As more California school districts reopen campuses, many are finding themselves in the middle of a contentious debate among parents over safety and other priorities.
Part of nearly every school district’s reopening plan has involved asking families directly when they would like to return to campus and under what circumstances. Now, school districts are facing the difficult realities of weighing a wide range of concerns while building trust among Black, Latino, special education and other parent groups who say their voices have been stifled.
Across the country, about 41% of parents said they want their child to participate only in distance learning under the current Covid-19 conditions, while 35% prefer fully in-person instruction and 21% would like a hybrid model that combines both in-person school with online classes, according to a nationally representative survey of parents by the USC Center for Economic and Social Research conducted from Jan. 20-Feb. 17.
What’s more, there’s a wide difference of opinion among parents of different racial, ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. About 46% of white parents nationwide said they wanted in-person school, compared with 14% of Black and 29% of Latino parents. Higher-income parents were also more likely to say they wanted their kids to be back on campus compared with those earning less.
In California, recently ground zero for the pandemic in the U.S., parents are more reluctant to have their children return to the classroom. Only 14% of parents wanted in-person classes compared to 65% of parents who prefer remote-only instruction under current conditions, according to the same USC survey. Out of 1,330 adults who responded to the question, 455 were from California and demographics reflected the state’s overall population.
In West Contra Costa Unified, a large urban district that encompasses Richmond and surrounding communities, a recent district-wide survey conducted from Dec. 16 to Jan. 15 found that more than a third of parents prefer distance learning for the remainder of the school year, compared with only 15% who would send their children back to school under the current conditions.
Other parents said they only feel comfortable sending their kids back under certain safety criteria, such as if a vaccine for teachers was readily available (10%) or if a majority of the county had been vaccinated (14%). Another 14% were undecided.
But at a school board meeting in early February, district leaders pointed out a major caveat regarding the survey: Only a fifth of the district’s families participated, and white and wealthier families, such as those in El Cerrito, were overrepresented compared with the district’s overall enrollment.
“We obviously did see the EL Cerrito community show up the largest in this survey,” superintendent Matthew Duffy said in the board meeting. District officials said there is not yet a plan to re-issue a reopening poll this spring.
Zip codes located in El Cerrito also have far fewer cases of Covid-19 than cities with more low-income families that West Contra Costa Unified serves, such as Richmond and San Pablo, according to recent data from the Contra Costa County health department. That is consistent with Covid-19 trends across the state, where Black, Latino and low-income families, as well as people experiencing homelessness, are often more at risk of Covid-19, partly because these groups are more likely to have dense living situations or are unable to work from home.
One major challenge with surveying parents is how quickly research and opinions around Covid-19 can change, said Bobby Jordan, public information officer for West Contra Costa Unified. In the weeks since the district released its reopening survey, California has opened mass vaccination sites, announced a $6.5 billion school reopening deal, and Covid-19 cases have dipped significantly. As conditions change, parent responses may also shift.
Jennifer Peck, a mother of a junior at El Cerrito High School, has become a vocal supporter of moving more quickly to safely reopening schools in West Contra Costa Unified. But like many, her stance on reopening has evolved as more information about virus transmission and vaccines have become available and seeing her daughter struggle with isolation from distance learning over a prolonged period of time.
“Evidence was coming out about infection rates in schools, and I was hearing more about districts that have been opened,” said Peck, who has been supportive of school closures while infection rates were high but said she’s been disappointed by the lack of transparent planning to bring students back. “It all culminated and by the end of last calendar year, we basically said we have to do something or there’s no chance our kids will be back in school this year.”
As Covid-19 cases have been on the decline across much of California, school districts in the Bay Area and beyond are taking temperature checks on reopening and finding issues similar to those in West Contra Costa.
Oakland Unified published the results of its parent survey in early January, showing that 41% of parents support bringing their child to school for some form of in-person instruction this year, while the vast majority of respondents said they were unsure or preferred their children to remain in distance learning.
White parents, who were overrepresented in the Oakland Unified poll compared with the district’s enrollment, like in other surveys were far more likely to respond “Yes” to bringing their kids back to campus.
