Long a goal of early childhood advocates, universal preschool came a step closer to becoming reality this week.
Assemblyman Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, a veteran advocate for early education, and other legislators on Tuesday proposed a sweeping suite of bills to help reform the state’s early childhood system. The bills seek to expand transitional kindergarten to all 4-year-olds, make child care more affordable by creating a sliding scale for family fees, increase reimbursement rates for preschool teachers and bar expulsions and suspensions in preschool.
McCarty, who has championed universal preschool and other reforms for many years, stressed that this was an initial rollout and that more specifics regarding implementation and funding would follow over time.
“This education package aims to lift up working families and our kids throughout California. We all know that early education matters for kindergarten readiness, to make sure our kids are ready to thrive when they enter a public school system, and for moms trying to go to work or go to school themselves,” said McCarty, chairman of the Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance, during a press conference on the legislation. “We see it crystal clear during COVID-19 how much early education and child care impacts our economy.”
The bill package, which helps pave the way for Gov. Gavin Newsom’s recently released 10-year early education roadmap, the Master Plan for Early Learning and Care, was lauded by those concerned with early childhood education and care in California, a state with almost 3 million children under 5.
“It’s clear that our youngest children need more support now than ever,” said Patricia Lozano, executive director of Early Edge California, an education nonprofit that is co-sponsoring part of the legislation. “We want to be able to serve all the kids who need these services the most.”
These wide-ranging reform initiatives come in response to longstanding concerns that of all the systems of education, early education has been the most inconsistent and inaccessible to many of California’s low-income children, experts say. It also speaks to a growing understanding that the early years are critical to brain development, forming the foundation for lifelong academic and career success.
“There’s no doubt that early childhood education providers and families statewide need immediate help, so it’s critical that California takes steps both to stabilize the fragile field, expand services for families,” said Ted Lempert, president of Children Now, “and discontinue policies that perpetuate and exacerbate inequities and leave us behind the nation as other states continue to move ahead with real supports for young children.”
More specifics are called for, childhood advocates say, to determine how much impact the policies will have.
“The Devil will be in the details,” agreed Khieem Jackson, founder of Black Men for Educational Equity, an advocacy group. “However, we are pleased to see Assembly members McCarty and Rubio’s commitment to bolstering equity by working to eliminate bias and inequitable practices within the early learning and care system. These policy proposals have the potential to benefit millions of children.”
Assembly Bill 22, the expansion of transitional kindergarten to all 4-year-olds, which legislators say would largely be paid for through Proposition 98, which provides funding for K-12 education, is at the core of this bill package. However, some advocates maintain that there is not enough clarity yet on how the programs will be paid for.
“We really appreciate the leadership the Legislature is taking on early care and education — many important issues are tackled in this package of bills,” Lempert said. “But we need to ensure that we’re pairing these key ideas with additional, new investments, not investments that come at the expense of other kids’ services. If kids are truly prioritized in California, this state can afford both significant additional investments in early ed and K-12.”
Expanding transitional kindergarten, which is designed to be a bridge between preschool and kindergarten, will ensure that there is an even playing field for all children, advocates say, as they enter kindergarten.
“It makes no sense that only one quarter of 4-year-olds are provided access to an additional year of kindergarten,” said Kerry Woods, chair of the political action group for the California School Employees Association. “Expanding transitional kindergarten to all California’s 4-year-olds is the right thing to do, and we should do it now, as study after study shows that providing quality early education for our children prepares them for future educational and personal success.”
Currently, transitional kindergarten is only available to 4-year-olds who turn 5 between Sept. 2 and Dec. 2, a short window.
“We know that transitional kindergarten works. It’s been around for 10 years now in California and research shows that it makes a tremendous difference for all students, of all income levels who have been through transitional kindergarten,” said McCarty. “We’ve had essentially a pilot project for 10 years.”
Another critical part of the package is Assembly Bill 92, which would create a sliding scale for family fees for child care. The annual cost of care for an infant in a licensed child care center in California last year was more than $15,000, for instance, according to the California Budget and Policy Center.
“Any legislation that will boost resources for families with low incomes is a step in the right direction,” said Kristin Schumacher, senior policy analyst for the California Budget and Policy Center, a nonprofit research organization. “Many of these families have very low incomes, and any relief in the way of fees will allow them to direct their resources to other high-ticket items like rent, transportation, or even supplies for the children like formula and diapers.”
The steep cost of child care has only worsened during the pandemic, as almost 6,000 family child care providers have been forced to close their doors this year, according to Child Care Providers United, a union coalition.
“This would ease the burden on families,” said Assemblywoman Eloise Reyes, D-San Bernardino. “On a limited income, many families struggle to afford the cost of child care while providing for basic needs such as food and housing.”
Raising wages for preschool teachers and other caregivers is also a key part of addressing the inequities of the child care system, experts say.
“The fact is our caregivers and teachers are woefully underpaid,” said Scott Moore, head of Kidango, a nonprofit organization that runs many Bay Area child care centers. “We need to raise rates so that it is possible to earn a professional wage.”
Other elements of the reform package include Senate Bill 50, sponsored by Sen. Monique Limon, D-Santa Barbara, which intends to create a more streamlined framework of programs for children from birth to age 6, and a bill that would make kindergarten mandatory.
Another key bill would bar expulsions and suspensions in subsidized early learning programs. Children in preschool programs are expelled at a much higher rate than students in K-12, said Assemblywoman Blanca Rubio, D-Baldwin Park, a former school teacher, who is co-sponsoring the bill.
