Days after the news that federal Head Start programs in California will be serving thousands fewer children this year, the California Department of Education announced that state preschool programs will be serving thousands more children this school year.

The final state budget included an additional $30 million for state preschool programs and $25 for other child care programs that went toward restoring the $1 billion in lost funding since 2008. More than 100,000 children have been cut from the state’s preschool and child care rolls in that time, according to the Legislative Analysts’ Office. Now, part of that money has been disbursed and will result in 8,300, or 8 percent, of the spots opening up again.

This is the first increase in child care spots the state has seen in years, but it will not be enough to serve all the eligible children. Both Head Start and state preschool programs report long waiting lists for their services.

Head Start has said it will lose 5,600 slots in California because of the federal budget cuts called sequester; it is unclear how the additional state slots might offset that loss in individual communities. The state and federal programs also vary in scope: Head Start Programs offer a range of education and health services for children up to age 5 whose families live below that poverty line. In contrast, state preschool is typically a half-day academic program for 4- and 5-year-olds whose families live at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty line. There has been some debate about which program is more effective, though the programs themselves often work closely together. Many child care centers offer both state and Head Start services at the same location.

Lillian Mongeau covers early childhood education. Contact her or follow her @lrmongeau.


Filed under: Early Learning, Head Start, Kindergarten and Preschool, Quick Hits

Comment Policy

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments.


EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. Kim Gunter says:

    Why is it that the ECE teachers in the Twin Rivers Unified School District are getting a pay cut when the funding for ECE has been restored? How can a school district pay an administrator $140,000 to run the ECE department and cut teachers pay by up to 60%? Where is the equity?