Policy & Finance > State Education Policy

Budget shortfall heightens threat of shorter school year


Photo by Tiffany Szerpicki

Photo by Tiffany Szerpicki

The prospect of many California public school students experiencing a shorter school year was heightened by the release on Wednesday of a grim report from the Legislative Analyst’s Office predicting a severe budget shortfall.

The bad news comes just as several districts were able to restore days they had previously trimmed from their instructional calendar, according to a just-completed EdSource survey of the state’s 30 largest districts.

EdSource found that 18 of the state’s 30 largest districts still have the once-standard 180-day instructional year. Eight of those districts restored days this school year. A dozen have less than a 180-day year, with nine of them having the 175-day minimum.

In 2008, the Legislature gave districts the option of reducing the school year to 175 days as a way to manage state-imposed budget cuts. Under legislation signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in June, if revenues declined by $2 billion or more this year, school districts’ budgets would be cut, and schools would be given the right to reduce their instructional calendar to 168 days this year.

Typically, the way a school district shortens its school year is by giving teachers unpaid furlough days. With the $2 billion shortfall now a real possibility, any reduction in the school calendar would have to be negotiated with teachers’ unions.

A school year of 168 days would put California behind every state except Colorado and Michigan, although several states calculate their school year in hours not days, so comparing can be difficult.

It would also put the state behind many industrialized countries. Australia, Netherlands and Singapore, for example, offer a school year of 200 days. Korea’s school year is 220 days, and Switzerland’s is 225. In addition, recent cutbacks in summer school programs as documented in an earlier EdSource survey has further reduced instructional time in the United States.

Some districts told EdSource that they would have to reopen negotiations with their unions to revise contracts already agreed to if the automatic trigger were to take effect. Others, such as Stockton Unified, are already negotiating with their teachers’ unions as to what will happen if the district experiences mid-year cuts in state funding. “The main thing on the table is furlough days,” said Julie Penn, a deputy superintendent in Stockton.

It is not yet a done deal that districts will shrink their school year. For cuts to happen, the Department of Finance must issue a projection by the middle of next month similar to the Legislative Analyst’s. The Legislature could also act to change the way the cuts are imposed, but that would require approval from Gov. Brown.

But it seems increasingly likely that budget reductions of some kind will have to be made, as Director of Finance Ana Matosantos asserted yesterday. If school cuts get imposed as called for in last June’s budget legislation, districts could try to trim programs in any number of ways in lieu of shortening the school year. However, cutting school days yields significant savings, which makes it more appealing to school boards in lieu of chipping away at a variety of school programs.

Whatever occurs, it will be painful, said State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson in a statement yesterday.

“If the Legislative Analyst’s forecast proves correct, mid-year cuts will bring yet another painful blow to California’s schools,” Torlakson said.

How does California’s school year compare with other states? See this report from the Education Commission of the States. For a chart on the length of the instructional year in California’s largest thirty districts, see this EdSource report. 

 

Filed under: State Education Policy

Tags: , ,

Comments

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments. EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

3 Responses to “Budget shortfall heightens threat of shorter school year”

EdSource does not track who "likes or dislikes" a comment. We only track the number of likes and dislikes.

  1. Roque Burio, Jr. on December 28, 2011 at 10:24 pm12/28/2011 10:24 pm

    • 000

    From Roque Burio Jr the ugly duckling and the branded lemon that can dance but can also sing. Here is my song for the LAUSD and UTLA on local stabilization, autonomy, and empowerment of schools: The new façades of the failing LAUSD as to mention the local stabilization with local autonomy and empowerment is better known collectively as the grass root reform in socialist countries; but, Mr. Deasy and Mr. Fletcher, we are not a socialist country—we are a democratic capitalist country where definitely your new façades, to white wash your underperforming and failing school district, will never work and will only look too hilarious to those who know and understand that grass root reform.
    In a democratic capitalist society like USA the reform has to be formulated by the legislature and enforced by the executive department to which the LAUSD is a part thereof. In short the reform must come from above and not from below. Be natural and do not pretend otherwise.

  2. Roque Burio Jr. on December 5, 2011 at 10:34 pm12/5/2011 10:34 pm

    • 000

    From Roque burio Jr. the lemon who can dance and sing:
    Here is the truthful song about the secret project of LAUSD that sacrificed us old and veterans teacher and the reasons why they falsely evaluated, falsely accused, and falsely charged us and subjected us to a fraudulent process of dismissal and to fraudulent settlement of cases against us are as follows: one, To cover up the financial and academic failures of LAUSD; two, obtain a legislations that are more anti-teachers and justify its various violations of existing laws and the constitutional provisions; and thirdly, to obtain additional funding through extension of taxes.
    But before we add more funding to the failing LAUSD, we should ask what happened to the previous funding? How did LAUSD spend its budget? Why did it fail financially and academically for several years now? Perhaps it is better to dismantle this dismayingly failing LAUSD and replace it with city schools or private schools while the government financially supports all students. The students should have the final choice if the will attend city schools of private schools.

  3. Rosalyn on November 18, 2011 at 8:24 am11/18/2011 8:24 am

    • 000

    What are we doing to our youth? What are we doing to their future? What are we doing to our country? Countries with an uneducated population suffer from poverty, loss of democracy, loss of scientific and technological innovations…all this because California legislators do not want to raise taxes!!!!

    I would bet that most Californians would not think twice about increase taxes as opposed to loss of their children’s education,

Template last modified: