Brown signs bill moving API away from standardized tests

Senate Bill 1458, which will shift California’s chief measure of a high school’s performance, from a near exclusive reliance on state test scores to a broader gauge of student accomplishment and preparation for college and the world of work, is now law.

After Gov. Jerry Brown signed the bill Wednesday, its sponsor, Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, predicted in a press release that the bill “will prove to be one of the most significant education reform bills of the decade.”

Starting in 2016, test results of the California Standards Tests will comprise no more than 60 percent of a high school’s Academic Performance Index, or API, the three-digit score that, next to a school’s mascot, has become its identity. Less prescriptive than last year’s version of the bill, which Brown vetoed with a caustic message, SB 1458 doesn’t dictate what the other elements comprising the 40 percent (or more) will be; the bill leaves that up to the State Board of Education and the Superintendent of Public Instruction to determine. But it does makes clear that those measures should reflect success in preparing students for higher education and the workplace. Steinberg has said these elements might include high school and middle school graduation and dropout rates, or factors such as the proportion of students who pass Advanced Placement exams, are eligible for a four-year state university (complete the A-G course requirements), graduate without need for college remediation in English and math, or have completed a Partnership Academy program in a career pathway and qualified for college credit in that area.

State tests would comprise at least 60 percent* of an API score for middle and elementary schools under the bill. However, science and history, which currently are given little weight – science is tested only in fifth and eight grades – would have more emphasis. State Supt. Tom Torlakson would report to the Legislature next year on how that could be done.

SB 1458 reflected widespread frustration that the heavy weight given to multiple-choice reading and math exams was narrowing the focus on what was taught, encouraged weeks of test prep, and distorted priorities, with science, the arts, and vocational and career tech programs given short shrift. That’s why SB 1458 had strong support in the business community, with regional workforce organizations and the California Manufacturers and Technology Association among those behind it.

“This is a big step in improving the expectations we have for schools and the outcomes we want for students,” said Christopher Cabaldon, executive director of the Linked Learning Alliance, in a press release. The Alliance works to expand and integrate job internships and real-world career tech programs in high schools.

The bill also:

  • Includes an option that Brown raised last year: formal school inspections or visitations that would observe quality of teaching and take the pulse of less tangible qualities of a school: ties to the community, parental involvement, extracurricular life, the overall school culture. State Supt. Tom Torlakson would be authorized to establish school inspections if money is made available, thus shifting the burden back to Brown to make room in the state budget for them.
  • Instructs Torlakson to make recommendations a year from now on ways to replace the system that ranks schools by deciles and compares them with other schools with similar student demographics. It’s been used to determine which schools are eligible for various state and federal programs and which should face academic sanctions.

SB 1458 coincides with a period of great change. The state is transitioning to the Common Core standards in math and English language arts, with new standardized tests that are two years away. The state will also adopt new science standards, with assessments that have yet to be written. In November, the California Department of Education will report to the Legislature which standardized tests should be eliminated and which should be elevated in importance, such as science. Those recommendations could affect the composition of the API under Steinberg’s bill. With so much in flux, SB 1458 gives Torlakson and the state Board four years to institute changes to the API.

* an early version  of the post had an incorrect figure. See comment below.

Filed under: Common Core, Expanded Learning, Hot Topics, State Education Policy, STEM, Testing and Accountability

Tags: , , , , ,


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment Policy

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers.

  • To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective.
  • Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to.
  • EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and offensive comments.
  • EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.
  • Please limit comments to 250 words to prevent comment clutter; if you intend to say more please link out to a place that contains your full comment.
  • Comments with more than one link automatically enter moderation. Comments from new commenters are automatically moderated.
  • Repeated violation of this comment policy will lead to a warning. Continued violations will lead to a ban.

4 Responses to “Brown signs bill moving API away from standardized tests”

EdSource does not track who "likes or dislikes" a comment. We only track the number of likes and dislikes.

  1. navigio on Sep 27, 2012 at 11:09 am09/27/2012 11:09 am

    • 000

    “State tests would comprise at least 40 percent of an API score for middle and elementary schools under the bill.”

    I think that should be 60%..?

    “(G) Results of the achievement test and other tests specified in
    subdivision (b) shall constitute at least 60 percent of the value of
    the index for primary schools and middle schools.”


    • John Fensterwald on Sep 27, 2012 at 11:49 am09/27/2012 11:49 am

      • 000

      Thanks, Navigio. You are right.

  2. Hilary McLean on Sep 27, 2012 at 10:59 am09/27/2012 10:59 am

    • 000

    Totally agree Rob. The good news is that the National Academy Foundation, working with WestEd, and other members of the Linked Learning Alliance who are committed to improving college and career readiness for all students have made some strides in this arena — particularly in the area of career readiness — that can inform California’s work.

  3. Rob Manwaring on Sep 27, 2012 at 7:24 am09/27/2012 7:24 am

    • 000

    Congratulations to those who worked so hard to get this bill passed. This is a great first step towards transforming the state’s accountability system. Now the hard work begins for the State Board to figure out what additional elements to include and how to include them. Starting in 1999, the API statute required the state to include graduation rates, but for data reasons and then political will reasons, it never happened. Statute for several years has required the state to begin to incorporate a measure of student academic growth, but that too has never happened. So, while yesterday’s bill signing should be celebrated, the hard work is really just beginning.

Template last modified: