School districts across the country are increasingly turning to four-day school weeks to save money, increase student attendance and recruit new teachers. But the trend isn’t taking hold in California. Only two tiny, remote California school districts, Leggett Valley Unified in Mendocino County and Big Sur Unified in Monterey County, have shortened the week for students.
The four-day week isn’t feasible for most schools in the state. California’s Education Code requires schools to hold classes five days a week or have their funding reduced. Over the years state legislators have given exemptions to a handful of school districts in remote areas of California, although they must still meet the requirement for annual instructional minutes. Some of the districts that gained approval for a four-day week have reverted to a five-day schedule and others never instituted the truncated week.
The state of California gave Leggett Valley Unified permission to operate on a four-day schedule almost 14 years ago. Students at Whale Gulch School were the first in the district to move to a shortened week. The off-the-grid school, in the area known as the Lost Coast, serves 50 students in kindergarten through 12th grade. The school generates electricity with solar panels, and water is kept in storage tanks fed by a pipe that brings stream water from the top of a mountain through a “crazy filtration system,” said Superintendent Jeff Ritchley.
Leggett Valley School, which serves 75 students, moved to the four-day schedule five years ago. The town of Leggett, near the Eel River, has a post office, fire station and two small businesses, as well as the famous drive-through giant coast redwood called the Chandelier Tree. The closest town is about 45 minutes away.
“No one wants to go back,” Ritchley said of the four-day week. “There would be a riot. I guarantee both communities would go all the way to Sacramento. They would. All 150 people would caravan to talk to them (lawmakers).”
Ritchley says the four-day week meets the needs of families in the district, allowing them extra time for errands, such as taking children to doctor’s visits, which often require them to travel long distances. It also has helped the district recruit and retain teachers, and saves staff the cost of an additional day of commuting, he said.
Despite its growing popularity across the nation, four-day school weeks are controversial. The truncated school schedule allows for additional flexibility for school staff and families, but students on four-day schedules typically go to school for fewer hours and score lower on English language arts and math tests, according to research.
At the beginning of 2020 there were 650 U.S. school districts on a four-day schedule, and now there are 850, said Paul Thompson, an associate professor of economics at Oregon State University who has done extensive research on the topic. Ninety percent of the schools are in rural areas and 10% are in suburban or urban neighborhoods, he said. In 2020 Texas, had no school districts on a four-day schedule, Thompson said, and now there are nearly 50.
Four-day schedules offer greater flexibility
Thompson says that the most significant benefit of a four-day week is that it offers flexibility to district administrators, teachers and students.
Teachers in four-day districts are usually on the clock on the day that students are out of school, although working on campus is often optional, Thompson said. Teachers use the time for grading or class preparation. They take professional development courses or teach remedial courses to students trying to catch up. Some teachers also use the day to take care of personal appointments and errands that would have meant a day off work and the need for a substitute, he said.
“Reducing teacher absences is one thing districts hoped to gain,” Thompson said.
Students in high school reap the greatest benefits from the schedule, allowing them to take jobs or internships, or take advantage of other experiential opportunities, he said.
Ritchley often uses the extra day without students to attend to maintenance at the schools, which are closed on different days. On a recent Monday he was at Whale Gulch School placing sandbags around buildings and using flexible pipes to change the water direction of downspouts to keep the campus safe from flooding during the recent storms.
Parents, students, teachers and administrators surveyed by researchers give the four-day week high marks. A focus group of teachers told researchers at Oregon State University that they generally liked the four-day instruction model. It was the reason many decided to go to work or remain employed at a specific district.
Ritchley said he wouldn’t consider working at a school with a five-day schedule now and would like to see other schools apply for permission to shorten their school weeks.
“Being an employee myself, being a teacher and school administrator myself, it’s a healthier lifestyle,” he said. “They are really missing out.”
Fewer hours mean lower grades, research shows
But there are drawbacks to the schedule, including evidence of lower grades for students who attend school for fewer hours. Students on four-day schedules average 148 school days a year and go to school 35 to 60 hours less a year than students who attend school five days a week, according to research by Thompson and others. Students on a four-day schedule, especially those with the least hours in school, have lower English language arts and math scores than students on a five-day schedule.
