronic absenteeism, he said. All districts with at least 1,000 students are required to employ an attendance supervisor.
Another is a model attendance recognition program for schools that replaces schools’ “perfect attendance” awards with incentives that will also motivate students who’ve had poor attendance. In one such program schools identify days throughout the year in which all students who show up to school receive an award, but students don’t know which days will be attendance award days, Kopperud said.
But both Kopperud and the advocates are quick to acknowledge that combating chronic absenteeism requires much more than trained attendance supervisors and revamped awards.
“I know improvements can be made, the question is how fast,” said Hedy Nai-Lin Chang, executive director of San Francisco-based Attendance Works, which is among the leading advocates nationwide for improving school attendance. “It can’t be done in the same way as ‘Thou shalt not suspend kids.’”
Chang is referring to a state law passed in 2014 that banned suspensions in grades K-3 for behaviors that are deemed disruptive or defiant, but not dangerous. As a result of the new law, and policy changes by districts, suspensions have dropped significantly statewide over the past half-decade.
Absenteeism requires a broader, multi-dimensional approach. Districts must take into account not only the students themselves but also where they live, their family’s cultural history and opinion toward school and the trauma they’ve experienced.
“It may take a few years” for the numbers to improve, Manwaring said. “My hope for this year is districts feel some urgency to address it and start to figure out what is going wrong and what can be done about it.”
The system has enrolled more in-state residents, but not enough to meet targets set by the state.
Two prominent organizations say the proposal would dismantle progress made to improve reading instruction for those students.
Fresno City College professor Tom Boroujeni is unable to fulfill his duties as academic senate president while on leave, the latest update reads.
This is a continuing EdSource series on proven innovations in higher education that relate to the problems facing California’s higher education systems.
Comments (9)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Ruby 5 years ago5 years ago
Of course absenteeism is on the rise. There are no real consequences for these students! Instead they are being awarded for little improvements which is not the same if you put these kids in the same situation!
Jasmine Martinez 5 years ago5 years ago
I feel this is possibly happening more and even in my own household because of the economy. I have become a single parent in the last few years and it's been a struggle. We don't live the quality of life we did before when we could afford to eat healthier. I don't have a second parent in the home to stay with the kids when they're sick or when I'm sick; … Read More
I feel this is possibly happening more and even in my own household because of the economy. I have become a single parent in the last few years and it’s been a struggle. We don’t live the quality of life we did before when we could afford to eat healthier.
I don’t have a second parent in the home to stay with the kids when they’re sick or when I’m sick; can I take the kids to school if I’m not well enough to drive?
Then there’s the no friends or family support factor. It’s definitely a struggle, and depression can play a role and affect your overall health and well being. The kids struggle with the high common core standards as well; it gets to be very overwhelming.
Then there’s bullying that seems to be happening more and more and now even more with and on social media. Our children are under a lot of stress and possibly get sick more often because of it.
I don’t remember ever getting that sick as a child compared to children now nor did I feel as stressed about school and society.
George Hung 5 years ago5 years ago
Again, what are Asian parents doing right? Everyone may have an opinion as to why Asian students are attending classes and behaving but until the deep dive is completed, it is only speculation. It is for the benefit of public education and society to understand values, priorities and behaviors of Asian parents.
el 5 years ago5 years ago
I suspect the causes here are many. One thing I want to say that I think is super important is that high absenteeism is *correlated* with bad outcomes, but that does not mean it is *causal.* For example, maybe it's not surprising that students with disabilities - who are generally in fragile health and have more than their share of medical appointments - miss a lot of school. And if that's why their rate is … Read More
I suspect the causes here are many.
One thing I want to say that I think is super important is that high absenteeism is *correlated* with bad outcomes, but that does not mean it is *causal.* For example, maybe it’s not surprising that students with disabilities – who are generally in fragile health and have more than their share of medical appointments – miss a lot of school. And if that’s why their rate is high, it’s not clear that getting them to school more often for more “butt in seat” time would actually be helpful to their outcomes.
I wonder how much of the absenteeism rate for foster youth is about the needs of various adults and the system? I’m not sure laying that on the schools is the right source of corrective action.
We should probably break out rural vs. urban too and talk a little about why the disparity that I understand exists is a factor there. Simply being far from places means kids miss more school time. (I’m still angry about the sign I once saw in an orthodontist office about “please don’t expect afterschool appointments” … and this in an area where some of their patients were probably an hour or more from the office in commute time.)
There are certainly kids for whom it is causal and who do need to be getting to school every day and to a program that works for them. Some may need access to counseling, or a different program, or may benefit from some saber rattling. I just don’t think it’s one size, or one solution, fits all. It’s a situation that needs a lot of different tools, more than most schools usually have at hand.
Daniel Plonsey 5 years ago5 years ago
At my high school, Berkeley High, there is an epidemic of anxiety and depression, which is leading to higher rates of absenteeism. My own son has missed many days this year because of anxiety. The increase in inequality nationally and locally have a lot to do with this, as does a society in which K-12 education is being reduced to the means for getting into a "good" college. Low income kids recognize the decrease in … Read More
At my high school, Berkeley High, there is an epidemic of anxiety and depression, which is leading to higher rates of absenteeism. My own son has missed many days this year because of anxiety. The increase in inequality nationally and locally have a lot to do with this, as does a society in which K-12 education is being reduced to the means for getting into a “good” college. Low income kids recognize the decrease in opportunities, higher income kids sign up for too many AP classes in an effort to be competitive. And in the background, the US is in the hands of a madman.
Gregory Lin Lipford 5 years ago5 years ago
Not one word about the responsibilities of the student and the family. Also not much said about making the school day more relevant and pleasurable to students. Ultimately, it cannot be the districts responsibility to get students to show up. The state does not own students; attendance in a choice. I wish EdSouce were a little more skeptical of the assertions and presumptions of the education establishment.
Jennifer Del Bono 5 years ago5 years ago
I echo everything that David Kopperrud and Hedy Chang are sharing. We believe firmly that this is the new call for equity and an entry point for districts to address equity in their LCAPs utilizing the MTSS framework. Please see the presentation I gave a few weeks ago and will be presenting again in a few hours. I added a link to your article. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RdybRXzD1sw-MkwYn5RmkFL0giCkd1Ie3p-pgt4a2aI/edit#slide=id.p Please feel free to give me a call or email me … Read More
I echo everything that David Kopperrud and Hedy Chang are sharing. We believe firmly that this is the new call for equity and an entry point for districts to address equity in their LCAPs utilizing the MTSS framework.
Please see the presentation I gave a few weeks ago and will be presenting again in a few hours. I added a link to your article.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RdybRXzD1sw-MkwYn5RmkFL0giCkd1Ie3p-pgt4a2aI/edit#slide=id.p
Please feel free to give me a call or email me at 669-292-1261 or jennifer_delbono@sccoe.org.
Jennifer
Replies
Danielle Hinkle 5 years ago5 years ago
Hello Jennifer – I really enjoyed reviewing your PPT. Lots of great information on the importance of keeping kids (and families) connected and engaged in school. I am a Senior Director in Modesto, CA. We have high rates of chronic absenteeism and are continually working to address the issue.
Charles R Hoff 5 years ago5 years ago
What are the consequences for absenteeism? None! Where truancy is enforced this problem is quite diminished.
As usual we are unwilling to face the reality of irresponsible adults.