Policy & Finance > State Education Policy

Brown plan to delay "transitional kindergarten" triggers uncertainty in many school districts


Photo by Anissa Thompson

Photo by Anissa Thompson

Governor Jerry Brown’s proposal to delay implementation of “transitional kindergarten” for 4-year-olds has triggered doubt and confusion in many school districts around the state.

One district — San Francisco Unified School District  — has announced that it will not offer the program.  Preschool advocates believe it is the only one to have done so so far.

But several other districts contacted by EdSource, including some of California’s largest, say they plan to offer the program, contingent on legislative action in response to Brown’s proposal in his January budget.

Long Beach Unified indicates it will offer the program no matter what. Others like Lodi Unified will only do so depending on what happens in Sacramento. Yet others like Capistrano Unified have yet to make a decision.

Parents typically at this time of year sign up for kindergarten for the fall — and now as a result of Brown’s proposal, for the parents of the approximately 40,000 children who will still be 4-years-old in November, there is uncertainty  as to what will be available for them.

The uncertainty is because the Legislature still has to take action on Brown’s proposal — and Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, the lead sponsor of the legislation (SB 1381) that created transitional kindergarten,  is opposed to Brown’s plan to squelch the program for budgetary reasons.

Transitional kindergarten was due to begin this fall. Under the law, an estimated 40,000 students who were still 4 in November, and who would normally have been allowed to enroll in regular kindergarten this fall, would have the option of enrolling in transitional kindergarten, and then in regular kindergarten next year.

According to the legislation, in the following two years, some 80,000 additional students who were still 4 in September and October would also be barred from regular kindergarten, but would have the option of enrolling in transitional kindergarten. One rationale is that on average children who start kindergarten later do better academically as measured on math and reading scores by the time they enter 1st grade, according to research from the Rand Corporation.

Long Beach Unified, which already had one of the more extensive transitional kindergarten programs in the state, will continue offering those classes, according to district spokesperson Chris Eftychiou.

Chino Unified will do the same. However, said the district’s Vicki Broberg, “Should the governor overturn the legislation, and not require transitional kindergarten, we will not be able to offer it to our students to the budget constraints we are under.”

San Bernardino City Unified “is going forward with plans to offer transitional kindergarten” said Linda Bardere, the district’s director of communications, but only “contingent upon funding.”  In the meantime, it is enrolling students, and will continue to do so.

Clovis Unified’s Kelly Avants said that the district “exploring ways to continue to provide kindergarten services to children.”

“Transitional kindergarten is still in the law, and therefore we are making every effort to identify ways to meet the educational needs of these students,” she said.

Lodi Unified is taking a wait-and-see attitude, said Catherine Pennington, the district’s assistant superintendent for elementary education. The school district has done all its planning in anticipation of offering transitional kindergarten in the fall, but “we are currently waiting to see how the funding of transitional kindergarten plays out in the governor’s budget in the May revision,” she said, referring to the revised budget Gov Brown will announce in mid-May.

In the meantime, the district is taking the names of students who will be 4 in November, and “will invite them to register if we are able to move forward with our plans.”

At Corona-Norco Unified, “as transitional kindergarten is still in law, we are moving forward with planning of implementation next year,” said Barbara Wolfinbarger, the district’s director of elementary curriculum and instruction.

At the same time, the district is holding off buying instructional materials or incurring any other costs until the funding situation becomes clear, she said.

Even San Francisco, which announced on January 25 that “effective immediately” it would not be offering transitional kindergarten in the fall, and that only students turning 5 years old on or before November 1 will be eligible for kindergarten entry,” has also drawn up contingency plans if the Legislature fails to endorse Brown’s proposal.

If the state mandates transitional kindergarten, it will be offered at only two sites in the city, which will make reaching them difficult for many parents in a city the size of San Francisco. But children who have not turned 5 by next November will still be barred from attending regular kindergarten. That would represent a change from current practice when children who only turn 5 anytime before December 1 are eligible for regular kindergarten.

For more background on transitional kindergarten, see these EdSource edposts:

California Gears Up For Extra Year of Kindergarten

Brown’s Budget Could Increase Class Sizes and Exclude Tens of Thousands from Kindergarten

Opposition to Brown Proposal to Postpone Transitional Kindergarten Grows

Filed under: State Education Policy, Transitional Kindergarten

Tags: ,

Comments

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments. EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

3 Responses to “Brown plan to delay "transitional kindergarten" triggers uncertainty in many school districts”

EdSource does not track who "likes or dislikes" a comment. We only track the number of likes and dislikes.

  1. Deborah Kong on January 31, 2012 at 12:16 pm01/31/2012 12:16 pm

    • 000

    It is true that the list of supporters of transitional kindergarten is far longer than just one group. In fact, the partial list includes:

    Julia Brownley, Chair, Assembly Committee on Education
    Assemblymember Susan Bonilla
    Assemblymember Julia Brownley
    Assemblymember Luis Alejo
    Assemblymember Ricardo Lara
    Advancement Project
    AARP
    Alliance for a Better Community
    California Department of Education
    California Federation of Teachers
    California Kindergarten Association
    Children Now
    East LA Community Corporation
    Families in Schools
    Fight Crime: Invest in Kids California
    First 5 Fresno County
    Fresno County Office of Education
    Fresno Unified School District
    InnerCity Struggle
    Jump Start
    Kingsburg Elementary Charter School District
    Kingsburg Joint Union School District
    Los Angeles County Office of Education
    Los Angeles Unified School District
    Los Angeles Urban League
    National Council of La Raza
    Oakland Unified School District
    Parent Institute for Quality Education
    Sacramento City Unified School District
    Sacramento County Office of Education
    San Diego Unified School District
    Small School District Association
    The Education Trust-West
    Woodville Union School District
    Senator Joe Simitian

    Regarding the research, it shows clearly that eliminating TK is bad for children, parents, schools and our state. Here is a recent op-ed from Stanford University School of Education professor Deborah Stipek on why cutting TK is a nonstarter: http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_19753698.

    Her original research cites findings that “children who were in school gained more in a year than children who were not in school.” (See page 10 of the study: http://www.preschoolcalifornia.org/resources/resource-files/at-what-age-should-children.pdf)

  2. Peggy Dodge on January 27, 2012 at 11:30 pm01/27/2012 11:30 pm

    • 000

    “According to the legislation, in the following two years, some 80,000 additional students who were still 4 in September and October would also be barred from regular kindergarten, but would have the option of enrolling in transitional kindergarten. One rationale is that on average children who start kindergarten later do better academically as measured on math and reading scores by the time they enter 1st grade, according to research from the Rand Corporation.”

    Important to note that the Rand research cited here has nothing to do with Transitional Kindgerten as proposed in California. It is strictly research documenting advantages of rolling back the age eligibility date.

    There is no research to indicate that the transitional kindergarten model proposed in California (elementary credentialed teachers, potential group size and ratio of 33 children to 1 adult) will be at all beneficial to these children. There is substantial research indicating that quality child care programs (which are mandated in state funded California programs to have a ratio of 8 children to 1 adult) have multiple positive effects on later achievement for children.

    Please broaden your coverage of this issue.

  3. Peggy Dodge on January 27, 2012 at 11:24 pm01/27/2012 11:24 pm

    • 000

    Please stop using the term “preschool advocates” as a general term when discussing transitional kindergarten. Preschool California is one group that is vocal and supportive of Transitional Kindergarten. However, they do not speak for the broader voice of “preschool advocates”. After all, Preschool California was a main player in getting the legislation rolling back the kindergarten start date to create this new program called transitional kindergarten.

    Do your research. “Preschool Advocates” are divided on transitional kindergarten and much more concerned about proposals that would reduce funding for state preschool and subsidized child care programs. One proposal on the table could result in the elimination of Community College campus based child care programs – programs that serve both as lab schools for training preschool teachers and as a suppot to allow parents of preschoolers to pursue community college education.

Template last modified: