Alison Yin/EdSource
Special education has been a challenge for most districts, as certain services, such as occupational therapy, cannot be provided online.

As schools in California begin re-opening virtually, state education officials have taken steps to improve distance learning for a group of students who were largely left behind in the spring: Those in special education.

But some parents wonder if distance learning will ever work well for students with disabilities.

The most significant new law, passed in June as part of the state budget, requires districts to craft distance learning plans for all students in special education, tailored to each student’s unique needs. The plans will apply to any emergency that forces a school to close for 10 days or more, including wildfires, earthquakes and pandemics.

The plans will be part of a student’s individualized education program, or IEP. Teachers, parents, therapists, counselors and other staff will create the plan during a student’s regularly scheduled IEP review, if not sooner.

“Finally, there’s something for parents to point at that guarantees a distance learning plan as part of an IEP,” said Robert Borrelle, an attorney for Disability Rights California, a nonprofit that advocates for people with disabilities. “Before this, some districts were doing nothing.”

About 800,000 students in California are enrolled in special education. Some have IEPs, which are tailored to an individual student’s disability and often include special services, and others have 504 plans, which allow students with disabilities — usually learning disabilities — accommodations in a regular classroom.

Special education has been a challenge for school districts since March, when campuses closed due to the pandemic. Many students in special education receive occupational, speech or physical therapy — services that are nearly impossible to provide virtually. And some students, such as those with developmental disabilities or attention deficit disorder, have difficulty following lessons online.

The result was that some districts provided no online instruction for any students, for fear of getting sued by families of students in special education who believed their children weren’t receiving equal treatment.

That changed in April when the state and federal governments both mandated that districts with shuttered campuses provide online learning for all students, including those in special education. But services have been spotty in some districts, which prompted the new state law requiring all districts to adopt distance learning plans for special education students.

Matt Tamel, an attorney who represents school districts in special education cases, said the new state law provides some much-needed clarity in a realm that’s been, at times, “vague and confusing.”

“Districts are not just trying to follow state and federal guidelines, but guidance from the governor and county health departments, as well,” he said. “It’s a lot for districts to manage. It’s not easy.”

Another new law requires schools to give parents the option of keeping their children home even if campuses re-open, in cases where the children are medically fragile or especially vulnerable to contracting Covid-19. Schools would have to continue providing online learning in those cases.

But despite the new laws and guidelines, uncertainty looms in many districts as teachers, administrators and parents try to make sense of the requirements, said Noreen Ringlein, an advocate at Community Alliance for Special Education, a Bay Area nonprofit that helps parents navigate special education laws.

“It’s pretty much pandemonium,” she said. “Districts have worked really hard to figure this out, and parents need to be patient and reasonable. But at the same time, they need to hold districts accountable and make sure their children get the services they need.”

Numerous issues remain unresolved, she said, including:

  • Assessments to determine whether a child should be in special education. Initially many districts believed these should be held in person, but some are looking for ways to conduct these remotely.
  • Regular IEP meetings and teachers’ union contracts. It’s unclear in many districts whether teachers should conduct IEP meetings during their regular work day or after hours. An IEP meeting may last as long as two hours, and teachers may have dozens they need to complete.
  • Many districts are finding themselves without enough special education teachers, aides and psychologists to accommodate the demand created by distance learning. For example, students may need more 1-on-1 time online than they did in a classroom, because they’ve fallen behind or can’t focus during a Zoom class. Staffing shortages existed before the pandemic, but are more acute now as the need has grown. Without enough staff, it’s unclear how some districts are going to meet IEP requirements.

Meanwhile, occupational, speech and physical therapy remains a hurdle for most districts. Some districts are applying for waivers so they can offer special education services in-person on school campuses, and others are looking at ways to send therapists to students’ homes, Tamel said.

Tamel’s firm is advising districts against this, to protect the health of school staff. Instead, districts should work out alternatives with individual families, he said.

Rebekah Rocha, a charter school principal in Santa Rosa whose 11-year-old daughter is severely disabled, is doubtful that no matter how hard districts try, special education will ever work well remotely.

“The typical child in special education already struggles so much, and requires so much support,” she said. “Even in the best of circumstances, it’s hard. Some kids with mild disabilities might have some success with online learning, but for kids like my daughter, I honestly don’t see it working.”

