Black teachers: How to recruit them and make them stay
Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
A controversial bill making its way through the California Legislature would make it more difficult for school districts to ban textbooks. The bill would require a two-thirds vote of a school board to remove books or other instructional materials.
Districts could face financial penalties if they don’t provide books and materials that accurately reflect the diversity of the state’s students, according to the bill. School boards could appeal through their county board of education.
A hearing on the bill Wednesday by the Senate Education Committee drew passionate responses in support and opposition.
Assembly Bill 1078, authored by Assemblyman Corey Jackson and supported by State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, was a response to a decision by Temecula Valley Unified board members last month to remove a textbook from the curriculum because it included information about gay rights activist Harvey Milk.
The curriculum was meant to replace outdated textbooks and had already been vetted by 47 Temecula Valley Unified teachers who taught the material in 18 elementary schools as part of a pilot program throughout the year, according to KABC Los Angeles. It was also approved by the California Department of Education.
“Parents in our district have become increasingly worried that school boards will begin to strip away their rights for their children to receive a full and inclusive history education, and teachers are concerned that they will now be tasked with either creating their own aligned materials or using very outdated books,” testified Carolyn Thomas, a Temecula Valley Unified teacher.
“We also find ourselves in the precarious position of determining how to teach the required state standards, while simultaneously complying with our employer’s decision to restrict us from teaching about the historical contributions of diverse individuals,” she said.
The California School Boards Association was among the organizations that agreed with the intent of the bill but said it would create significant complications for school districts. The CSBA is opposed to the financial penalties in the bill; the uniform complaint process, which would duplicate oversight; and the requirement that a public notice that includes the name of the district’s board members be posted on various public websites if a district fails to comply with the bill, said Carlos Machado, legislative advocate for the CSBA.
“We think that this is going in the wrong direction and could eventually hurt the district, its programs, employees and the students that are served by the district by withholding funds from the district,” he said.
The bill was approved by the Senate Education Committee and referred to the Committee on Appropriations with the understanding that its author would meet with representatives of the California School Boards Association and other stakeholders to further amend the bill.
The overreliance on undersupported part-time faculty in the nation’s community colleges dates back to the 1970s during the era of neoliberal reform — the defunding of public education and the beginning of the corporatization of higher education in the United States. Decades of research show that the systemic overreliance on part-time faculty correlates closely with declining rates of student success. Furthermore, when faculty are… read more
Panelists discussed dual admission as a solution for easing the longstanding challenges in California’s transfer system.
A grassroots campaign recalled two members of the Orange Unified School District in an election that cost more than half a million dollars.
Legislation that would remove one of the last tests teachers are required to take to earn a credential in California passed the Senate Education Committee.
Comments (2)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Jen Wiersma 10 months ago10 months ago
An Informed Response to CA Assemblyman Jackson’s Misrepresentations in AB 1078 Standing up for parental rights over our children’s education is more than a campaign slogan; it is essential. As parents are taking action to regain control of their children’s education, we are seeing disinformation campaigns launched to upend their efforts. As a Temecula Unified School District (TVUSD) board member, I’m compelled to address the inaccuracies represented by California Assemblyman Jackson, and co-sponsor Tony Thurmond, … Read More
An Informed Response to CA Assemblyman Jackson’s Misrepresentations in AB 1078
Standing up for parental rights over our children’s education is more than a campaign slogan; it is essential. As parents are taking action to regain control of their children’s education, we are seeing disinformation campaigns launched to upend their efforts. As a Temecula Unified School District (TVUSD) board member, I’m compelled to address the inaccuracies represented by California Assemblyman Jackson, and co-sponsor Tony Thurmond, California Superintendent of Education, regarding AB 1078.
Thurmond recently implied that the TVUSD school board has engaged in:
• Threatening, bullying and mistreating students throughout the district
• Banning books specifically designed to target LGBTQ+ and persons of color
• Wielding local control to avoid inclusive education.
Here are the facts:
Local school boards are uniquely positioned to engage with the local community and obtain important insights about the educational experience of our community. The law requires all students to have equal access to their education free of pervasive vulgarity, obscenity, pornography, and sexual harassment, which are not protected speech under the First Amendment. Recently, the play “Angels in America,” was assigned to a group of students in a TVUSD drama class, included over 100 “F—words”, sexual violence and descriptions of explicit sex and drug use. See highlighted pages 60, 61, and 63 below.
During Superintendent Thurmond’s visit, he met with school activists, but neglected to speak with a family whose daughter was traumatized by this sordid material aimed at sexualizing our students. After alerting her parents, who testified at a TVUSD board meeting, this student suffered mistreatment and subsequent, retaliatory abuse on campus. She SHOULD have been Thurmond’s primary concern. State leaders, schools, teachers, and local board members should be making unbiased, ethical decisions in the classroom and designing policy to support and protect all stakeholders as per CA Educ Code § 233.5.
“Each teacher shall endeavor to impress upon the minds of the pupils the principles of morality, truth, justice, patriotism, and a true comprehension of the rights, duties, and dignity of American citizenship, and the meaning of equality and human dignity, including the promotion of harmonious relations, …to teach them to avoid idleness, profanity, and falsehood… and foster an environment… free from discriminatory attitudes, practices, events, or activities.”
While evaluating our recent K-5 social studies pilot, my colleague and I noted the lack of parental and citizen involvement as per California Ed Code. We initially paused the decision to adopt the curriculum based on the district bypassing the requirement to “promote the involvement of parents and the other members of the community in the selection of instructional materials.” Sec. 60002. The curriculum committee was comprised of 47 teachers and zero parents.
In the process of seeking a robust, collaboratively chosen history curriculum rich in civics and geography, we discovered Harvey Milk’s biography in the proposed supplemental material for 4th grade. We learned this controversial historical figure had an intimate sexual relationship with a minor as reported by Randy Shilts, an award-winning gay reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle, who covered Harvey’s activism and political career. After five months, we just received full access to the teacher’s edition to finish a comprehensive review. The board majority has the right and responsibility to exercise both authority and discretion when adopting materials for 7-10 years. We are NOT banning books as Jackson’s bill asserts. We are working diligently to provide the best educationally suitable materials for our community in our elementary school classrooms while adhering to Fair Act guidelines in the K-12 setting.
This school board was elected to protect and oversee the education of every student regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity. I specifically voted to ban racism and supported a resolution disallowing Critical Race Theory to prevent students from being judged by the color of their skin instead of the content of their character. TVUSD is committed to education which learns from past injustices, racisms, and discrimination and rejects current discrimination threatening to undermine our shared humanity. In a recent Supreme Court decision striking down racial discrimination in college admissions, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote, “The words of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are not like mood rings; they do not change their message from one moment to the next.”
Conclusion
AB 1078 clearly threatens to limit the authority and autonomy of a school board to make the best decisions in educating and protecting kids while upholding parent’s rights. It levies fines against districts, encourages the public to dox school board members, and removes local control in an unconstitutional manner. This is a direct attack on voters. Parents and patriots must call their California state senators and urge them to vote NO on this bill.
Follow @jen4tvusd
Jen4TVUSD.com
Jen Wiersma is a wife, mother and trustee for the Temecula Valley Unified School District, Area 3
Replies
John Fensterwald 10 months ago10 months ago
Thank you for your response, Jen.
Regarding Harvey Milk, the accusations against him have been disputed by LGBTQ advocates who have pointed out that the U.S. government vetted Milk before he was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2009 and in 2021, when the U.S. Navy named a ship the USNS Harvey Milk, according to this report in the Mercury News.