“Schools that drop three or four hours a week out of their students’ time in school, those are the places that we see those big drops (in grades),” Thompson said. “In districts that have maintained instructional time we don’t see much impact.”
Students in elementary school and middle school that switched to a four-day schedule were the most negatively impacted by the change academically, while high school students were nominally impacted, Thompson said.
A RAND study that surveyed families and staff at districts in Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and South Dakota found that schools that change to a four-day schedule save some money, but not much – less than 5% of their operating costs – and have similar student attendance as schools with longer weeks. Shortened school weeks have also created childcare problems for some families, especially those with lower incomes.
Time spent in school differs from state to state
Whether a district moves to a four-day schedule depends largely on whether states allow it. Thirty-one states require that schools operate at least 180 days a year, which is extremely difficult on a four-day schedule. Seven states require schools to be open 170 to 178 days a year, and two require them to be open between 160 and 165 days. Other states have a required number of hours, instead of days, that schools must offer students instruction. Three states — Idaho, Ohio and South Dakota — have no requirements.
In California, school districts that are given permission to go to a four-day school week are required to meet the same annual instructional minutes as other schools 36,000 for kindergarten, 50,400 for first through third grade, 54,000 for fourth through eighth grade and 64,800 for high school students.
Students at Leggett Unified School District attend school 152 days a year. All campuses start at 8:15 a.m. Kindergartners leave at 1 p.m., first- and second-grade students at 2:15 p.m., third- through fifth-grade students at 3 p.m, middle school students at 3:45 p.m. and high school students at 4:15 p.m.
Districts use a shorter week as a recruitment tool
School districts began to move to four-day schedules in the early 2000s as a way to save money during the Great Recession, Thompson said. Before the Covid pandemic, most districts on a four-day week were rural districts that had trouble recruiting teachers. As teacher shortages increased during the pandemic, larger districts began to consider a four-day week to recruit and retain teachers, he said.
Thompson said research hasn’t delved into whether teachers are staying in jobs because of a four-day week, but there is anecdotal evidence that teacher applications have increased in places that have made the switch.
“It is interesting where this will go,” Thompson said. “We need to get a handle on whether this is really keeping teachers in districts. If not, and we see declines in achievement, is this something we want to pursue?”
Ritchely said that the four-day school week has helped Leggett Valley Unified recruit and retain staff. The district has had virtually no turnover among its 15 teachers, with a job opening only about once every five years, he said.
“I don’t think we could attract anyone if it weren’t a four-day work week,” said Ritchely, adding that pay is lower than at most districts in the state because it is rural.
Four-day week gaining popularity in some states
Missouri has had a huge increase in the number of school districts opting for a four-day week since just last school year. The state had 119 districts on a four-year schedule last school year, compared with 146 this school year, according to Missouri State University College of Education. About a quarter of the state’s school districts have schools operating four days a week.
The increase has been so dramatic that Missouri Commissioner of Education Margie Vandeven told the state Board of Education recently that it gives her “great pause” to see how many school districts are moving to the four-day schedule, according to the Springfield News-Leader. She expressed concern that it would erode student achievement and leave students unprepared for a five-day work week when they are adults.
Despite the misgivings, the four-day week continues to grow in popularity. In Colorado, 124, or 69%, of the state’s school districts have schools on a four-day schedule, according to the Colorado Department of Education. Students at those schools attend 7.5 hours a day, 144 days a year. The state requires that schools operating fewer than 160 days a year gain permission from the commissioner of education.
Four-day weeks were so popular in Oklahoma that some districts moved to virtual instruction on the fifth day, after state lawmakers pushed back on the shortened schedule, Thompson said. Schools in other states are following their lead.
In Oregon about a third of the school districts have four-day schedules, but most are in remote parts of the state. Those districts went to four-day weeks primarily to accommodate athletic schedules, which had student-athletes, cheerleaders and band members out of school for most of the day while they traveled long distances to Friday games, Thompson said.
The idea was to recapture lost instruction time by increasing the time students were in school Monday through Thursday, he said. Most districts decided to extend the four-day week to its middle and elementary schools.
