Credit: Courtesy of SARAH COURTNEY
A student at Lucerne Valley Elementary aims to sink a ping pong ball into a glass jar at the school's end-of-the-year carnival.
Note: California has delayed its Covid vaccine mandate for schools until at least July 2023. Read more.

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s school vaccine mandate is at least five months away, but some school boards, particularly those in small, rural, mostly conservative areas of California, are already saying they won’t enforce it.

The vaccine mandate, meant to slow the spread of Covid-19, will prohibit unvaccinated staff and students from coming onto school campuses for in-person instruction, although students can enroll in independent study. The executive order is expected to go into effect July 1.

Since the announcement in October, school boards for districts like Mark Twain Union Elementary School District in Calaveras County and Oakdale Joint Unified in Stanislaus County have passed resolutions saying they will defy the state mandate. The school board of the Happy Valley Union School District in Shasta County did not pass a formal resolution, but voted 4-0 on Oct. 12 “to refuse to comply with non-voluntary Covid-19 vaccine mandates now or in the future,” according to board minutes.

Officials from other districts, like Lucerne Valley Unified and Hesperia Unified in San Bernardino County and Calaveras Unified in Calaveras County, also have indicated they may allow unvaccinated students to come to school for in-person instruction after the mandate takes effect.

Soulsbyville Elementary School District in Tuolumne County initially passed a resolution stating that it would not enforce the vaccine mandate, but the board rescinded it after its insurance provider, the Tuolumne Joint Powers Authority, informed the district it would not cover any future claims related to Covid-19, according to the Union Democrat. The resolution also would have made masking optional.

School boards that defy state mandates are putting their state funding and liability insurance in peril, and trustees could face fines or jail time for ignoring the law, according to lawyers and insurance providers.

How the state will enforce the vaccine mandate remains to be seen. The role of the California Department of Education could be limited to reducing funding if external audits show a district didn’t meet state immunization requirements. The California Attorney General’s Office or a local district attorney’s office could prosecute individuals if they ignore the law, said Leslie Jacobs, a University of the Pacific law professor.

The California Department of Education is “taking this matter seriously,” but hasn’t sent any letters to districts that intend to defy the mandate, department spokesman Scott Roark said via email.

School boards resolve not to follow vaccine mandate

School board resolutions against the vaccine invoke similar arguments. Most say that parents should decide whether their children are immunized, districts should be able to make decisions like this based on local conditions and that the mandate discriminates against people of color because they have lower rates of vaccination, among other things.

Lucerne Valley Unified’s school board was one of the first to pass a resolution proclaiming its opposition to the mandate, although it stopped short of refusing to adhere to it. The resolution states that the mandate would infringe on parental rights and the rights of students to a free public education, that children are at lower risk of dying or getting seriously ill from Covid-19, and that people have the right to deny unwanted medical treatment, among other things.

Since March 2020, when schools were closed in response to the pandemic, the deaths of 51 California children 17 and younger have been associated with Covid-19, according to the California Department of Public Health.

The Lucerne Valley Unified six-page resolution also questions the district’s legal authority to mandate vaccinations because the Covid-19 vaccination is not included in the list of 10 vaccinations already required for children to attend school in California. That could change soon. Sen. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento, announced recently that a newly introduced bill would add the Covid-19 vaccine to the list, eliminating the personal belief exemption and adding oversight to those who issue medical exemptions for it.

Superintendent Peter Livingston said the district will follow the state vaccine mandate, but followed that statement by saying that he would allow unvaccinated students to come back to school if a large number of students don’t get vaccinated.

“If the mandate is implemented in 2022-23, half of our students won’t comply with it,” Livingston said. “I can’t let them sit at home and do nothing.”

Hesperia Unified Superintendent David Olney said the district’s school board passed a resolution opposing the state vaccine mandate and supporting personal belief exemptions, but district officials haven’t decided whether they will enforce the vaccine mandate when it begins.

“We will cross that bridge when we come to it,” he said Tuesday.

Mark Twain Union Elementary school board President Jenny Eltringham also said she expects half of the district’s students will leave school if the mandate is enforced. She is more concerned about parents “yanking their kids out of school” than about losing state funding or being fined.

“You can’t run a school with no kids,” Eltringham said. “Parental choice, that’s what I’m for.”

Although parents have threatened to pull their children from public schools if the vaccine mandate isn’t rescinded, it’s not clear where they would attend school. Charter and private schools offering on-site instruction are also subject to the vaccine mandate. Virtual schools could be an option, but spots are limited because the state has put a temporary moratorium on opening new virtual charter schools. The only other option for parents would be to home-school their children by filing a private-school affidavit with the state.

Eltringham also wasn’t concerned about the increased risk of Covid spread if the district doesn’t enforce the mandate because the district has already seen Covid spread due to school sports.

“We’ve had quite a few cases, but the children come out of it, you know,” she said.

