Black teachers: How to recruit them and make them stay
Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
If we could teach American Sign Language to all students, including hearing students, from kindergarten to 12th grade, the benefits would be extraordinary. It would not only eradicate the biggest problems and heartaches for the Deaf community, it would also give a significant, far-reaching gift to hearing people.
Many hearing people seem to crave ASL. I meet people daily who have either a personal connection to sign, or a strong desire to learn it. Ruefully they say, “I know a little ASL; I love it!” or “I’ve always wanted to learn ASL!” while hard-of-hearing and deaf adults lament, “I wish I’d learned it in school.”
There are many realistic ways it could be implemented if only we would change our monolingual, ableist mindset. Some will say things like:
But 48.3 million Americans have significant hearing loss. And our biggest problems are rooted in communication.
Look at the most insidious issues of the Deaf world, not only in the U.S. but worldwide.
Ninety percent of deaf children are born into hearing families. Their parents, well-intentioned, frequently get bad advice from medical and educational specialists. They’re told to repair their child’s hearing by any means possible — especially cochlear implantation — to teach their kid speech, and consider ASL only if the technology “fails.” Parents are uniquely primed to follow that advice because it syncs with their fears, wishful thinking and lack of information.
But this is a dangerous mistake. Language is essential to brain development, and the window for children to learn their first language is both vital and brief (roughly age 0-5.) Focusing on gadgets rather than on deaf children’s natural visual strengths puts them at high risk for language deprivation syndrome. This results in damaged cognitive skills, and it’s an epidemic.
Despite the proven benefits of Deaf schools, 85% of deaf students are mainstreamed into hearing schools. There, they miss out on huge swaths of instruction and often become withdrawn and socially isolated.
Unemployment among members of the Deaf community is high. Friends of mine sometimes apply to 50 or 100 different jobs and are turned down by all when they mention being deaf. Being left out of conversations, which happens in nonsigning families, is one of life’s most painful experiences. Mental health problems and drug abuse are 50% more prevalent among deaf people, and very few therapists sign fluently.
By 2025, half our population is projected to have some kind of hearing loss. Yet many, having not learned ASL, will feel painfully disconnected from the Deaf community. If ASL was taught as part of the U.S. school curriculum from K-12, all these problems would evaporate like ice on a hot sidewalk. The benefits would be profound, with no real downside. School is the ideal time for language acquisition because children absorb language incredibly fast. Integrating it with other academics, as bilingual Spanish/English programs do, would mean nothing was sacrificed. Elementary students could learn ASL via games, ASL-taught art and PE classes, signed poems and stories. Middle schoolers would increase their vocabulary and conversational skills with deaf instructors and Deaf-made videos, study Deaf history and collaborate on projects with students at Deaf schools. In high school, group projects would be done in ASL, and community service could be carried out in collaboration with the Deaf community. At all levels, students would be tested before moving on.
Let’s look at the impact of ASL for all: With a working knowledge of ASL, the fear and grief new parents usually feel on learning their child is deaf would be greatly mitigated, for they’d have seen successful, healthy Deaf adults on videos and in person during their schooling. Once they got over their shock, they would simply code-switch to ASL. And when a deaf child has access to early language via ASL, research shows their brain development, vocabulary and mastery of literacy and speech all increase.
In public schools, interaction between the deaf and hearing students and staff would be intuitive and easy, eliminating the rampant, abysmal educational levels and self-esteem/social problems among our mainstreamed deaf children now.
Deaf people would have a booming industry teaching and developing ASL materials for public schools. And when seeking employment in other fields, they could be interviewed by the employer directly, in ASL. And co-workers could sign, as needed. ASL would eliminate the isolating, traumatizing experience of communication problems within families, as well as with the greater Deaf community, and with therapists, who’d simply sign whenever they had a Deaf client. It empowers hearing babies, too, because they are physically capable of signing far earlier than they can speak.
Hearing people, too, would benefit in many ways. The other day I was in the pool, and instead of shouting to my husband to bring me my book (because I am crazy enough to read in the pool), I just signed to him. How grateful I was to ASL then. Perhaps this situation reflects the yearning I see in hearing people to sign, the desire for a visual language. ASL enables easy communication in noisy places, from a distance, through glass, and without interrupting someone else’s need for silence.
And hearing people could get to know Deaf people, which is a gift that I cannot begin to do justice to in this article.
