Chico State’s Academic Senate voted 34-1 Wednesday to ask California State University trustees to conduct an independent investigation of their campus leadership’s handling of suspended professor David Stachura’s sexual affair with a student and alleged threats to shoot colleagues.
A Senate committee also voted to ask campus President Gayle Hutchinson to revoke Stachura’s “Outstanding Professor” award for the 2020-2021 academic year. Hutchinson quickly did so late Wednesday, her spokesperson said.
The decision to ask for an investigation left the Senate scrambling to schedule a second vote for Friday to make the resolution final before winter break. Senate members said they wanted to give students an immediate and clear message that action was being taken and to hear their input before a second vote.
“Students are very concerned about the state of things,” said music and theater professor Mathew Teague Miller, a Senate member. “They want to see something immediately.”
The meeting followed Hutchinson’s Tuesday apology to the campus and was the second emotionally fraught public session on the Stachura case in three days, following a campuswide online gathering Monday in which students expressed fear and outrage. Wednesday’s Senate meeting, limited to 300 attendees on Zoom, was no less emotional.
Speaking to senators Wednesday, one student broke into sobs when she said her sister, a University of Arizona student, was nearby when a professor there was shot dead in October.
“I do not want to come home if a school shooting were to happen, to tell my parents — who have four daughters — that two of their daughters experienced a school shooting. I am terrified,” said Krystal Alvarez, president of the Associated Students of CSU Chico.
Some senators had advocated on social media Tuesday to use the meeting to take a no-confidence vote on Hutchinson and Provost Debra Larson. But although it was discussed, there appeared to be waning support for such measures. Instead, senators said the way Stachura and the alleged threats were dealt with needed outside review. A biology department lecturer told the campus meeting Monday that Stachura had talked to her about getting a weapon and going on a campus shooting spree, quoting him as saying, “If I wanted you guys dead, you’d be dead. I’m a doer.” Last year, in seeking a restraining order in an ongoing divorce and child custody case, Stachura’s estranged wife, Miranda King, told a Butte County judge in writing that Stachura told her he wanted to kill the complaining professors and had bought hollow-point bullets to, in his words,“ do maximum damage.
“The word ‘independent’ is made very specific here,” said Jeff Trailer, a professor of management in the College of Business. “We need this done by someone with no ties to campus.”
A spokesperson for the CSU system declined to comment on the request because it was not yet final.
A university investigator found in 2020 that Stachura, 44, had a consensual sexual affair with a graduate student whom he supervised, a violation of the university sexual harassment policy meant to stop academics from coercing students into intimate relationships. Two female professors who say they heard Stachura having sex with the student in his office, found them in his office with a futon open into a bed and the room reeking of sex, cooperated with the investigation. One of the professors said she saw Stachura and the student kissing in a lab. Stachura denied the affair, a claim he continued recently in an interview with EdSource.
The university settled the matter with Stachura on Dec. 1, 2020. He was suspended without pay for a third of the semester. He withdrew an application for promotion to full professor with tenure. The university agreed to not place the investigation in his personnel file, allowing him to reapply for the promotion, which was later approved.
On the date the CSU Chancellor’s Office rejected his appeal in the sex case, Oct. 15, 2020, EdSource reported last week, he bought two boxes of hollow-point bullets and more than 50 rounds of 12-gauge buckshot shotgun shells. In an interview withEd Source, he twice said he couldn’t remember the purchases, then said the date was a coincidence.
The lecturer’s story this week on Zoom further riled the campus, increasing criticism of the administration for not revealing the earlier threats. Hutchinson said multiple times that limits on what she could reveal about personnel matters kept the threats from being disclosed even as Stachura was returned to work and monitored.
“But the first of the alleged threats, reported to the university in August 2021, could have been publicly revealed even though he was not disciplined for them, said David Loy, the legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, an open-government advocacy group. The importance of disclosure of something so important to campus safety trumped any right to confidentiality, Loy said.
Stachura was investigated for the threats against the professors and interviewed twice by a retired FBI agent the university hired. The former agent made no recommendation about whether Chico State officials, who had also interviewed Stachura, should fire him. Loy said the circumstances add up to a strong basis for the university to have disclosed the threats.
“There is clearly nothing more substantial than a threat to shoot” people on a college campus, Loy said Wednesday, citing state court decisions where allegations of misconduct were disclosed in the public interest. In a case involving the Bakersfield City School District, an appeals court ruled that disciplinary records of allegations of a teacher’s sexual misconduct and violent threats could be released when there is “reasonable cause to believe the complaint is well-founded, public employee privacy must give way to the public’s right to know.”
It was not immediately clear Wednesday what time Friday’s second vote on the request to the trustees would occur. But senators pushed for the body to bend rules and people’s schedules to get it done.
“I’m just gonna say one thing just to keep it real,” said professor Chiara Ferrari of the Media Arts, Design and Technology Department. “If we allowed a faculty member who had intercourse in his office to work at this university, I’m pretty sure we can suspend the rules.”
Michael Weber is a reporter at the Chico Enterprise-Record.
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Brian Kaufman 3 months ago3 months ago
When I was in grad school, it was entirely common for professors to not only have affairs with students, but quid pro quo demands were made in order for female students to receive both research grants and signatures on their completed and approved theses. That department chair was put on paid leave for a year and then returned to be department chair again. Later, as a professor in rural New England, another colleague (department chair) … Read More
When I was in grad school, it was entirely common for professors to not only have affairs with students, but quid pro quo demands were made in order for female students to receive both research grants and signatures on their completed and approved theses. That department chair was put on paid leave for a year and then returned to be department chair again. Later, as a professor in rural New England, another colleague (department chair) was again put on paid leave for having an affair with a student. That same professor would make many comments about the ways he would get even with anyone who crossed him – but we all knew his bark was worse than his bite. Later, at the same campus, male perpetrators of sexual assault were allowed to remain on campus and attend classes, even when their victims were in those same classes. Why? Tuition revenue. When this response or lack of one got out, the campus president who orchestrated the smoke and mirrors of campus justice quickly moved on, where at her next campus she was found to once again sweep any allegations of sexual misconduct on her new campus under the rug.
Five years later, it does seem that any college student can, if they wish, make any allegation against a professor and watch the consequences unfold, simply because the needle has moved so far in protecting college students from abuses of power.
Skye Knight Dent 3 months ago3 months ago
Wish the embezzlement complaints by seven CSUB students in the school of education in 2017 had been handled this way. We brought proof that the 60 plus page book by our professor (filled with uncredited articles and photo, as well as tons of typos) was never published. We traced articles stolen and reprinted to people back east at NPR and even Jay Z. But one of the deans came to class and … Read More
Wish the embezzlement complaints by seven CSUB students in the school of education in 2017 had been handled this way. We brought proof that the 60 plus page book by our professor (filled with uncredited articles and photo, as well as tons of typos) was never published. We traced articles stolen and reprinted to people back east at NPR and even Jay Z. But one of the deans came to class and threaten to get deported the parents of the Dreamers.
And over the summer, we all got letters from a dean saying that we were being kicked out because we were not “holistic”. In the fall, I showed up at a CSU board meeting to complain. The board sent it back to the individual. For us, that ended up being a game of leapfrog. And since CSUB had taken away our loan money, we could not afford to stay n fight the case. We never obtained our teaching credential