“For most of these school districts, this is more of a lifestyle change for their communities,” Thompson said.
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Steven Ene 1 month ago1 month ago
I am sure against it. What else is there than to learn.
sean kosofsky 2 months ago2 months ago
I implemented the 4-Day Workweek last year at my national nonprofit. Here’s a blog post about how we did it in case your readers want the full scoop. https://www.nonprofitfixer.com/nonprofit-fixer-blog/the-complete-guide-to-implementing-the-four-day-workweek
Todd Maddison 2 months ago2 months ago
Perhaps because "students on four-day schedules typically go to school for fewer hours and score lower on English language arts and math tests, according to research" and, believe it or not, there are some out there that think the job of our schools is educating kids. Not catering to the convenience of adults. California schools already perform about as miserably as possible, near the very bottom of the pack. Why would anyone possibly want … Read More
Perhaps because “students on four-day schedules typically go to school for fewer hours and score lower on English language arts and math tests, according to research” and, believe it or not, there are some out there that think the job of our schools is educating kids. Not catering to the convenience of adults.
California schools already perform about as miserably as possible, near the very bottom of the pack. Why would anyone possibly want to do something to make that even worse?
Gina 2 months ago2 months ago
I was surprised to see that the benefit of longer blocks of instructional time with fewer transitions wasn’t considered as an advantage. This takes into account an extra 90 minutes each day to offset the difference in hours lost (a day’s hours less recess & lunch). Schools would save money on one day less school supervisors.
Jay 2 months ago2 months ago
It’s all about the daycare component as proven during covid. Four days a week, year-round would be great for student learning and retention.
SD Parent 2 months ago2 months ago
What do working parents do on the “fifth” day, when their kids aren’t in school?
Todd Maddison 2 months ago2 months ago
If the local Starbucks chose to open later in the day and people could not get their morning latte on the way to work it would be decried as an affront against mankind. But expecting our schools to have a regular schedule for education that fits the needs of the community is “babysitting,” right?
Jennifer Peck 2 months ago2 months ago
Given the growth of expanded learning resources, California could allow one day a week to be led by partner organizations, to offer community-based, hands-on experiences for kids tied to their interests and course work. This could be field trips, internships, community service. I saw in the article an example of this happening at the high school level, but this could happen for younger kids too. Why does seat time in classrooms have to be the … Read More
Given the growth of expanded learning resources, California could allow one day a week to be led by partner organizations, to offer community-based, hands-on experiences for kids tied to their interests and course work. This could be field trips, internships, community service.
I saw in the article an example of this happening at the high school level, but this could happen for younger kids too. Why does seat time in classrooms have to be the only way to deliver content and build skills and knowledge? It doesn’t. Let’s use our communities as classrooms and draw on community assets to build an experience for kids that’s more engaging.
Tony 2 months ago2 months ago
How about we focus on teacher quality, and more time - just used smarter. What we need to address is the grip of the teachers unions on public education, poor teacher quality, staff shortages, and an overburdensome credentials process. This is where the innovations could happen, especially since the Democrats, through the teachers union, stop any progress towards innovations such as themed public schools, magnets, charter schools, or teacher career ladders that pay some teacher … Read More
How about we focus on teacher quality, and more time – just used smarter. What we need to address is the grip of the teachers unions on public education, poor teacher quality, staff shortages, and an overburdensome credentials process. This is where the innovations could happen, especially since the Democrats, through the teachers union, stop any progress towards innovations such as themed public schools, magnets, charter schools, or teacher career ladders that pay some teacher more, a concept that is outside of a collective agreement.
I am sure that teachers and principals love the 4 days a week idea! This idea is reflective of the norm now in American public schools and that is a focus more on making the educators and adults at the school happy without considering the adults and most importantly, the students.
Zeev Wurman 2 months ago2 months ago
Let’s not get too aggressive in the rush to a four-day school week. Given the average absentee rates and the quality of teaching, let’s go slowly. Perhaps just a day or two each week of quality teaching first?
I see a lot of advantages. Schools will be able to spread their maintenance over 5 days each week, teachers will be less stressed– those are the main purposes of public education these days, are they not?