But there’s a hidden beauty to this plan that goes even deeper — a changed mindset. Having grown up seeing and communicating with thriving Deaf people, students’ views of coping with adversity, and accepting and celebrating physical differences would be altered. Something viewed now as a hardship would instead become recognized as actually having lavish, humorous and cool cultural features.
We’d have done what now often feels impossible; reversed the persistent ableism/audism — so entrenched in society’s thinking — that has given rise to so many serious problems.
What are we waiting for?
•••
Rachel Zemach is a Deaf former San Francisco Bay Area teacher and the author of a new memoir, “The Butterfly Cage,” about her 13-year career as a teacher. She will be reading from her book on Aug. 26 at 11 am at Book Passages, in Corte Madera.
The opinions in this commentary are those of the author. Commentaries published on EdSource represent diverse viewpoints about California’s public education systems. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.
The overreliance on undersupported part-time faculty in the nation’s community colleges dates back to the 1970s during the era of neoliberal reform — the defunding of public education and the beginning of the corporatization of higher education in the United States. Decades of research show that the systemic overreliance on part-time faculty correlates closely with declining rates of student success. Furthermore, when faculty are… read more
Panelists discussed dual admission as a solution for easing the longstanding challenges in California’s transfer system.
A grassroots campaign recalled two members of the Orange Unified School District in an election that cost more than half a million dollars.
Legislation that would remove one of the last tests teachers are required to take to earn a credential in California passed the Senate Education Committee.
Comments (11)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Elizabeth Heck 4 months ago4 months ago
Does anyone know how we can get this implemented?
Kathy Gardner 5 months ago5 months ago
I’ve been saying this for decades! There is absolutely no reason why children in the Deaf community should be left out of anything when there is a very simple solution. Good heavens just teach sign language to all school children – how hard is that?!
Randall Ulrich 8 months ago8 months ago
I am a hearing person who signs. I originally learned ASL for the interest in the language. I then taught my siblings, and we put it to practical use, such as distance, noisy environments, or (in one instance) through windows where one person was outside during winter in a warm car and the other was in a warm house -- neither had to go out into the cold to communicate. Later on, I … Read More
I am a hearing person who signs. I originally learned ASL for the interest in the language. I then taught my siblings, and we put it to practical use, such as distance, noisy environments, or (in one instance) through windows where one person was outside during winter in a warm car and the other was in a warm house — neither had to go out into the cold to communicate.
Later on, I met a group of hearing people in a community theatre, where everyone had learned to sign. I met a woman there, who eventually became my wife (we’ve been together for almost 40 years). She was born hard of hearing (HoH), and she signs. We communicate verbally and via ASL. I am able to accommodate her in noisy environments, over distances, and/or if there are multiple speakers and she loses track during conversations. I also helped her with doctor appointments during COVID, where everyone was wearing masks and she couldn’t lipread, nor could she understand muffled speech because of the masks.
We have also taken ASL classes together in order to enhance our skills; and as a part of the classes, we are required to attend Deaf/Hearing mixers (social events), in order to practice our skills. My wife and I built a lot of great friendships within the Deaf community over the years because of these mixers. And the Deaf people who attended these mixers were genuinely happy to meet and work with ASL students because they were making an effort to learn the language.
One interesting note regarding some of the technology available now: recently, I introduced my wife to a speech-to-text app, Otter.ai. She has it on her phone. She starts the app, and lays the phone on the table. If she ever loses track during conversations with multiple people in a noisy environment, all she has to do is pick up the phone, read the transcript (all speakers are separated out), and she can pick up the thread of the conversation without skipping a beat. Nice use of technology.
I’m all for hearing people learning ASL.
Emily M. 8 months ago8 months ago
Growing up with sisters that were twins (they were 18 months older than me), one with significant hearing loss, I had the opportunity to learn the very basics of ASL. All I remember currently is the alphabet for the most part and I have always yearned to know more. Especially as a child because the twins went to an elementary school that was both hearing and deaf and they learned ASL at a young age … Read More
Growing up with sisters that were twins (they were 18 months older than me), one with significant hearing loss, I had the opportunity to learn the very basics of ASL. All I remember currently is the alphabet for the most part and I have always yearned to know more. Especially as a child because the twins went to an elementary school that was both hearing and deaf and they learned ASL at a young age so that they could communicate with each other, since they were twins and would be around each other for the majority of their years!