“The overall results of the survey do not give a clear picture of our district as a whole because the survey sample is not representative of OUSD’s diversity,” the district website reads.
In Los Angeles Unified, a survey conducted in early December found just a third of parents said they wanted to send their kids back to school for a hybrid model that combines in-person instruction with online classes, while two-thirds they would like to remain fully online. A little more than a third of parents in the district responded; however, there was parity among the racial make-up of those who responded and overall student enrollment.
In Oakland, district leaders launched a new preference form in mid-February asking whether parents with children in grades TK-5 would send their kids back to their physical schools once the option becomes available.
Applying parent input
While imperfect, the data from these surveys are an important tool for school districts and teachers’ unions to get a pulse on how families feel as they discuss plans to reopen campuses.
“I desperately wish I could provide the certainty that we all crave. In the meantime, we must keep engaging with this uncertainty while acknowledging the difficulty and stress that it brings us all,” said Oakland Unified Superintendent Kyla Johnson-Trammell in a letter to families on Feb. 18.
But even parents who are eager for in-person school to resume and have responded to calls for input lack confidence in the reopening process and their district’s communication with parents.
“The survey was so long and confusing, it didn’t really give me the option of saying the thing I wanted to say,” said Peck, the El Cerrito High School parent. “I desperately want my kid back in school, but we aren’t ready. I wasn’t going to say yes to that.”
Among the challenges that districts face in reopening campuses is a lack of proper ventilation in school buildings. At Richmond High School, for example, most classrooms do not have windows that open to allow for air circulation, which is recommended by health professionals.
“The reason why a lot of parents of color are concerned about reopening is that we already knew the state our schools were in before Covid. We didn’t have soap, schools weren’t clean and class sizes were too big,” said Shakira Reynolds, co-founder of the Parent Leadership Council in West Contra Costa Unified. “Now you want to couple that with Covid and without knowing what the plan is; it doesn’t make sense for a lot of folks how that would be OK.”
Across California, how and when to bring students back to their physical campuses has become a polarizing debate.
In January, a group called Open Schools California formed with the goal of encouraging schools to reopen as soon and as safely as possible. The group includes parents from Richmond, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and other cities.
“Locking older children out of the classroom ignores the science and data that shows school closures are impacting kids of every age. Schools are an essential public service and should be treated as such — the last institutions to close when cases spike and the first to reopen,” said Ross Novie, a parent and member of Open Schools California based in Los Angeles.
Supporters of the group point to growing evidence that supports strategies to reopen safely and that student mental health has deteriorated greatly since schools shut down last spring.
In West Contra Costa, a group called Safe Open Schools formed in December in support of reopening schools as quickly and as safely as possible. Recently, the group sent a letter to the school board and district leadership with about 450 parent and teacher signatures “urging implementation of a comprehensive plan for reopening as soon as possible,” said Kelly Hardy, a parent of a 3rd-grade student in the district.
To solicit parent input for its survey, West Contra Costa Unified District officials turned to their go-to communication channels: social media, automated calls home, text messages to parents, and through community partners such as churches and local media. When it became clear that the incoming responses were skewing towards wealthier schools in the district, they targeted outreach to schools that were less represented. Even then, only a fifth of parents responded.
“Parent outreach is critical. We always have to keep striving to get better to reach families and make sure we are doing everything we can to get information out to them,” said Jordan, the spokesman for West Contra Costa Unified.
Trust is proving to be one of the most challenging ingredients to bringing students back.
Some researchers have suggested creating an “infection control” or “healthy schools” team that community members can look to for updates and information on Covid-19 in schools.
Elena Silva, director of PreK–12 for the Education Policy program at New America, a nonpartisan think tank, advised district officials in West Contra Costa Unified to acknowledge and work to remove preexisting inequalities in schools, while being transparent and specific about steps taken to bring students back to a safe physical learning environment.
“Being honest is really important. Communicate about how hard it is but also stay as positive as possible,” Silva said. “Folks have been hearing for a long time that we don’t know how to handle it, and they need to know there are plans and that we can do it.”
