Black teachers: How to recruit them and make them stay
Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
Third grade students in California’s lowest performing schools are doing better at reading, thanks to the Elementary Literacy Support Block Grant funding and a new focus on curriculum materials based on the science of reading.
That funding focused on improving education for students primarily in the youngest classrooms (K-2), with a stated goal of having all students reading by third grade.
While many California districts that received grants have been praised for providing student support such as tutoring or after-school programming, they are still focused on K-3. None of them have developed a comprehensive plan to address illiteracy among the older grades.
The most recent National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) stated that 68% of fourth graders lack key literacy skills. In California, the latest assessment of student performance shows fewer than half of eighth graders are proficient in English language arts. Many of these tweens and teens still have reading skills between a first and fourth grade level.
With literacy instruction traditionally focused in elementary school, middle and high school teachers are unequipped to support more than half of the students in their class who don’t yet have the literacy skills to access grade level text. The core problem is twofold: Educators are not trained to teach structured literacy in secondary school, and they do not have the right content for their older students reading far below grade level.
As one eighth grade teacher said, “I came here expecting to teach literature, but I soon realized I had to learn how to teach literacy first.”
Today’s middle and high school curricula assume that students beyond the fourth grade no longer need to learn how to read — instead, they should be able to read to learn. The reality is that many cannot.
Without the phonics and fluency skills, or background knowledge to make meaning from text, how can students analyze things like the author’s purpose and point of view, or use primary sources to write historical essays, or lab reports?
Students who struggle with reading end up falling behind across all subjects — from social studies to science to math — contributing to increased dropout rates.
The second problem is a deep lack of age-appropriate “learn-to-read” books for tweens and teens.
We cannot support and empower adolescent readers when their only choices for practice are stories like Dr. Seuss’s “Hop on Pop.” While these books are on their reading level, they are misaligned entirely with their interests. The content is boring and juvenile, even embarrassing, to a sixth or 10th grader, and the characters are not representative of students’ range of diverse backgrounds and identities. As a result, these students become disengaged and often stop reading altogether. For effective literacy instruction, we need to provide students with engaging opportunities for meaningful practice.
So how do we extend literacy instruction beyond the third grade, systematically?
We can transform literacy and access if we apply the science of reading in a relevant way to older students. They can catch up, but to help them do so, we must meet them where they are: reengaging reluctant readers with texts they can read and want to read — books that reflect their identities and experiences — and help them discover the joy of reading.
Instead of holding students back in grade three, as some districts have proposed, let’s think about how to propel them forward, starting wherever they are.
●●●
Louise Baigelman is a former literacy teacher and CEO of Storyshares, a literacy organization dedicated to inspiring a love of reading across the globe.
The opinions in this commentary are those of the author. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.
Panelists discussed dual admission as a solution for easing the longstanding challenges in California’s transfer system.
A grassroots campaign recalled two members of the Orange Unified School District in an election that cost more than half a million dollars.
Legislation that would remove one of the last tests teachers are required to take to earn a credential in California passed the Senate Education Committee.
Part-time instructors, many who work for decades off the tenure track and at a lower pay rate, have been called “apprentices to nowhere.”
Comments (3)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Nina 3 months ago3 months ago
"The second problem is a deep lack of age-appropriate “learn-to-read” books for tweens and teens. We cannot support and empower adolescent readers when their only choices for practice are stories like Dr. Seuss’s “Hop on Pop.” While these books are on their reading level, they are misaligned entirely with their interests." Too much focus on physical books and fiction in particular. Older children who still need to improve their foundation skills at the Dr. Seuss level … Read More
“The second problem is a deep lack of age-appropriate “learn-to-read” books for tweens and teens. We cannot support and empower adolescent readers when their only choices for practice are stories like Dr. Seuss’s “Hop on Pop.” While these books are on their reading level, they are misaligned entirely with their interests.”
Too much focus on physical books and fiction in particular. Older children who still need to improve their foundation skills at the Dr. Seuss level can get lots of practice by reading anything and everything in their environment. Parking lot placards, junk mail advertisements, cereal boxes, non-fiction books meant for younger kids, magazines in the waiting room, cook books, restaurant menus, board game instructions, word puzzles, the voter information mailer you get around election time, simple English wikipedia articles, the list goes on. Even playing daily Wordle. These kinds of materials are more aligned to their interests than Hop on Pop and they present more challenge and opportunity for growth than people might realize. Reading does not begin and end with story books.
Carolyn Forte 3 months ago3 months ago
You make some good points and I agree that teachers of upper grades should be equipped to help struggling readers. However, California schools are creating the problem by trying to force pre-schoolers to learn what I used to teach in Kindergarten 50 years ago. In addition, instead of teaching intensive phonics, our schools are creating dyslexics by forcing sight reading on Kindergarteners, creating a sight reading reflex in many children (see http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/1988/BEL%2003-09%20198809.pdf). … Read More
You make some good points and I agree that teachers of upper grades should be equipped to help struggling readers. However, California schools are creating the problem by trying to force pre-schoolers to learn what I used to teach in Kindergarten 50 years ago. In addition, instead of teaching intensive phonics, our schools are creating dyslexics by forcing sight reading on Kindergarteners, creating a sight reading reflex in many children (see http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/1988/BEL%2003-09%20198809.pdf). Dr. Samuel Orton discovered that sight reading was the main cause of dyslexia almost 100 years ago! Our teachers are trained completely wrong and the “reading” curriculum along with the developmentally inappropriate scope and sequence is at fault for the decline in literacy.
meryl 3 months ago3 months ago
The crisis in reading is real. There are a few systematic changes that need to in some cases put back into the curriculum and in some cases added to the curriculum. Firstly, teacher training used to have introduction to linguistics classes as mandatory to fulfill a teaching requirement. Having taught these classes I can attest pre-service teachers get a lot out of a survey course about language, and I know this from the success of … Read More
The crisis in reading is real. There are a few systematic changes that need to in some cases put back into the curriculum and in some cases added to the curriculum. Firstly, teacher training used to have introduction to linguistics classes as mandatory to fulfill a teaching requirement. Having taught these classes I can attest pre-service teachers get a lot out of a survey course about language, and I know this from the success of the teachers who have gone through my classes. Not only does a well-taught introduction to linguistics class assist individuals in a discovery of something that is right in front of us and used without thinking, language, for teachers such a class helps multi-lingual and multi-dialectal students understand heretofore pieces of who they are left out of a main stream curriclum. Secondly, it is time to bring back books. In the California Community Colleges there is a push toward online “free” resources. Unfortunately, these free resources could be resulting in a very big payment for our students, literacy. Reading online is a blessing but for longer pieces of writing, and for those who have particular neurodiverse backgrounds, a paper option should always be available, especially if the reading material is more than a page or two. And think about this, Many of us are aware that we read differently on line than when we read a book or two.
Quicker and cheaper is not the most effective approach when it comes to literacy.