Ignoring state mandate could be costly for districts

School districts that eschew state mandates could have more to worry about than state funding. Most California school districts’ insurance policies do not cover lawsuits or other losses if someone contracts a communicable disease. Districts with insurance policies that do cover that could still be at risk of losing coverage for infections and lawsuits related to Covid-19 if they ignore state mandates and allow students and teachers to go to class without being vaccinated or wearing masks.

“Generally speaking, if you intentionally break the law you can’t count on insurance to cover the consequences,” said Cindy Wilkerson, executive director of Schools Insurance Group, a joint-powers authority that insures 30 school districts in Northern California. “We aren’t unique in this. The coverage exclusion is probably in every coverage document or insurance policy.”

Almost all school districts in California are part of a joint powers authority that allows a group of districts to pool their risk and insure themselves. Each board is made up of representatives from member school districts. Many of these groups have sent letters to districts warning that snubbing state mandates, including those requiring masking and vaccines, could leave those districts without coverage if someone gets ill and files a lawsuit.

In a letter to members last year, Wilkerson advised school officials that if they don’t follow state, federal or local mandates, districts would likely have to pay their own attorney fees and any possible judgments that occur as a result of a lawsuit.

Wilkerson recommends that districts collaborate with their legal counsel and local public health officials to decide how they can remain in compliance with California Department of Public Health guidance. She hasn’t been informed that any of the districts covered by the Schools Insurance Group intend to ignore the vaccine mandate.

Last year, Assemblymember Patrick O’Donnell, D-Long Beach, attempted to pass legislation that would have exempted school districts and their employees from liability and damages due to Covid-19 infection as long as districts established health and safety policies and procedures consistent with federal, state and local requirements. The bill did not pass.

The decision to ignore the state mandate also could affect a district’s workers compensation coverage if members of the staff contract the disease at work. Districts could also lose coverage for Covid-related actions like discrimination, wrongful termination and failure to educate, said Doug Ross, vice president of Keenan & Associates, which manages the Regional Liability Excess Fund and other joint powers authorities that provide insurance to school districts.

“I think if school district leadership blatantly disregards state and local guidelines and directs their employees to do the same, it definitely could compromise what coverage they would otherwise have available,” Ross said. “However, if an employee simply forgets to do something, or is unclear on what the requirement was, and an otherwise covered loss occurs, insurance would still cover it.”

The Regional Liability Excess Fund serves 442 California school districts. It also is recommending that its members follow state mandates. Ross said he hasn’t been informed that any of the districts covered by his organization intend to disregard the state vaccine mandate.

Kristina Funderburk, senior associate counsel for Schools Legal Service, a joint powers authority that provides legal services to school districts, sent a letter to the Tuolumne Joint Powers Authority warning its members that defying the state vaccine mandate could bring serious consequences. The Tuolumne Joint Powers Authority insures 21 rural school districts in Alpine, Amador, Calaveras and Tuolumne counties.

School board members could open themselves up to lawsuits, be charged with a misdemeanor and be fined up to $1,000 each or receive jail terms of up to six months, or both, if they willfully fail to follow the state’s public health order, Funderburk said in the letter. She also warned that school districts could lose both state and federal funding if officials fail to comply with the governor’s order or any new legislation that adds the Covid-19 vaccine to the list of required immunizations.

An analysis of the potential liability Calaveras Unified could face if it failed to follow the state mandate was spelled out similarly by Lozano Smith, a Sacramento law firm. Along with opening itself up to lawsuits, it said the district could face fines and penalties issued by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health or public health officials. Better known as Cal/OSHA, the division is the state agency that sets and enforces workforce safety standards.

“The most damaging thing a school district can do is to go on record at a public school board meeting or elsewhere explicitly stating that the district will not follow or enforce the law,” states the analysis. “Schools that do not follow executive orders, public health orders and public health guidance are likely to be targets of litigation. Given that most or all school districts do not have insurance coverage for infectious diseases, the potential liability is very high.”

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (13)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Shirley D Davies 3 months ago3 months ago

    It should be up to parents, they are the responsible ones for their children. Children do not belong to the state. This makes school choice a necessity for all who favor freedom of choice for famiies.

    No Dictatorial state in California.

  2. LMS 3 months ago3 months ago

    Newsom’s mandated Covid injections for school staff and students is illogical. As new data has emerged that clearly indicates these injections do not stop transmission nor protect against infection. Additionally, factor in the overwhelming data reporting serious side effects, lack of long term data and ongoing required boosters, makes Newsom’s mandate
    totally incomprehensible.

  3. Mel Marley 3 months ago3 months ago

    I don’t understand all the worry about being sued. Has no one ever signed a waiver where they give up their right to sue?? Just have everyone sign that release of liability waiver about covid-19 when they enter the schoolhouse. Simple.

  4. Ann 4 months ago4 months ago

    I predict this mandate will crash and burn as we are finding out more about the real side effects.