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Leah Naomi Gonzales 2 years ago2 years ago
This is my second round of comment here. First off I want to share with all of you, what I have learned in the past couple of months. It is harsh and not what many people want to hear. That is a reference to the don't return to school advocates as well as the districts and unions. What I've learned is in regards to several aspects. First one is this. I chose to look at this from … Read More
This is my second round of comment here. First off I want to share with all of you, what I have learned in the past couple of months. It is harsh and not what many people want to hear. That is a reference to the don’t return to school advocates as well as the districts and unions.
What I’ve learned is in regards to several aspects. First one is this.
I chose to look at this from a follow the funding aspect. Meaning, don’t think of it in a health aspect or and education aspect. Look at it from a business perspective.
What made me do this? Our school districts website has different links to itself online.
One is https://www.berkeleyschools.net/departments/business-services-division/.
First time I decided to look at school as a business. Why not. The three largest forms of government undertakings in the United States are Education, Military, and Police
That last one includes actual police, courts, jails and by proxy any outliers such as community services related to crime, criminals and reparations for crimes.
These three categories are without question the biggest moneymaker and money takers our country has, governmentally.
That being said, I thought, Usually when something happens in one of these categories it ends up being all about the money. So I looked at the money.
First place I looked was at the obvious one. The CARES ACT.
I found finding under many different titles.
A whole first page description withe different titles and even a timeline of when money needed to be applied for, reapplied for, spent, reported on, etc…
For a first glance it opened up my eyes completely.
What I found was a timeline that equaled the same one our school district had gone along for the last year.
For every time we were told school would close reopen not reopen, falsely reopen, begin remote learning, fully implement DL plan for learning loss, upgrade schoolmates for safety and health, begin smaller cohort return to in person, phase in this phase in that… there was an equal date on that Cares Act funding timeline.
So as the money flowed so did the decisions for our children’s lives and our lives and teachers lives?
Wait a minute. I thought this was about an illness that was so rampant and dangerous and uncontrollable, that all of our lives had to upended and with no insight as to how that might go on a day to day basis or with case surges… how the heck did the cares act have a timeline that funded schools and matched, AHEAD OF TIME, for all these covid cases related decisions?
Like when school districts around the country all decided July 15th 2020 that inperson school couldn’t happen due to covid and DL would be fully implemented for the school year?
How did that have a lime connecting it to case surges AND CARES FUNDS?
When our state changed its Covid-19 cases reporting and reopening criteria, which then led to our schools not reopening according to the schedule initially provided; how come the cares act funding fit that timeline?
For every instance in which I found cares funding capable of being gained with certain requirements having to be fit, by certain dates, our worlds somehow aligned to those dates.
Kismet wasn’t happening here.
Lots of prior planning was happening here.
You know these god awful surveys we’ve been given for the last year? The ones that said screwy things like if you were to choose to let your child return to school on a hybrid model which would you prefer mornings from 10 to 12 pm twice a week with afternoons DL from 12:15 to 3:30 pm? Or morning DL 5 days a week from 8 am to 12:45 pm with three 45 minute asynchronous learning periods and in-person instruction 2 days a week from 1:15 pm to 2:45 m and have your child bring their laptop and be prepared to sit quietly for that length of time.
Where did they get these ideas?
Well they created them based on needing those surveys to finalize with certain results.
In order to be eligible to get CARES FUNDS.
There’s so many different ways the dots all fit.
Take a look for yourself. Follow the money.
This has never been about COVID-19. That was a great tool they had in their toolbox.
Scary one too and efficient as all get out
Brian 2 years ago2 years ago
It is not safe for students to return to in person learning, unless the school in question only has upwards of 5-10 students in a classroom, socially distanced, with proper mandates still being enforced, which obviously in poorly regulated, rightist states like Texas, isn't how it is. Most of the rallies I see all over the U.S. are being held by parents of non-colored backgrounds, like do you people have nothing else to do, besides … Read More
It is not safe for students to return to in person learning, unless the school in question only has upwards of 5-10 students in a classroom, socially distanced, with proper mandates still being enforced, which obviously in poorly regulated, rightist states like Texas, isn’t how it is.
Most of the rallies I see all over the U.S. are being held by parents of non-colored backgrounds, like do you people have nothing else to do, besides pretending to be “oppressed” from Monday-Friday? Like, “Kim, there’s people that are dying” and this is what you all are doing? It really makes me mad that they are ok with putting their kids at risk, just so that they could go to class in person.
It shouldn’t matter whether Covid will have a negative long lasting effect or not, it’s better not to get it and be safe from it, end of story. It’s also worth noting that parents think their children will benefit more from in person learning, which in some cases that may be true, but for most students, it really doesn’t make a difference whether it’s in person learning or not. Personally, I’d rather have students be safe from getting Covid, then even risking the chance of exposure.
Guillermina Navarro 2 years ago2 years ago
I don’t think it is safe to send kids to school fully and not following the 6 feet distancing. In Chino, the Newman School have the all classes with 27 kids and only 3 feet apart. That’s not safe for our kids.
Sean 2 years ago2 years ago
Our school in WCCUSD ran out of soap last year (pre-covid) so I share people's hesitation about how well we could pull this off. But, as others have said, the survey was sent during a particularly dire time and was worded to basically lead you to prefer distance learning. Other schools, nearby, are open. It can be done safely. I don't want anyone getting sick. I don't want to spread COVID. But we cannot do … Read More
Our school in WCCUSD ran out of soap last year (pre-covid) so I share people’s hesitation about how well we could pull this off. But, as others have said, the survey was sent during a particularly dire time and was worded to basically lead you to prefer distance learning. Other schools, nearby, are open. It can be done safely. I don’t want anyone getting sick. I don’t want to spread COVID. But we cannot do another year of remote learning. The district has externalized all of the pain and effort onto families and then declared that it is working fine. It is not working. Distance learning, at least for my family, is a pale, pale imitation of in-person learning.
Marion 2 years ago2 years ago
Marco is right. At a meeting over a month ago, representatives from the County Health Dept. pointed out at a WCCUSD School Board meeting that the county doesn't even collect the data (Covid rates by zip code) that the MOU requires for reopening – and even so, the MOU has not been revised. And other commentators here are right to note that these reopening surveys are poorly designed; with the WCCUSD survey sent in December … Read More
Marco is right. At a meeting over a month ago, representatives from the County Health Dept. pointed out at a WCCUSD School Board meeting that the county doesn’t even collect the data (Covid rates by zip code) that the MOU requires for reopening – and even so, the MOU has not been revised. And other commentators here are right to note that these reopening surveys are poorly designed; with the WCCUSD survey sent in December – when we all knew a surge was coming – the survey only asked: “Do you want to send your child back?,” and not anything more nuanced, such as: “Do you want to send your child back to school once transmission rates have fallen to X and the schools meet state reopening guidelines etc.?” And then this faulty “data” they collect is used to justify the WCCUSD Board’s continued inaction.
This is a terrible moment for CA public schools; my fear is that, by digging in, United Teachers of Richmond and other unions will really destroy taxpayers’ confidence in public schools, cause greater enrollment and financial losses while more families change districts or shift to privates, and really harm public ed in lower-income districts for a generation. It seems such a shortsighted strategy.
Jerry 2 years ago2 years ago
I have a student who has Multiple Disabilities/Orthopedic, and I’m very happy with the distance learning program we’re doing together!
We need to rethink our approaches to socializing children. We don’t need to move millions of children and teachers around town five days a week. As a benefit we can also save money, time, resources and lower air pollution to meet our targets asap.
