Credit: Al Seib / Los Angeles Times / Polaris
This article was updated with more data and analysis at 5:41 pm Jan. 7.

After five straight years of gradual improvement, standardized test scores declined significantly last year for many California students, most of whom spent 2020-21 in distance learning. Gaps in achievement between Black and Hispanic students and their white and Asian peers, already wide before the pandemic, expanded in math and English language arts.

State education officials, however, cautioned that the number of students who took the tests last year was much smaller than in earlier years. Before the pandemic, districts were required to administer Smarter Balanced tests each spring. The tests were suspended in the spring of 2020 and last year the tests were optional. Only 744,000 of 3.1 million students in grades three to eight and 11 took the Smarter Balanced tests last spring. While less than a quarter of the total, the scores are a strong indication of how much students have fallen behind in learning during the pandemic.

Also reversing a decade-long trend, 4-year graduation rates fell by less than 1 percentage point, to 83.6%, although they fell sharply among Black students, by 4.3 percentage points, and Latino students by 1.6 percentage points, reflecting the disruption and havoc caused by Covid in communities of color. Graduation rates, however, increased among whites and Asians, rising to 94.1%.

The release Friday of Smarter Balanced assessment scores and other school data provides strong evidence that the pandemic has set back learning in core academic subjects, particularly among early elementary students, whom teachers said had the most difficulty adjusting to classes on Zoom. The tests were administered throughout spring 2021 on computers to students who had spent most of the year learning remotely.

The scores are “depressing but also inevitable since California was among states that kept students in distance learning the longest,” said Arun Ramanathan, CEO of Pivot Learning, a nonprofit consulting organization that works with schools in California and other states on improving achievement. “Schools did not do a good job serving kids virtually and many kids stopped coming to school, especially in early grades” among low-income families without the resources to help their children.

“I could see this in my basement with my wife trying to teach kindergartners over Zoom to read,” said Ramanathan, who is married to a teacher.

Last year, districts had the option of taking Smarter Balanced or another local assessment aligned to the Common Core standards, and most chose the latter, including 16 of the 20 largest districts. This spring, students in all districts will resume taking Smarter Balanced tests, including a science assessment. The Smarter Balanced tests given in 2021 and the ones this spring will be shorter, cutting the assessment time by as much as half. However, a study for the California State Board of Education found that the results of the short and long versions could be reliably compared.

EdSource compared the test scores of the 3,063 district and charter schools that gave Smarter Balanced assessments last year and two years earlier, in pre-pandemic 2018-19. The state suspended testing in 2019-20 because schools closed in response to the pandemic in March 2020, when testing was scheduled to begin.

In those schools that administered the tests last year, 48.9% of students met or exceeded standards in English language arts in 2021 — the equivalent of passing the test — down from 52.2% in 2019. In math, 33.6% met or exceeded standards, down from 38.2% in 2019.

The overall decline in pass rates from 2019 was 12% in math and 6% in English language arts.

But for Latino students the drop was much sharper, 22% in math and 10% in English.

Black students’ scores fell 9% in math, 7% in English.

White students’ scores declined 10% in math and 5% in English. Comparing scores for Asian students was not reliable because of the small numbers of test takers.

Scores for low-income students fell 21% in math and 10% in English.

Reflecting difficulties in adjusting to remote learning, younger students did profoundly worse than older students. Math scores dropped 20.1% for third-graders, 21.5% for fourth-graders and 22.1% for fifth-graders but only 10.1% for seventh-graders. Scores for 11th-graders, the only high school students to take the tests, actually rose: 5.3% in math and 2.5% in English. This could reflect the participation rate, however.

“The data is sobering. What we are seeing has the potential to have life-altering impacts, especially for our youngest learners, if we don’t collectively work to provide kids every opportunity and support in the months and years ahead,” said Samantha Tran, senior managing director, education policy, for the nonprofit advocacy organization Children Now.

The pandemic and distance learning appear to have affected English learners’ progress in learning English as well. Close to 1 in 5 students in California public schools — about 1.1 million— are considered English learners. Schools are required by state and federal law to test students on their level of English proficiency, if they speak a language other than English at home. The test is given to English learners every year, until they achieve a high enough score to be considered fluent in English.

More English learners scored at lower levels of English proficiency last school year than they did two years earlier, and fewer tested at the higher levels. Schools faced many difficulties in testing students for English proficiency during distance learning. In 2018-19, 96% of enrolled English learners were tested, while in 2020-21, only 89% were tested.

The lower scores may be a result of both the conditions of testing and the quality of English language instruction during distance learning, said Magaly Lavadenz, a professor of English Learner research, and executive director of the Center for Equity for English Learners at Loyola Marymount University. Lavadenz said English language development instruction varied widely from district to district. “It suffered in many places,” Lavadenz said.

Also, she said, testing remotely at home in many instances may have affected results. “It was very confusing for families, especially for young children. We know that the conditions for testing were not optimal, by any means,” Lavadenz said.

Smarter Balanced scores for English learners plummeted 30.3% in math; only 1 in 12 English learners met or exceeded standards on the test. Only 11.3% met or exceeded standards in English language arts.

The California Department of Education cautioned against reading too much into the two-year comparison. Districts in a normal year are required to have a 95% participation rate, but that was suspended for last year’s test. Absences may have been significant in some schools, and the 24% of California students who took the test may not fully correspond to the state’s demographics. At the same time, the data may understate the decline in scores, because students who had poor internet connections and who were chronically absent last year may not have taken the test.

“The lower and uneven participation rates require that data interpretations regarding the 2020–21 assessment results be made with explicit caution, keeping in mind the specific context and conditions of the learning experience at that school and district,” the department warned in an interpretation guide to the results.

Along with graduation rates, the state released suspension and chronic absenteeism rates. Suspension rates plummeted to under 1% or less for all student groups, which is not surprising since students weren’t physically in school. Chronic absenteeism rates were problematic, too, increasing from 12.1% to 14.3% in 2021, with bigger jumps among Black and Hispanic students, foster youths and English learners.

But the increases may be understated, said Hedy Chang, executive director of the nonprofit Attendance Works. “California chose to make it easy to be counted as present during distance learning,” such as texting or simply signing in to class. “Therefore, with a lower bar for showing up, we likely have an undercount.”

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond said the statewide data are instructional.

“The statewide performance data from last year confirm what we heard from school districts and county offices throughout the year. Namely, the challenges that students and educators faced during the pandemic were multi-dimensional and disruptive to learning and mental health,” he said in a press release. “Our goal now is to move all students forward. We are thankful for the historic investments in education, and I am putting forward a bold agenda to address long-standing inequities.”

Ramanathan, however, criticized the state’s lack of focus on student achievement. “The state is flooding the system with money but is it directed to teach kids math and to read in the early grades? My worry is that state leaders will frame the scores as a pandemic result. The lack of an early literacy and math instruction strategy is a multi-year failure of our state.”

EdSource reporter Zaidee Stavely contributed to this article. 

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (5)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Brian Guerrero 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

    Why is it that when you describe growth - "Slow growth, big disparities after 5 years of Smarter Balanced tests" (2019) - you describe ABSOLUTE growth: "Overall proficiency rose only about 1 percentage point for English language arts and math, compared with 2 points in 2017-18. After five years of Smarter Balanced, students who met or exceeded standards had increased 7 percentage points in both tests." Yet when you describe declines - "Standardized test scores in California … Read More

    Why is it that when you describe growth – “Slow growth, big disparities after 5 years of Smarter Balanced tests” (2019) – you describe ABSOLUTE growth:
    “Overall proficiency rose only about 1 percentage point for English language arts and math, compared with 2 points in 2017-18. After five years of Smarter Balanced, students who met or exceeded standards had increased 7 percentage points in both tests.”
    Yet when you describe declines – “Standardized test scores in California fell during year in distance learning” (2022) – you use RELATIVE declines:
    “The overall decline in pass rates from 2019 was 12% in math and 6% in English language arts.”
    Could it be that you intentionally downplay positive news and sensationalize negative news?
    If you reported the 2021 test results the same way you reported the 2018 growth, you would have said, ‘The overall decline in pass rates from 2019 was 4.6 percentage points in math and 3.3 percentage points in English language arts’ … not 12% and 6% … but of course 12% and 6% sound much more dire and dramatic.
    I am in no way saying that declines of 3 and 4 percentage points are something to celebrate, but I do believe that a bit of perspective is in order here. From spring 2020 to spring 2021, the American education system had to reinvent itself from the bottom up over night. Teachers, with minimal support from school administrators or education “experts,” had to figure out how to reach students and engage them in distance learning. Students were experiencing sickness in their families, job loss, food and housing insecurity, and racial and ethnic strife. So were many teachers. No one is saying, “Yay! Distance learning, let’s keep doing that!” But there was a pandemic going on and people were (and still are) dying. We have a lot of work to do to make up for lost ground and inequities that existed long before anyone had ever heard of COVID-19, but if after a year and a half of pandemic and economic upheaval, we ONLY lost 3 and 4 percentage points on an unevenly administered standardized test… I think we did okay.

  2. Frances O'Neill Zimmerman 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    No surprises here. Though State Superintendent Tony Thurmond and his pals in the California Teachers Association try at every opportunity to delegitimize the truth-telling value of Smarter Balanced or Common Core tests for student achievement, the pandemic year of distance-learning has only widened the chasm of underperforming public school students in English language arts (reading) and mathematics. These kids may never make up their learning deficits, while billions of extra federal and state dollars are … Read More

    No surprises here. Though State Superintendent Tony Thurmond and his pals in the California Teachers Association try at every opportunity to delegitimize the truth-telling value of Smarter Balanced or Common Core tests for student achievement, the pandemic year of distance-learning has only widened the chasm of underperforming public school students in English language arts (reading) and mathematics. These kids may never make up their learning deficits, while billions of extra federal and state dollars are flowing into “social/emotional” spending categories – whatever those are – rather than into desperately needed remedial academic programs for our burgeoning population of truly underserved schoolchildren.

  3. Donald M. scott 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    Your homework: Watch Harry Potter - the Order of the Phoenix - a brilliant satire on tests - and note the character Dolores Umbrage. Then work hard to get rid of those tools of the corporate state, the standardized tests. Teaching to the test is better known as "no child allowed to go ahead." Donald M. Scott, as listed in Who's Who in American Education and Who's Who in Americ. Read More

    Your homework: Watch Harry Potter – the Order of the Phoenix – a brilliant satire on tests – and note the character Dolores Umbrage. Then work hard to get rid of those tools of the corporate state, the standardized tests. Teaching to the test is better known as “no child allowed to go ahead.”

    Donald M. Scott, as listed in Who’s Who in American Education and Who’s Who in Americ.

  4. Deborah Meyer-Morris 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    What is the data on students with disabilities from these Smarter Balance tests? How much larger is their achievement gap? What was participation rate of SWD who took the test last year compared to 2019?

  5. Faye Johnson 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    I can understand you felt you needed to publish such an article with the test score release. I’d like to be able to say you made an honest attempt to be objective in your coverage,but I can’t. There are just too many unknowns about who took the test and under what conditions. If we’re going to compare, then let’s also consider all of the conditions of testing, not just one (distance learning).