Equity is at the core of the issue. African American children, for example, are prone to receive harsher discipline than other students who display the same behavior, studies show.
“Children of color, of course, are disproportionately affected,” Rubio said. “We must address all of these injustices. If children are not getting the support they need, the programs are futile.”
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Manoja Weerakoon 2 years ago2 years ago
I am a childcare provider in Southern California. Childcare businesses are one field that is mostly owned and operated by women. During the pandemic when all the state daycare centers and public schools were closed at a short notice to the parents, private daycares were there to support the essential workers by taking care of their children. But at the state and federal level, every focus is to make the public sector daycares bigger than … Read More
I am a childcare provider in Southern California. Childcare businesses are one field that is mostly owned and operated by women. During the pandemic when all the state daycare centers and public schools were closed at a short notice to the parents, private daycares were there to support the essential workers by taking care of their children. But at the state and federal level, every focus is to make the public sector daycares bigger than investing in women-owned small businesses. I strongly feel if more funds and support are given to small childcare providers we will be able to provide better education and quality care to children birth to 6 years. Many caregivers are leaving this field as they are not making enough money to survive in this competitive, stressful, and demanding environment. The state should give more funds to the private sector so the early childcare providers can be paid a decent salary and we can attract qualified and experienced staff. Parents should receive a 100% tax refund on tuition paid and subsidized childcare should be accessible to more parents. The present income cut-off rate to qualify for state assistance is very unrealistic. It is the birthright of every American child to receive quality care and education. Birth to 6 years is the most vulnerable years of a child. We know the plight of our public school education. Are we still making the “government” larger and entrusting our most vulnerable small individuals to their care. Or have a balance by empowering the small businesses as we proved how dependable we were during the pandemic. I do not see the active involvement of the private sector in any of these decisions made by politicians. It is a top to bottom approach. Policies are made without any grassroots level feedback from individuals who are living and know what is happening in this industry. The focus is on bigger government and no idea how sustainable the policies are going to be. The impact on our children, parents, and thousands of women whose livelihood depends on this industry. These individuals who make these policies should work with very young children for few days to see how much care, love, and work it takes to provide quality care and education to very young children. Do not underestimate the work of childcare providers and think state-operated institutions can do their work.
sam mar 2 years ago2 years ago
All I can say is good luck USA, you need a miracle and it was not D. Trump nor will it be J. Biden/K. Harris. Years ago, I taught preschool in China and helped prepare them from the entrance exam for Kindergarten. In China, children are required to know the following PRIOR to enrollment in public kindergarten: Recite 20 Chinese poems from memory, Single Digit Multiplication and Division, Read a simple textbook in English language, … Read More
All I can say is good luck USA, you need a miracle and it was not D. Trump nor will it be J. Biden/K. Harris.
Years ago, I taught preschool in China and helped prepare them from the entrance exam for Kindergarten.
In China, children are required to know the following PRIOR to enrollment in public kindergarten:
Recite 20 Chinese poems from memory, Single Digit Multiplication and Division,
Read a simple textbook in English language, physically navigate an obstacle course, identify the steps in which food is produced….
Also; the children have to publicly state they will defend motherland from all foreign invaders.
Holly Gold 2 years ago2 years ago
Yet another "solution" that is made without Early Childhood Education providers in the room. Again, the success of preschool is used to create 4-year-old classrooms in K-12 schools that are already failing in so many ways. There is a long successful field of Early Childhood Education that has been underfunded from day 1. If you believe in preschool for all, then don't destroy the field that provides it by essentially turning us into toddler childcare. … Read More
Yet another “solution” that is made without Early Childhood Education providers in the room. Again, the success of preschool is used to create 4-year-old classrooms in K-12 schools that are already failing in so many ways. There is a long successful field of Early Childhood Education that has been underfunded from day 1. If you believe in preschool for all, then don’t destroy the field that provides it by essentially turning us into toddler childcare. Fund the thousands of programs that have been doing successfully to serve more children. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ohs/about/history-of-head-start
Manoja Weerakoon 2 years ago2 years ago
Agree. Plans made in air-conditioned, comfortable chairs. They are not in touch with reality. Now our most vulnerable small individuals are at stake.
Paul Meyers 2 years ago2 years ago
I would hope that before we expand TK that we first invest in ensuring kindergarten is offered at full day to all students in California. And to do that we need to restore the kindergarten full-day facilities grant in the 2021-22 budget. Without help with facilities, there is no place to put these kids. Schools want to educate for a 4 year olds, but we don’t have the space.
SD Parent 2 years ago2 years ago
Let's call TK what it is – expensive, state-sponsored pre-school/daycare – so why not convert all TK to preschool for all? Unlike preschools and daycare centers, which are open, TK is currently being run largely as "remote learning" with the children sitting at home in front of a screen learning nothing. This online instruction is most prevalent in school districts with large populations of the most disadvantaged students, who are arguably the target of … Read More
Let’s call TK what it is – expensive, state-sponsored pre-school/daycare – so why not convert all TK to preschool for all? Unlike preschools and daycare centers, which are open, TK is currently being run largely as “remote learning” with the children sitting at home in front of a screen learning nothing. This online instruction is most prevalent in school districts with large populations of the most disadvantaged students, who are arguably the target of AB 22. (Think LAUSD and SDUSD.)
The Legislature needs to put pressure on school districts – and the employee unions that are refusing to return to school sites – to reopen schools; otherwise AB 22 will merely be a wasted effort to expand screen time to more 4-year olds.
Lawrence 2 years ago2 years ago
Thank you! This was a great comment.