Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
Library or police, a small town’s struggle puts a spotlight on library inequities across California
As a full return to in-person instruction in the fall seems more likely, almost everyone associated with public education is hoping for a return to some semblance of normalcy.
But with the global pandemic revealing long-standing inequities in stark and painful ways, returning to “normal” this fall would be a disservice to students and families, especially to those who experienced the greatest hardships.
Fortunately, unprecedented new federal and state resources (albeit on a one-time basis) allow districts a rare opportunity to invest in their students. School district superintendents across the state now face the challenge: how to focus on what will make a real difference for students and not get lost in the need to spend the money.
As two former superintendents who now have the privilege of working with dedicated leaders and leadership teams across the state, we’re heartened to partner with many thinking deeply about meeting the moment for their students. They are focused on those who have been disproportionately affected, while at the same time creating the conditions for long-term success. Taking a step back from what we’re hearing, we offer districts the following principles to guide their spending, along with encouragement to stick to them amid the coming clamor for dollars from many stakeholders.
Maintaining focus was critical at Burbank Unified, where Superintendent Matt Hill had already prioritized making sure underserved students were on track for college success. The pandemic increased the need for middle and high school students to have access to immediate support for credits lost during distance learning.
“It is critical that each of our students remain on track for college access,” Hill said. “This summer is the first step in that process.” He is not only investing in a robust summer school program. “This fall will have to be different to support our students,” he reflected. “We have to both support students who lost credits and keep them on track to meet A-G requirements. That won’t be accomplished overnight. This is a two- to three-year effort.”
Meanwhile, in Oxnard School District, Superintendent Karling Aguilera-Fort is thinking long term: “We are using the Student Profile — which outlines ideal student outcomes at graduation — as our guide, so everything that we are doing is connected to it and will be part of our strategic plan,” Aguilera-Fort said.
An important step in this process is creating additional time. “It is critical to invest in our staff to better serve our students,” he said. “We are adding professional learning days for teachers and school counselors to provide opportunities to learn, look at data, plan, design lessons.”
For Superintendent Adela Jones at Sanger Unified, students must be first. She is working directly with teachers and principals to determine exactly what their students need. This approach is essential in increasing instructional time for students.
“It is unfair to say that kids don’t understand a concept they were never taught,” Jones said. “We are going to monitor the impact the interventions have on our students throughout the school year and tailor our additional staff and resources based on what the students need, not what we have to spend.”
While each of these leaders works within a unique context, they are all thinking long term, avoiding quick fixes and resisting the temptation to say yes to more than they can actually do well.
Let’s join these leaders in holding ourselves and everyone in our organizations accountable to outcomes that actually make a lasting difference for students, especially for those who have historically been left behind.
•••
Steven Kellner and Laura Schwalm are both former superintendents who now work for California Education Partners, a nonprofit organization that supports California districts to engage in intentional collaborative, continuous improvement in the service of real results for students.
The opinions in this commentary are those of the authors. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.
The system has enrolled more in-state residents, but not enough to meet targets set by the state.
Two prominent organizations say the proposal would dismantle progress made to improve reading instruction for those students.
Fresno City College professor Tom Boroujeni is unable to fulfill his duties as academic senate president while on leave, the latest update reads.
This is a continuing EdSource series on proven innovations in higher education that relate to the problems facing California’s higher education systems.
Comments (1)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Jim 3 years ago3 years ago
What a ridiculous article. The LCFF has shown exactly what districts will do with the money. They will split it up among unions. administrators, and favored consultants. Kids will get nothing except an education in how the world works.