The second class status of part-time faculty at California’s community colleges is a decades-long problem that demands novel solutions. With conditions worsening, state and local leaders need to find new ways to address the problem, panelists said Wednesday during an EdSource roundtable.

That could include agreeing on a master contract that sets minimum job requirements, pay and benefits; passing legislation to improve adjunct working conditions; and determining how to best utilize $200 million proposed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in the 2022-23 state budget for adjunct health care benefits.

Whatever the solution, panelists agreed that something must be done for the part-time faculty, also known as adjuncts, who make up two-thirds of the instructors at California’s 115 brick-and-mortar community colleges. The pandemic-driven loss in student enrollment is costing them jobs. Often, they work semester-by-semester with little or no job security, and those difficult conditions often trickle down and diminish the student experience, panelists said.

“As an adjunct, there’s always that feeling of, will I be needed this next semester? You’re always kind of waiting for that email or that conversation with the department chair,” said Kenneth Brown, a panelist who was recently the president of the board of California Community College trustees. An aerospace engineer, he teaches physics as an adjunct at California State University Dominguez Hills.

Nearly 37,000 adjunct instructors are the backbone of the state’s community college system, which is the nation’s largest higher-education system. Adjuncts often take gigs at multiple college districts to cobble together something akin to full-time work, but at pay rates vastly lower than full-time professors.

Since the onset of the pandemic in spring 2020, enrollment has plummeted at the community colleges, resulting in fewer jobs for adjuncts. Enrollment declined significantly during the 2020-21 academic year: The community college system reported its enrollment at 1.8 million, down about 15% from before the pandemic. Many colleges have continued to lose students over the most recent 2021-22 academic year.

Even though problems facing adjuncts have been exacerbated during the pandemic, the issue is not a new one. Community colleges have long relied on part-time faculty to balance their budgets and give them the flexibility to hire faculty as needed. Whether they get health benefits depends on which district employs them.  As EdSource revealed in a three-part series in February,  33 of the 72 community college districts offer no health benefits.

Adjuncts grossed an average of less than $20,000 per district, according to 2020 salary data for 41 of the 72 districts that listed titles for part-time faculty. The data was obtained by EdSource under the state’s Public Records Act.

Often, it is students who pay the price for the poor working conditions of part-time faculty, panelists said. For example, there is wide variation across California’s community colleges when it comes to compensation for office hours, which are often as crucial to student success as regular classroom instruction. Some adjuncts don’t get paid at all for office hours, and some refuse to put in that time for no pay. Full-time faculty typically are compensated for office hours and any work outside the classroom.

John Martin, a panelist and an adjunct faculty member at Shasta and Butte colleges, said he no longer meets with students outside the classroom because he doesn’t get paid for those hours.

“Why should I work for free? I meet with them right after class, right before class, but I’m not going to hold office hours unless they are paid,” said Martin, who is also chair of the California Part-Time Faculty Association, an advocacy group for adjuncts.

Another panelist, Wendy Brill-Wynkoop, president of the Faculty Association of California Community Colleges, pointed out that adjunct “working conditions are our student learning conditions” yet students attending California’s community colleges are often among the lowest-income students.

Part-time faculty are asked to help lift those students out of poverty and into the workforce, even though the faculty themselves aren’t fairly compensated, creating a difficult situation for both students and faculty, Brill-Wynkoop said.

“You’re asking those who are unfairly compensated to lift others out of poverty,” she said.

At the same time, part-time faculty have essentially been pitted against full-time faculty, said Jose Fierro, president of Cerritos College and a roundtable panelist.

“Years of policy have led to disparity, and this disparity often puts two groups in competition,” he said. “So in a state like California … oftentimes you have contracts that give priority of assignment to full-time faculty.”

The solution lies beyond individual campuses, he added. “The way to talk about working conditions and employment for part-time faculty is to look at the larger system issues rather than what we find in 115 different colleges, because there are 115 different ways in which that will be addressed. And we’ll see that that’s not working.”

Another panelist, William Herbert, executive director of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions at Hunter College in New York City, said there are several routes California can take to improve the realities of part-time faculty.

One option, according to Herbert, would be to establish minimum standards at a statewide level that would set a baseline for issues like compensation and benefits for adjuncts.

Another option would be to create better conditions through collective bargaining and even come up with a master contract that could be applied to campuses across the state.

“It could create a better playing field for everyone,” Herbert said. “A part of those negotiations could be creating a pathway towards full-time employment.”

Adjuncts told EdSource that they don’t feel that they get a fair shot at full-time jobs given their teaching experience.

Martin said his organization, which does not negotiate adjunct contracts, is finally getting attention from the state’s unions. “They are listening to us. However, there are a group of people in power that are dragging their heels, and they are in strong opposition to amend our working conditions.”

There have been several proposals this year at the statewide level that could improve the circumstances of adjunct faculty. On Thursday, one bill affecting adjunct faculty cleared a key committee while another was shelved.

Assembly Bill 1856 would allow adjuncts to teach up to 85% of a full-time teaching load in a single district, something that would provide them more stability and lessen their need to cobble together jobs across multiple districts. The bill was passed Thursday by the Assembly’s Appropriations Committee. However, Newsom vetoed similar legislation last year. 

Assembly Bill 1752, meanwhile, died Thursday in the same committee. It proposed to bring pay equity between part-time and full-time faculty by requiring districts to pay their part-timers the same average hourly wage as the average hourly pay for full-time faculty.

At the same time, Newsom’s budget proposal includes $200 million to fund health care coverage for adjuncts at colleges across the state. The money would fund a pool to which local districts would have to apply for reimbursement for 50% of their cost of providing coverage. The fund has been badly underfunded in recent years. The terms would have to be negotiated at every campus. Still, the proposal is seen as an investment that would vastly increase what is currently available.