SD Parent 2 years ago2 years ago
If the survey doesn't ask parents "why," districts can't just assume they know. The survey results may not be as simple as parents' concerns over safety. In some cases, what is being offered as "hybrid learning" is actually even fewer synchronous instructional minutes than the limited amount students are receiving during online learning because of dividing students into smaller cohorts. If a student is being offered just two mornings per week of synchronous instruction … Read More
If the survey doesn’t ask parents “why,” districts can’t just assume they know. The survey results may not be as simple as parents’ concerns over safety. In some cases, what is being offered as “hybrid learning” is actually even fewer synchronous instructional minutes than the limited amount students are receiving during online learning because of dividing students into smaller cohorts. If a student is being offered just two mornings per week of synchronous instruction in person (with the remaining days asynchronous) in “hybrid learning” versus five mornings per week for online instruction, it could be a question of how is it going to work for the student (and their parents) to have just two mornings of structured instruction.
Or it could be that because the way the cohorts are formed, a student’s friends aren’t at school on the same days. Or it could be that disrupting the schedule this late in the year isn’t good. I’ve heard all of these from parents as the reasons why they don’t want in-person learning for their child right now.
Marco 2 years ago2 years ago
Since this article focuses so much on WCCUSD, we should probably note that the distance learning MOU that the district negotiated with its union sets impossible metrics that must be met before the district can even begin to plan for a return to school. Not “difficult” metrics, but literally impossible ones.
Michael 2 years ago2 years ago
Maybe that's because a return to school this year is realistically a horrible idea. The idea of returning to school, then teaching students a brand new model of school different from the model they are just now getting used to just in time for the end of the school year. I don't know about WCCUSD, but in LAUSD we had several families with several children sick with Covid. The current rate of infection is the … Read More
Maybe that’s because a return to school this year is realistically a horrible idea. The idea of returning to school, then teaching students a brand new model of school different from the model they are just now getting used to just in time for the end of the school year. I don’t know about WCCUSD, but in LAUSD we had several families with several children sick with Covid. The current rate of infection is the same as it was during the summer lockdown.
So how exactly is there a realistic return to this school year? Maybe it makes sense to do the best with what we’ve got, focus on vaccinating everyone before the beginning of summer, and then start the new school year fresh and ready to go instead of playing this dumb game of ping pong waiting for the rates to go up enough before we need to shut down again (just like Europe and Asia).
Ian CONNELLY 2 years ago2 years ago
Agree with Leah for sure. Also, why are school districts relying on votes instead of scientific data?
Dee 2 years ago2 years ago
I agree with you 100% Ian. My child has multiple health conditions and she will not be going back to the classroom setting anytime soon. Working at a school district previously, there is a high chance of children getting sick as they breathe the same air and less likely to wash their hands. I know it all too well. One of the things that come with the job is getting sick as well. Since Covid … Read More
I agree with you 100% Ian. My child has multiple health conditions and she will not be going back to the classroom setting anytime soon. Working at a school district previously, there is a high chance of children getting sick as they breathe the same air and less likely to wash their hands.
I know it all too well. One of the things that come with the job is getting sick as well. Since Covid came about March of last year, my child has not gotten sick this past year, compared to being in the classroom and getting sick 2-3 times a year.
3 feet is not enough distance with 30 plus children in one classroom. Unless all staff and children are vaccinated (which may take time for the child vaccine to become available) and there are adequate airflow systems in the classrooms, it is not safe to send all children back to the classroom. If some parents want to send their children back, then that is their choice. However, I believe parents should still have the option for distance learning and/or hybrid until we can see data that says we are close to having less than 100 cases in the State of California.
Until then, our family will continue the program we have in our household which seems to be working well as our child is not falling behind.
Leah Naomi Gonzales 2 years ago2 years ago
What none of these districts are saying is the truth. None of their “surveys”, have been fairly worded or even close to accurate as surveys should go? Almost all have leading questions such as if we were given clearance to return to school in a hybrid model for two days a week which times of day would you prefer, morning or afternoon?
That is not “Do you think your child should return to school now?”
Todd Maddison 2 years ago2 years ago
We’ve seen the same thing here, with surveys designed to get the answer a district wants.
I’ve been in charge of customer service before, I know how to design a survey to get a certain result, and that’s exactly what is happening…
Regrettable that none of the hyperlinks in the story seem to lead to anywhere you can actually see the survey questions and responses.