The sponsor of legislation that would have provided $400 million in additional funding to raise the academic achievement of Black students pulled the proposal hours before likely passage Wednesday, after Gov. Gavin Newsom raised objections.
Newsom advisers did not say what those objections were, although four years ago, in a similar bill, Assembly legislative analysts suggested that the legislation would violate Proposition 209, a 1996 constitutional amendment. It bars preferential treatment by state and local governments in areas of public employment, education, and contracting based on sex, race and ethnicity. Two years ago, California voters reaffirmed Prop. 209 by voting down an initiative to rescind it.
Both the 2018 legislation and Assembly Bill 2774, sponsored by Assemblywoman Akilah Weber, D-San Diego, would have added funding for the first time for students in the lowest performing student group, which for decades has been Black students. Because the bill focused on student performance, not race, Weber and proponents said the bill would not violate Prop. 209. The bill moved through the Legislature with nearly unanimous approval, without a mention of Prop. 209. Faced with similar opposition from then-Gov. Jerry Brown, the 2018 bill, although popular, also stalled before reaching Brown’s desk.
Weber said she withdrew the bill after lengthy negotiations with the Newsom staffers. Both she and the Newsom administration were upbeat but circumspect in statements in which they agreed to work together on a commonly held goal.
Weber wrote she was “happy to announce” that Newsom “committed to ongoing funding and to work with us to create a comprehensive policy” to improve performance “of students in the lowest-performing groups and the related goal of addressing the needs of Black students.”
A statement from Newsom’s office said the administration is committed to working with Weber, the California Legislative Black Caucus and others “to develop a comprehensive proposal” in the 2023 state budget that would “focus increased resources and services on the needs of our lowest performing students.” Neither Newsom not Weber acknowledged that Prop. 209 was an issue.
Supporters of the bill were reported to be angry with the terms of a three-page agreement that Weber and the administration reached, and some would have preferred to send Newsom the bill to sign or veto. The document has not been released.
In a statement released Friday, a coalition of civil rights and education leaders expressed disappointment that the bill did not move forward. Alluding to Prop. 209, the bill’s co-sponsor, Margaret Fortune, president and CEO of Fortune School, a group of 10 charter schools concentrated in the Sacramento area, serving primarily Black students, said, “This result leads us to ask why is the state being selective in the application of ‘constitutional issues’ to single out and prohibit support for Black students — the state’s lowest performing subgroup — in ways in which California routinely helps other high needs subgroups of students.”
Debra Watkins a former English teacher co-founder of Black Students of California United and founder of A Black Education Network, added, “After 45 years in the field of education watching Black students remain at the bottom of the academic achievement ladder, I am just frustrated.”
The bill would have completed a five-year campaign initiated by Weber’s mother, Shirley Weber, who held Akilah Weber’s Assembly seat before Newsom appointed her secretary of state. Similar versions of the first bill also failed to become law despite substantial support.
“We have been failing Black kids for years,” said Akilah Weber said earlier this year. “No one should bring that to the state, it should be something that the state has recognized and wants to fix on its own because you want the best for the kids.”
In 2018-19, the last year before the pandemic, only 33% of Black students met or exceeded English language arts standards, and only 21% met or exceeded math standards on the state tests, compared with 51% in English language arts and 40% in math for all students in California. Proportionally, twice as many white students passed the tests, and the gap was widest with Asian students; 79% of Asians met or exceeded standards in English language arts and 77% did so in math. In math, low-income white students outperformed non-low-income Black students.
“The data show that long-standing academic underperformance and systemic neglect have been chronic and not addressed,” said Fortune. Along with the Fortune School, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond also co-sponsored the bill.
The bill would have amended the Local Control Funding Formula to add a new category of students qualifying for extra funding: the lowest performing student group not already covered by the law. Doing so would distribute an estimated $400 million to 785 districts, starting in 2023-24, based on Black student enrollment.
The formula currently provides supplemental funding for English learners and low-income, foster and homeless children with additional “concentration” funding where those students are disproportionally enrolled. But each qualifying student receives money for only one category; students who are English learners and low-income don’t receive double funding.
Black students constitute 5.6% of the state’s 5.9 million students. Since an estimated 70% of Black students are low-income, the $400 million would cover the 80,000 of 285,000 Black students enrolled in 2021-22 who are not low-income, foster or homeless students.
Fortune said that issues of race and poverty are often conflated. “Something in the achievement gap is not just about poverty,” she said. “Something more is at play.”
About a quarter of the 80,000 students are enrolled in 10 districts, led by Los Angeles Unified, which would have received more than $45 million for nearly 6,000 students; Long Beach Unified, whose 2,600 students would have drawn $20 million; and West Contra Costa Unified, whose 2,054 students would have gotten $16 million, based on the 2021-22 funding levels, according to a database on a website that the sponsors created.
Additional funding would have started next year. Under the bill, school districts would have had to include a three-year funding plan for increased or improved programs or services for meeting the needs of Black students in their Local Control and Accountability Plans, as they have done with English learners and other student groups receiving supplemental and concentration funding. By law, they have to involve the public in creating the plan.
The money could fund tutoring and other academic programs or staff focused on Black achievement. In 2017, Fresno Unified took the initiative on its own when it established the Office of African American Academic Acceleration, known as A4 and budgeted $9 million to identify and address the causes of the discrepancy in academic outcomes between African American students, who make up 8% of all students, and other student groups.
Fresno Unified Superintendent Bob Nelson said last month that passage of the bill would provide “a sustainable source of funding and eliminate the narrative that you have no money to spend on these students,” he said. “If you can crack that nut, you can apply lessons to other disproportionate groups.”
Fresno Unified also announced the launch of the state’s first dual-enrollment alliance with one of the nation’s historically Black colleges and universities.
HBCU Step-Up Pathways Program will offer up to 100 students in three of Fresno’s nine high schools free enrollment in online courses at Benedict College, a small liberal arts college in South Carolina. The students will be coached in the courses on days when they’re not online. The courses will be transferable to California community colleges, and the district is arranging a credit transfer contract with Fresno State, Fresno Superintendent Bob Nelson said.
Nelson said the district is in preliminary discussions with St. Augustine’s University in Raleigh, North Carolina, about opening a brick-and-mortar campus in Fresno. It would be the first HBCU to open west of Texas, he said.
Fortune said that 89% of Fortune Early College High School students graduate with some college credit, and more than a quarter of the school’s graduates earn one or two associate’s degrees, compared with 1% of Black California high school grads statewide.
Students at the Fortune charter schools, where students take Saturday school and summer programs, graduate from high school with an associate’s degree.
After squelching the first version of the bill in 2018, Gov. Jerry Brown agreed to include $300 million in one-time funding over three years for all low-performing students not covered by supplemental funding under the funding formula, but not exclusively for the lowest-performing student group. An analysis found that only 8% of that funding was allocated to Black students.
Covid interfered with districts’ ability to implement new programs and document them for a report back to the Legislature. Fortune said that it was no replacement for ongoing funding, which would enable long-term investments, including staff positions. That was the advantage, she said, of AB 2774.
Under the bill, the California Department of Education would have designated the lowest performing group annually, based on Smarter Balanced scores. If Black students outperformed the second lowest performing student group, currently Native Americans, those students would then receive supplemental and concentration funding. However, Black students would continue to receive additional funding until that group equaled or exceeded the performance of the highest scoring group, Asian students.
Narrowing the gap, with added funding and evidence-based programs, should be achievable, but eliminating a performance gap of 40 percentage points in English language arts and nearly 60 percentage points in math would be a daunting long-term challenge.
Students with disabilities, whose scores are below those of Black students, were excluded from the bill because they receive state funding outside the Local Control Funding Formula.
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Rene T 9 months ago9 months ago
If people were cognizant of the unusual degree of racism that Black students have to contend with, a bill like this would have no problem getting passed. But then, if people were cognizant of the unusual degree of racism that Black students have to contend with, a bill like this probably wouldn’t be necessary. So it’s kind of a Catch 22.
Michael Batie PhD 9 months ago9 months ago
Money is NOT the issue for Black students’ achievement. This website http://www.michaelbatie.com/settlement/ presents an analysis of the results when $150M was allocated to Low Performing students in the LAUSD settlement that resulted from the lawsuit brought forward by the Community Coalition and the ACLU. The results were abysmal at best.
Alfred Gbada 9 months ago9 months ago
Well, how is it the Native Americans can get tuition free college ?
LogicalParent 9 months ago9 months ago
Since CA prop 16 didn’t pass, I understand why our governor wisely choose not to play favorites when it comes to races.Just allocating money into a non clearly defined problem won’t fix it.
Mary Coleman 9 months ago9 months ago
It’s funny that he would block money for African-Americans, but have no problem giving money and other help to those who come over here illegally. But there’s a problem when it comes to helping the citizens of California! I’m sure the constitution don’t tell him to do that!!!
Samara L Miller 9 months ago9 months ago
Governor Newsome has my vote. At first I didn’t think he was going to be a good Governor. My hat goes off to him . I have been watching him since he has been in office. He has handled California with class and dignity. Thank you First Lady Newsome for sharing your husband with California. We all know it’s the strong women who stand by the great men in this country we live so much. Keep up the Awesome work
el 9 months ago9 months ago
"Covid interfered with districts’ ability to implement new programs and document them for a report back to the Legislature." When the Local Control Funding Formula was implemented, the intent was to get rid of all the small categorical programs with extensive paperwork and instead give money in larger blocks and give the schools the leeway to spend it as they thought best knowing their local population of students. There is then general oversight from the community … Read More
When the Local Control Funding Formula was implemented, the intent was to get rid of all the small categorical programs with extensive paperwork and instead give money in larger blocks and give the schools the leeway to spend it as they thought best knowing their local population of students. There is then general oversight from the community and the county office of education.
These categoricals, as well-intended as they are, are creeping back in, and creating all kinds of overhead that is taking away local control and forcing a lot of district time for reports that, let’s face it, will never be read, and even if they are occasionally read, will probably not be consumed as actionable, useful feedback to improve programs.
I cannot overstate how much these reports take away attention from actually doing what is right for kids. If the legislature wants them, they can fund researchers to learn what is and isn’t working in schools.
Creating model programs, access to experts, and resources to implement programs is something most educators are excited about and willing to follow. No one in education wants to see a particular group of students falling behind. And, most likely, if you disaggregate that data to the school or district level, you’ll find different groups are the ones that most need help in particular schools. (Asians are a grouping that can be especially misleading, in that the success of established families from China or India in Silicon Valley don’t necessarily correlate to success for Hmong in the Central Valley, for example.)