Rocha’s daughter has struggled since she stopped attending school in person. Her behavior has worsened, and she’s lost important skills.

Rocha is trying to place her in in-person child care this fall, with a 1-on-1 aide, because she believes the benefits would outweigh the health risks.

“Having her home, trying to do remote learning, has been hard on all of us, including our other children,” Rocha said. “We’re trying to be optimistic and stay positive about this fall. But we need to be realistic.”

The stakes are particularly high for Moira Allbritton’s 17-year-old son, Charlie, who has autism, epilepsy and a traumatic brain injury. The San Diego teenager desperately wants to earn his high school diploma, and is worried that online learning will pose too many difficulties and he won’t graduate.

Before schools closed, he split his day between mainstream and special education classrooms. When his school first switched to virtual instruction, he didn’t worry too much about his academic performance because teachers weren’t issuing grades.

But this fall, students will start receiving grades again, and Charlie is nervous. His special education teachers have been “amazing,” Allbritton said, but his regular teachers have not had the time to see if Charlie is keeping up.

“Charlie might have made it with in-person classes, but now we don’t know,” said Allbritton, who also has an 11-year-old daughter with mild autism and three older children.

The uncertainty around her children’s schooling has been stressful on the whole family, she said. Her daughter has withdrawn emotionally and her son is frustrated that his academic dreams might be thwarted. It seems unfair, she said, that children whose parents have the time to monitor online classes will have a better shot at academic success than those who don’t, she said.

“I have moments where I want to extract them both from school and homeschool them,” she said. “It’s not that I’m a great teacher, but it would be one part of my life I have some control over, and we can put together a system that makes sense for us. There’s something alluring about that.”

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (4)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Steven Winter 1 month ago1 month ago

    Our daughter has been seeing a private speech pathologist virtually, with great results.
    We were lucky to have a private OT with the resources to make her in person therapy as safe as possible. We’ll have to see how these go with virtual school providers.

  2. Kathryn Lopez, MS, CCC-SLP 1 month ago1 month ago

    Meeting the needs of special education students through virtual learning is certainly a challenge. However, it is not true that speech therapy is "nearly impossible to provide virtually" as this article states. The American Speech-Language Hearing Association holds that "telepractice is an appropriate model of service delivery for audiologists and SLPs" (https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589934956&section=Key_Issues). Telepractice for speech and language services has been used in many settings, including schools, for years. A more accurate … Read More

    Meeting the needs of special education students through virtual learning is certainly a challenge. However, it is not true that speech therapy is “nearly impossible to provide virtually” as this article states. The American Speech-Language Hearing Association holds that “telepractice is an appropriate model of service delivery for audiologists and SLPs” (https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589934956&section=Key_Issues). Telepractice for speech and language services has been used in many settings, including schools, for years. A more accurate statement: Many students will benefit from telepractice speech and language sessions, but it is not an appropriate model for all students. This individual determination about service delivery should rely on the clinical expertise of the SLP as well as input from parents, administrators, and other members of the IEP team.

  3. Wyoming Irwin 1 month ago1 month ago

    Charlie’s “regular” teachers don’t have time to check up on him? So his special education teachers are his “irregular” teachers? I understand the use of this kind of language in non-education-specific journalism (although it still makes me cringe!), but not from edsource. Please! General education, not regular education.

  4. Noreen Ringlein 1 month ago1 month ago

    Thank you Carolyn / EdSource for delivering a good overview of the concerns facing parents and district staff members. In this new realm, we need to unpack the difficulties and work together to resolve them. A new issue popped up with PG &E's rolling power outages; so much for devices and assuring connectivity. This year will be far from dull. I encourage districts/parents, able to do so, (equity issue) to consider locating some "old school" … Read More

    Thank you Carolyn / EdSource for delivering a good overview of the concerns facing parents and district staff members. In this new realm, we need to unpack the difficulties and work together to resolve them. A new issue popped up with PG &E’s rolling power outages; so much for devices and assuring connectivity. This year will be far from dull. I encourage districts/parents, able to do so, (equity issue) to consider locating some “old school” grade level math work sheets and reading books/ essays with comprehension questions to be written and answered in journal form.