Credit: Andrew Reed/EdSource
Students learn during a Spanish class at Yerba Buena High School in the East Side Union High School District before the pandemic in 2019.

As I reflect on the past 10 months of leading a school district during this pandemic, I recall Rahm Emanuel famously quipping when he was chief of staff for President Obama: “You never want to let a serious crisis go to waste. . . . It’s an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.”

We can’t allow the crisis of the pandemic to go to waste.

If Gov. Newsom and the Legislature were willing to suspend certain parts of the state education code and provide the extra resources to meet the challenges of distance learning during the pandemic, then why not take the same approach to incorporate a much-needed new paradigm of teaching and learning after the pandemic?

California’s public education system is failing too many of our young people. To change what the system produces, we must change the system. We must call on our legislators to make key changes to the state education code in the areas of finance, instructional minutes and teacher credentialing.

We need changes in how public schools are funded and how we prepare candidates to become teachers. School districts should have more flexibility so that the lessons learned and the best practices developed during the pandemic can be incorporated to better serve our students.

State funding of public schools is tied to how the school day is scheduled. Restructuring the school day, week and year to allow a schedule for relationships between adults and students to take place will better serve the community.

Changing state law to allow for scheduling flexibility each school day and a longer school year would address funding and learning concerns. Under current state law, the required 64,800 annual high school instructional minutes are organized in 55-minute class periods, a six-period day and 180 instructional days. To be creative, each of the nearly 1,000 school districts in the state would have to negotiate schedule changes locally.

But in response to the pandemic, in our San Jose high school district, our schedule during distance learning provides opportunities for teachers to go deeper into their lessons and allows students to demonstrate their learning in nontraditional ways.

Our schedule also provides built-in tutorial and advisory periods and allows for ongoing professional development. It includes synchronous (live class lessons) and asynchronous (students learn at their own pace) time for teaching and learning.

This schedule would not have been allowed pre-pandemic.

That’s because state law requires a specific amount of daily, synchronous instruction and 180 instructional days. We must change the law so asynchronous instruction counts toward a district’s overall instructional minutes and therefore how much state funding they receive. Saturday and evening instruction should count toward meeting the requirements.

The Legislature should also revamp how school districts are funded. California uses a two-tiered funding model for K-12 schools. Of California’s 942 school districts, between 125 and 150 a year are funded through local property taxes rather than by the state. As a result of formulas established decades ago, these districts are allowed to keep their property taxes because the amount is larger than what they would get from the state. They tend to be affluent districts, but not all are. These districts can receive as much as $10,000 per pupil a year more.

I don’t advocate taking resources from these districts. Rather, all districts should be funded at this higher level, which means the state must provide far more funding for all districts.

We must also change how we prepare candidates to be teachers. Today, elementary school teachers must be “Jacks of all trades,” that is, they must teach all subjects. We have decades of data to show that students begin to fall behind in math in grades 4 and 5. We need teachers who specialize in teaching math and science in those critical grades. That would require the Legislature to change the education code to require single-subject credentials to teach math and science in those grades and to authorize funding to cover the additional cost. This will provide students the proper foundation for success.

These are just some examples to how changes to the Education Code would empower California schools to better serve their students.

Our students should have time to explore areas that interest them and to double down in areas where they thrive. It is important they have time and space to build community, address social and racial injustice issues, support their mental health needs and truly develop strategic thinking skills for full participation in their local communities and the global society.

Let’s not waste this crisis.

•••

Chris D. Funk is superintendent of East Side Union High School District in San Jose.

Commentaries published on EdSource represent viewpoints from EdSource’s broad audience. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (4)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Michael Matsuda 2 months ago2 months ago

    Well done Chris. As a fellow superintendent, I especially appreciate your comments on the required instructional minutes and changing the ed code to allow for asychronous instructional time. Asychronous and hybrid instruction is not going to disappear after the pandemic. Also, regarding teaching credentials, with respect to secondary, CTC, needs to update credentialing to meet needs of emerging fields such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, biotech. There are no credentials in these areas … Read More

    Well done Chris. As a fellow superintendent, I especially appreciate your comments on the required instructional minutes and changing the ed code to allow for asychronous instructional time. Asychronous and hybrid instruction is not going to disappear after the pandemic.

    Also, regarding teaching credentials, with respect to secondary, CTC, needs to update credentialing to meet needs of emerging fields such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, biotech. There are no credentials in these areas yet are in high demand for jobs and careers. We have become too siloed in content expertise. Global warming will never be solved with kids stuck in curricular boxes.

  2. Milton 2 months ago2 months ago

    Funny how these ‘reforms’ would lead to less face to face instructional minutes for students, and yet more money for educators, without tying any accountability to student academic performance! CA public schools are not producing proficient students, yet the solution proposed is to reduce instruction and pay teachers more.

  3. Susan Dihle 2 months ago2 months ago

    Let's also leverage the things that this pandemic has highlighted. Along with the ridiculously short school year with the very long summer break, let's finally do something about the digital divide. That has long been an issue in the US as in other nations. At last, though, this pandemic has shown us the serious problems that students without reliable internet access face compared to those with reliable access and sufficient bandwidth. In short, this is … Read More

    Let’s also leverage the things that this pandemic has highlighted. Along with the ridiculously short school year with the very long summer break, let’s finally do something about the digital divide.

    That has long been an issue in the US as in other nations. At last, though, this pandemic has shown us the serious problems that students without reliable internet access face compared to those with reliable access and sufficient bandwidth. In short, this is yet another instance of the haves being unfairly privileged vs the have-nots. Below a certain annual income, all families with school-age children should have free internet access at a basic level. They would not need cable TV, HBO, or other luxuries. But very obviously, they do need the capability to reach school personnel as well as research facilities (including even YouTube).

  4. Jennifer Nelson 2 months ago2 months ago

    This is right on. An outside the box way of thinking spurred on by a crisis, exactly the kick education needed to get into the 21st century of learning.