Fierro, the president of Cerritos College, suggested during the roundtable that the money for health care could be allocated at a statewide level, rather than at local colleges.

“This should be an opportunity for us to look at how we can enroll part-time faculty into a statewide system of benefits, utilizing the purchasing power that is in this year’s budget and that has already been given to the districts and maybe saying, we’re going to take back all that and this is going to be a big umbrella through the state in which we can affiliate community college employees that meet these specific characteristics,” he said.

“The power that we will have in numbers, not just in numbers of faculty, but the amount of money that collectively is spent, I think could provide something a little better than what we individually could,” Fierro added.

During the roundtable, panelists also addressed the racial makeup of faculty at the community colleges, which does not reflect the diversity of the students attending those colleges. Nearly 60% of faculty across the state are white, while 71% of students are from other racial and ethnic backgrounds, including students who are Latino, Black, Asian and Native American.

Brill-Wynkoop said it’s an “enormous problem” that is compounded by the poor working conditions for part-timers.

“So we’ve created a circumstance where we need to bring in new, fresh ideas, younger, diverse faculty, and it is very difficult when we’ve created a system where the chances of getting a full-time position and being able to sustain yourself are very small,” she said.

Fierro added, though, that it will require more than just higher pay and better working conditions to ensure that the faculty match the diversity of the students. One possible solution, he said, is making sure job hiring panels include diverse members.

“Panels tend to hire what they reflect,” he said. “And if we do not diversify panels, we will continue to hire in the same way we have been doing.”

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Comments (5)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Donna Frankel 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    After 34 years teaching at multiple community colleges in CA for 20 years at two very different districts simultaneously, I know firsthand each point made above, as do many part-time faculty. I have spent many years as PT rep on two unions and as a PT rep on 3 academic senates and most recently serving on the Noncredit ASCCC committee where we put on a major 3 day institute last month, and now as an … Read More

    After 34 years teaching at multiple community colleges in CA for 20 years at two very different districts simultaneously, I know firsthand each point made above, as do many part-time faculty. I have spent many years as PT rep on two unions and as a PT rep on 3 academic senates and most recently serving on the Noncredit ASCCC committee where we put on a major 3 day institute last month, and now as an elected FACCC PT Northern CA Governor.

    I am convinced that the points made need to be solved at the state level; however as hard as we all work, a major challenge is the Suspense File. Far too many bills that could help PTF are quietly killed there, politicians never having to explain why. Any ideas on getting each bill stuck or killed in the Suspense File made public with those in charge pressured to explain their reasoning why and to come up with bills that can make it through?

  2. Michael J Dixon 1 month ago1 month ago

    I would go further and say if you have years of good evaluations, you should have the right of first refusal when full-time positions open instead of the college doing a national search and if they deign to give you an interview, pretending like they don’t know you.

    That would not only show that schools value their adjunct instructors but likely save a lot of time and money as well.

    Replies

    • Terry Givens 1 month ago1 month ago

      I agree that the department/college should offer a full/time or tenured position to long term adjuncts but as long as I have been at my college they always hire from outside. It’s demoralizing but we are just happy to have what we have which in reality isn’t much.

  3. Michael J Dixon 1 month ago1 month ago

    Something that all faculty should be concerned about is foundations and astroturf groups of the wealthy having far more control over curriculum and learning conditions for students than instructors and mid-level admins who might actually care about them. In particular, here in California, a lot of students struggle to finish their transfer or vocational program. But instead of seeing the problem as not enough financial aid to cover living expenses and a minimum wage so low … Read More

    Something that all faculty should be concerned about is foundations and astroturf groups of the wealthy having far more control over curriculum and learning conditions for students than instructors and mid-level admins who might actually care about them.

    In particular, here in California, a lot of students struggle to finish their transfer or vocational program. But instead of seeing the problem as not enough financial aid to cover living expenses and a minimum wage so low they have to work absurd hours to keep a roof over their heads (or just live in their cars), an astroturf group claims the problem is too many remedial classes to make up for skill deficits, so standards should be lowered, which happened with AB 705.

    That was one of the most demoralizing things in my whole teaching career, even more than not getting a full-time tenure track job.

    Legislators cannot claim to be progressive or care about students if they vandalize education whenever the wealthy snap their fingers.

  4. Terry Givens 1 month ago1 month ago

    Great job of covering the zoom meeting. I don’t think they came to any consensus as there are so many issues; which issue is most important? I don’t think there is enough attention to the connection between student success and enrollment (yep making that connection) and enabling adjuncts to achieve some kind of wage parity, etc. I think we do most of our work at home, which is not compensated, and most of us don't … Read More

    Great job of covering the zoom meeting. I don’t think they came to any consensus as there are so many issues; which issue is most important? I don’t think there is enough attention to the connection between student success and enrollment (yep making that connection) and enabling adjuncts to achieve some kind of wage parity, etc.

    I think we do most of our work at home, which is not compensated, and most of us don’t have an office to meet with students (I hold weekly zoom meetings from home helping students unless it’s a smaller issue before or after class; I get paid a minimum for this extra time with students).

    Maybe allow adjuncts to teach more classes to help with wage parity. Assuming the adjunct isn’t running off to another part time job at another campus, the adjunct becomes more committed to the student, the department, and the campus. If there is a possible benefit to the student, it should be tried.

    I am very disappointed that AB 1752 is dead in the Assembly. Due to that the fact adjuncts make up 70% of the teaching staff in the CCC system, I believe enrollment will continue to drop until wage parity is achieved for adjuncts.