More students from Los Angeles Unified attend charter schools than from any other district in America – by far. The 98,576 students who enrolled in charters last year, up a significant 24 percent from 2010-11, were more than double the 48,057 students from New York City, the nation’s largest district and number two in charter attendance. Nearly one out of seven LAUSD students now attend charters.

The annual report by the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools found that 2 million students – nearly 5 percent of the nation’s public school population – enrolled in charters last year, with 610,000 on waiting lists. In seven districts, more than 30 percent of students attend charters, led by post-Katrina New Orleans, where three-quarters of students are in charters, and Detroit and Washington, D.C., both with 41 percent of students in charters. The numbers do not include students enrolled in online charters.

Los Angeles Unified has the most students attending charter schools:  98,576 of its 661,000 students or 15 percent. Source: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (Click to enlarge.)

Los Angeles Unified has the most students attending charter schools: 98,576 of its 661,000 students, or 15 percent. Source: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (Click to enlarge.)

Grossmont Union High School District has the largest proportion of charter students among California districts: 21 percent (4,884 of 23,570). Large districts with sizable market share are Oakland (18 percent), Los Angeles (15 percent) and San Diego (10 percent). Sixteen districts in California have at least 10 percent of students in charters.

Last month, the California Charter Schools Association reported that as of this fall, 484,000 students – about 8 percent of the state’s K-12 enrollment – attend 1,065 charters, up 109 schools from last year. Despite state budget cuts for all schools, federal grants of up to $575,000 in startup and initial operating capital have continued to enable new charters to get off the ground.

 


Filed under: Charter Schools, Featured, Quick Hits

Comment Policy

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments.


EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. And yet it has become increasingly difficult to get approval for charters outside of the now-standard model, which implies that innovation is beginning to flag in the charter movement as in other parts of contemporary American culture. The standard charter model has become an enabler of a two-tiered education system, with an upper tier for the wealthier and more privileged and a lower tier for those minorities that accrue sympathy but not equal opportunity. Try to get a charter approved that offers the poor (and everyone else) the kind of education the wealthy commonly access in private schools, and watch the usual charter supporters fade away. This educational model separation borders on apartheid, and is promoted both by established, self-interested districts and by the mainstream charter movement that has lost interest in attracting cultural and socioeconomic diversity into its schools.