  5. Nicole Amaral 4 months ago4 months ago

    Is there an update on this since the new study shows that the Covid shots are only 12% effective for kids 5-11 after 55 days? My son got Covid in December, almost everyone in his school got it December-February. Even the kids who were fully vaccinated. All of the symptoms were the same, zero to very mild. What is the case to mandate this vaccine if the result is the same whether or not … Read More

    Is there an update on this since the new study shows that the Covid shots are only 12% effective for kids 5-11 after 55 days? My son got Covid in December, almost everyone in his school got it December-February. Even the kids who were fully vaccinated. All of the symptoms were the same, zero to very mild. What is the case to mandate this vaccine if the result is the same whether or not they get vaccinated? We aren’t injecting my 9 year old with a drug that can do more harm than good. No way!

  6. Franklin Murakami 4 months ago4 months ago

    Homeschooling isn’t as scary as it sounds. There are excellent resources and support groups all over California. There are also really good online options that have nothing to do with charter schools. You need to pay for them yourself but it isn’t super expensive. Guidepost Montessori offers both a homeschool and an online option, both of which are free of all vaccine rules.

  7. Nicole Amaral 4 months ago4 months ago

    I think only 1/4 of kids 5-11 have received the Covid shots. My guess is not many more will get it by January. Ted Cruz may get this amendment passed that withholds federal funding to schools that enforce mandates. Either way, I highly doubt this will be enforced or that the personal belief exemption will be taken away. My son is 9 and has had Covid. It was less than an allergy for three days. … Read More

    I think only 1/4 of kids 5-11 have received the Covid shots. My guess is not many more will get it by January. Ted Cruz may get this amendment passed that withholds federal funding to schools that enforce mandates. Either way, I highly doubt this will be enforced or that the personal belief exemption will be taken away. My son is 9 and has had Covid. It was less than an allergy for three days. We are not going to give him the Covid shots. He is at a Catholic School. We plan on standing our ground and requesting a personal beliefs exemption if need be. Let’s just go on with our lives and leave the kids alone!

  8. Arie Spangler 5 months ago5 months ago

    This article has some major factual errors. There is no “Executive Order” that requires students to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Newsom announced that he would direct CDPH to add COVID-19 to the list of the (currently 10) required vaccines, but as specified in the statute, any vaccine requirement that is added by CDPH will be subject to a Personal Belief Exemption that schools are required to honor.

  9. William 5 months ago5 months ago

    Quoted from the article: "School board resolutions against the vaccine invoke similar arguments. Most say that parents should decide whether their children are immunized" definition of immunized - to make (someone or something) immune to something. The Covid injections do not give immunization. Period! Whether it is Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, all the clinical trials done on these injections have stated they do not prevent transmission or infection. Stop spouting out misleading medical misinformation EdSource. Or are … Read More

    Quoted from the article:

    “School board resolutions against the vaccine invoke similar arguments. Most say that parents should decide whether their children are immunized”

    definition of immunized – to make (someone or something) immune to something.

    The Covid injections do not give immunization. Period! Whether it is Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, all the clinical trials done on these injections have stated they do not prevent transmission or infection.

    Stop spouting out misleading medical misinformation EdSource. Or are you also all paid off by big pharma?

  10. JudiAU 5 months ago5 months ago

    This vaccine is no different than others. I look forward to our district enforcing this policy and requiring it for 5-12. Vaccines are the way to end this pandemic.

  11. tomm 5 months ago5 months ago

    Experimental or not, millions of kids have already gotten Covid and recovered, without major sickness. Given that, why would their prior immunity not be considered? This forced vaccination from our Emperor just goes too far. It sounds like teacher union influence, again. Just listen to what Randi Weingarten said this week about this subject.

  12. Charles Wilkers 5 months ago5 months ago

    No one can be forced to take the vaccines that are currently available in the US. The only ones available (Biontech and Moderna) are under Emergency Use Authorization only. Suspiciously, the two that were FDA approved (Comirnaty and Spikeovac) are "unavailable" in the US. The demons in this administration want you to believe that "they're the same" and you have no choice. The two FDA approved vaccines are unavailable, because citizens can sue manufactures for … Read More

    No one can be forced to take the vaccines that are currently available in the US. The only ones available (Biontech and Moderna) are under Emergency Use Authorization only. Suspiciously, the two that were FDA approved (Comirnaty and Spikeovac) are “unavailable” in the US. The demons in this administration want you to believe that “they’re the same” and you have no choice. The two FDA approved vaccines are unavailable, because citizens can sue manufactures for injuries when they are FDA approved, whereas, if you are duped into taking the only ones available under EUA, you can’t sue for damages.

    Replies

    • John Fensterwald 5 months ago5 months ago

      Mr, Wilkers,

      The FDA and CDC have granted full approval for Moderna for adults, as of last week, and previously granted full approval for Pfizer for those 16 and older. You can read about it here and here.