I didn’t have the opportunity to go to the same elementary school as they lived with my dad and step-mother in another town and I wished that I could have because I feel that I would have greatly benefited from learning ASL as a child. Not only would I have been able to communicate with them, but it could have (and would have) opened the doors to a whole new world for me and many other opportunities in my life.
I now am wanting to continue with that learning to not only be able to communicate with others, but to also be able to use this skill myself as I get older and my hearing gets a little worse with each year! I totally agree with what the article is saying and it definitely should be a consideration of many schools all over the US and the world!
Mike Hipple 9 months ago9 months ago
I think your idea is interesting. I'm not a person who is deaf, but I use a communication device and I am in the special education community. When I was in high school, they wanted me to take a second language because in Wisconsin you need to take this to go to college. I asked my teacher would my communication device count and she said I will check with the state. When she asked the … Read More
I think your idea is interesting. I’m not a person who is deaf, but I use a communication device and I am in the special education community. When I was in high school, they wanted me to take a second language because in Wisconsin you need to take this to go to college. I asked my teacher would my communication device count and she said I will check with the state. When she asked the answer was no. She said but he is still learning a second language and I can’t put him in a Spanish or a German class because it’s more than likely that his aide, his parents, or I needed to adjust the class work.
So this discussion has been going on for years. I wish you good luck and please remember about all students who can’t use their mouth to speak.
PATRICIA PLATZEK 9 months ago9 months ago
Excellent idea! Recently, I was wondering if older hearing folks (who knew ASL) with cognitive decline, would retain “words/ideas’, and be able to express them more easily than the spoken word.
I would love to hear if any research or antidotal evidence of this was available?
el 9 months ago9 months ago
One of the reasons we teach language is to learn more about different people and different cultures and to understand how language reflects different experience. Seeing how grammar can structure differently, understanding what concepts are worthy of words, that there isn't a universal one-to-one relationship of even words for snow or colors or other elements that we take for granted, this is really interesting for learning more about people. Hearing loss is something that happens to … Read More
One of the reasons we teach language is to learn more about different people and different cultures and to understand how language reflects different experience. Seeing how grammar can structure differently, understanding what concepts are worthy of words, that there isn’t a universal one-to-one relationship of even words for snow or colors or other elements that we take for granted, this is really interesting for learning more about people.
Hearing loss is something that happens to a large percentage of people eventually. It can also be situational.
I would love to see more opportunities to learn signing.
Nunya 9 months ago9 months ago
You have an entitled worldview and a clear bias in your presentation. It is stunning how you could possibly demand so much and downplay the technological advancements in hearing aides and auditory rejuvenation.
Replies
WF 9 months ago9 months ago
As the father of a child with cochlear implants, I have to push back against this perspective. Even if they worked perfectly for all kids (and they don't--CI outcomes are hugely variable, and about half of all children stop using CIs after their 18th birthday) the quality of sound and the effort that decoding that sound can take is enormous. My child is a "CI success," and is bilingual in spoken English and ASL, but … Read More
As the father of a child with cochlear implants, I have to push back against this perspective. Even if they worked perfectly for all kids (and they don’t–CI outcomes are hugely variable, and about half of all children stop using CIs after their 18th birthday) the quality of sound and the effort that decoding that sound can take is enormous. My child is a “CI success,” and is bilingual in spoken English and ASL, but still has trouble hearing in noisy environments like classrooms and is clearly exhausted with the strain that listening through his CIs takes, especially in places like schools where he’s got to continually pay attention.
Cochlear implants and hearing aids will never not be prosthetics. People can do amazing things with with them, but not everyone with a prosthetic leg wants to run a marathon on it. It’s inappropriate to expect deaf children to put in heroic–and often unsuccessful–efforts with their hearing technology just to receive the education that hearing children take for granted. For a child with typical vision and motor skills—deaf or hearing—ASL is a fully accessible language. When my child is in a signing environment, communication is effortless and transparent in a way it will never be in the hearing world. If that’s an entitled perspective, it’s one where every child is entitled to learn and socialize without barriers, where the most basic tools of society, culture and intellect–language–are available to my son just as they are to any hearing child.
Jennifer Thompson 9 months ago9 months ago
Your perspective on this is unique and refreshing. Thanks for adding something new to the conversation!
Barbara Raimondo 9 months ago9 months ago
Excellent article! There has been a lot more acceptance of ASL over recent years, but still not enough people know it. What a benefit it would be for everyone to have greater fluency. Thanks for spreading the word.