California school districts, enjoy it, make it last and spend it wisely, because you may never see an education budget like the one that Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Thursday.
Total state funding for schools and community colleges will be $128 billion.
That’s a dramatic increase from 2011-12 when, in the depths following the Great Recession, districts and community colleges got $47.3 billion in funding from Proposition 98, the formula that determines how much of the state’s general fund goes to TK-12 and community colleges. In 2022-23, the total increase in Prop. 98 funding alone will be $37.2 billion.
Higher education funding also increased by 5% for general funding with new spending planned for Cal Grants, the state’s financial aid program for college students.
Inflation is running high, and staff shortages are big in many districts and charter schools. So a portion of that new money will cover rising costs, pay raises, new hires and a couple of billion dollars in districts’ share of higher pension costs for teachers and other employees.
The bulk of new money will go toward new programs and grants, most spread out over several years.
Elementary school families, particularly in low-income neighborhoods, should see a tangible, even life-changing benefit starting this fall. Their districts will be funded to offer three hours of before- and after-school activities and six weeks of summer school. At a minimum, they must offer the programs to all low-income students and English learners.
Transitional kindergarten will roll out for 4-year-olds who will celebrate their birthday between Dec. 2 and Feb. 2. That, in turn, will create some more state-funded preschool openings for 3-year-olds — a relief for at least some parents facing crushing child care costs.
“This is a continuation of our whole education agenda. Between this year’s and last year’s budget, which was also momentous, we have put a lot of components in place,” said Ben Chida, chief adviser to Newsom. “But I put myself in the shoes of the parents who are wondering, ‘Oh, great, record funding, but how do I see it in my schools?’ It is incumbent on us to deliver results. The big make or break is implementation and execution. That’s on all of us. It’s a shared responsibility.”
A progressive tax system, in which the highest 1% of earners pay 50% of the state income tax, produces boom and bust cycles. We’ve seen that for the last 40 years. Some economists are predicting that a recession could slam the door on the boom this year. But the budget assumes state revenues — and Prop. 98 — will at least be flat for another year. And if things go south, the Prop. 98 rainy day reserve will be filled to the brim — $9.5 billion — to be tapped when needed.
To simplify the complex, what follows is a graphic guide to key elements of the budget.
Most of the remaining funding is for grants, new programs and program expansions. Some are ambitious, including large appropriations for after-school programs, new career pathways in computing, health and education, literacy coaches in high-poverty schools and teacher training in math with a focus on pre-K to 3.
The largest, the $7.9 billion Learning Recovery Emergency Fund, gives districts five years to spend the money, and comes on top of billions of dollars in federal and previous state Covid relief funding. Much of that money remains unspent, with many parents unhappy there’s a lack of their No. 1 priority: tutoring.
The Learning Recovery Emergency Fund is among the new programs that are either restricted to or targeted to school districts serving low-income students.
Districts have complained that one-time funding inhibits districts from hiring teachers, counselors and aides because they could be forced to lay them off when the money runs out. But other districts, like Long Beach and Los Angeles Unified, have hired large numbers of staff, on the assumption that retirements and staff attrition and good planning would prevent a problem.
Edgar Zazueta, executive director of the Association of California School Administrators, said it’s OK to invest in new people with dollars that can be used for an extended time — if districts have the reserves and a plan to avoid a fiscal cliff if funding is cut: but be cautious. He credited that advice as the “Mike Fine rule,” referring to the CEO of the Fiscal Crisis Management and Assistance Team, or FCMAT, a state agency that assists districts to avoid financial insolvency.
A number of the other new TK-12 programs also have spending deadlines of at least three years.
Here’s a rundown of significant appropriations:
Learning Recovery Emergency Fund
$7.9 billion, usable through 2027-28, with $650 million earmarked for community colleges.
TK-12 portion distributed to all districts — approximately $2,000 per child — tied to the numbers of English learners, low-income, foster and homeless students in a district.
Permissible uses include tutoring, learning recovery programs, literacy intervention and programs for pre-K to 3, after-school programs, health, mental health and social-emotional support, and actions to reduce or stabilize staff-to-student ratios (a flexible use).
Arts, Music and Instructional Materials Discretionary Block Grant
$3.56 billion, usable through 2025-2026
One of the few programs distributed based on a district’s total average daily attendance, about $600 per student.
Permissible uses: Don’t be fooled by the title, which stresses instructional materials; it can also be used for “operational purposes,” including “retirement and health care cost increases.” In other words, it’s very flexible.
Expanded Learning Opportunities Program
$4 billion, including $1 billion rolled over from last year
Funding will allow schools to add three hours of after-school programming for a nine-hour day and six weeks of summer enrichment programs for students who enroll. It will apply to all K-6 schools, with higher payments of $2,750 per English learner, low-income, foster or homeless youths in districts where those students comprise more than 75% of enrollment. These districts must offer the program to all students.
Per student payment in districts with fewer than 75% of high-needs students hasn’t been set but is expected to be about $1,250. These districts must offer the program to all high-needs students.
Golden State Pathways Program
$500 million in planning and implementation grants of up to five years
Program will promote regional partnerships of school districts, higher education institutions, community groups and employers to advance students from high school to careers in health, computer science, education, STEM, and education, including early ed. Priority districts will be those with lower than average rates of A-G course completion and higher than average homelessness and foster youth, school suspension and expulsion and dropout rates.
Grants will train and pay for literacy coaches, with grants of at least $450,000, usable through June 2027, in high-poverty schools in grades K-3 — those where at least 97% of students are English learners, low-income, homeless and foster children; $25 million will go to selected county offices of education to develop and provide training for educators to become literacy coaches and reading and literacy specialists.
Instead of issuing new state construction bonds, the state will spend $1.3 billion of what’s left from the 2016 bond and $2.9 billion from the state’s general fund in 2023-24 and 2024-25. Money will be distributed under the existing formula in which the state splits the cost of new construction with districts and pays 60% of renovation and modernization.
Other budget items include:
- $1.1 billion to add to the $3 billion from last year to create community schools in low-income neighborhoods.
- $184 million to establish teacher residencies for counselors in training, in which veteran counselors offer training and mentoring.
- $85 million for math professional development for teachers, led by the Fresno County Office of Education, with $35 million to develop math concepts and parent engagement for pre-K to 3, and $50 million for grades 4 to 12.
The state budget increases general funding for the University of California and California State University by 5%. CSU’s budget will increase from $4.22 billion in 2021-22 to $4.43 billion in 2022-23. UC’s budget will increase from $4 billion in 2021-22 to $4.2 billion in 2022-23.
The budget also includes a plan to expand Cal Grants, the state’s primary financial aid program, if funds are available: $364.8 million in 2024-25; $348.8 million in 2025-26 to reform the program and expand eligibility to 150,000 students.
EdSource reporter Michael Burke contributed to this report.
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Jodie Keller 9 months ago9 months ago
I really had hoped that the Governor would have recognized additional preschool programs serving the most vulnerable families in the State of California. The investment in our youth is welcomed but he completely forgot about the private providers and Head Start. Head Start and Early Head Start provides quality care and kindergarten readiness curriculum for children ages 0-5. These children will one day enter the K-12 system and deserve a chance to be … Read More
I really had hoped that the Governor would have recognized additional preschool programs serving the most vulnerable families in the State of California. The investment in our youth is welcomed but he completely forgot about the private providers and Head Start. Head Start and Early Head Start provides quality care and kindergarten readiness curriculum for children ages 0-5. These children will one day enter the K-12 system and deserve a chance to be ready. We too are suffering staff shortages and the staff deserve to be recognized as educators given the degrees they must hold to qualify as teachers.
Jennifer Wright 9 months ago9 months ago
If you don’t have the woman/man power for these programs it doesn’t mean a thing!
Jay 9 months ago9 months ago
I really hope this money actually reaches the classroom instead of once again being absorbed by district level coordinators and specialized programs with excessive administrative costs. If the money does not directly impact a student in the classroom (teachers, IAs, counselors), then it should not be spent. The state will never make the decision to tell districts how to spend the money, but the obvious directive would be to cap all class sizes and to … Read More
I really hope this money actually reaches the classroom instead of once again being absorbed by district level coordinators and specialized programs with excessive administrative costs. If the money does not directly impact a student in the classroom (teachers, IAs, counselors), then it should not be spent. The state will never make the decision to tell districts how to spend the money, but the obvious directive would be to cap all class sizes and to give teachers a salary adjustment to match inflation. This would not be considered a raise due to the importance of simply offering what should be an automatic cost of living adjustment.