Photo: Rich Pedroncelli/AP Photo
Gov. Gavin Newsom at a press conference in April 2020.

On Dec. 30, 2020, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a $2 billion “Safe Schools for All” plan to encourage more schools to reopen for in-person instruction in 2021. T  For latest details on the plan issued by the Newsom administration, check out the Safe Schools for All Hub, published on Jan. 14, 2021.  The following answers some key questions on how the plan is intended to operate.

What is the rationale for the plan?

The Newsom administration believes that “in-person is the best setting to meet not only the core learning needs of students, but also their mental health and social-emotional needs.”

At the same time, his administration contends that safety is “foundational,” and that “the right precautions can effectively stop the spread of COVID-19 in schools — especially in elementary schools.”

Will it be safe to bring students back?

Gov. Newsom believes it is safe to bring students back to school, starting with the earliest grades, if health and safety practices are implemented and followed.

In a statement accompanying the plan, the administration argued the following:

  • Research across the globe shows that children get COVID-19 less often than adults, and when they do get sick, they get less sick than adults.
  • In studies of open schools in America and around the world, children do not seem to be major sources of transmission — either to each other or to adults.
  • The growing body of evidence is particularly strong for lower risks associated with elementary schools. 
  • Even in communities with many Covid cases, we do not see many outbreaks in schools. That’s because the right precautions can stop outbreaks before they start.

What incentives are there for districts to participate?

Districts will receive additional funding: a base amount of $450 per student if they file their application to participation by Feb. 1, or $337 per student if they file it by March, plus an additional amount per student based on the number of high needs students (low income students, English learners, foster and homeless children) in their district, as defined by the Local Control Funding Formula. Gov. Newsom said that the extra amount could be as much as $250 per student in addition to the base amount.

Does Newsom’s plan need legislative approval?

Yes.  He will seek “early action” by the Legislature to approve the plan so it can go into effect during the current school year.

Can all schools participate?

Only schools in counties with fewer than 25 positive coronavirus cases per 100,000 population can participate. As of Jan. 1, that means most schools won’t be able to participate, as most counties have infection rates of 25 or more.

What do schools have to do to participate?

Schools must submit a Covid-19 Safety Plan to local and state health authorities. Local health authorities have five days to approve or disapprove the plan.

Does the program extend to all children in all grades?

No, this only applies to children in grades K through 6, plus transitional kindergarten.

Will schools in counties in the so-called “purple” tier be allowed to reopen?

Yes, as long as the average daily rate of infections is under 25 positive cases per 100,000 residents.

Will children have to attend schools that reopen?

No. Schools will still have to offer distance learning for parents who don’t want their children to receive in-person instruction.

Where will the funds to pay for the program come from?

They will come out of extra state funding allocated for K-12 schools through the Proposition 98 formula that will be available as a result of an unexpected budget surplus this year. The funding will be included in the budget proposal Newsom is required to make by Jan. 10 for the coming fiscal year.

What about middle and high school students?

The proposal is silent on middle and high school students. For now, middle and high school students will continue to study via distance learning unless their schools opened for in-person instruction before their counties entered the “purple” Tier One list, or if they participate in small group classes, learning labs and support centers intended for foster, homeless and other students with the greatest needs.

Do school districts have to do anything extra to receive the funds?

Yes. Everyone in a school — both adults and children — have to be tested for the virus on a regular basis, even those who are have no symptoms. For districts in counties with less than an average of 14 positive cases per 100,000, everyone has to be tested every two weeks. In districts with a higher incidence rate, everyone would have to be tested weekly.

Everyone will be expected to wear masks. But school staff will be required to wear surgical masks, which will be distributed to schools at no cost by the state.

Will schools that have already opened for in-person instruction be able to participate in the program?

The materials released so far don’t address this issue directly.  But presumably these schools will be able to participate, as long as they meet the guidelines, and submit a health safety plan to local and state officials for approval.

Who will pay for Covid-19 testing?

The private health plans that employees already have as well as MediCal for those enrolled in the program are supposed to cover the costs of testing. For individuals who don’t have private insurance or are not enrolled in MediCal, schools districts will presumably have to cover the costs.  However, most health plans do not cover asymptomatic testing, so districts will have to cover these costs themselves.

When does the program start?

The program will be phased in, beginning on February 15 for students in transitional kindergarten through second grade, and for students in the third to sixth grade on March 15. By Feb. 1, districts must submit a Covid safety plan that has the approval of school employee unions and meets the new Cal/OSHA regulations. However, the timeline would be pushed back for districts in counties with high infection rates until the infection rates fall below 28 cases per 100,000 residents.

Does a county’s rate of infection have to be below 28 positive cases per 100,000 resident before a school or district can apply?

No.   A district can apply for the funds, and can only start using them when their positive cases fall below 28 cases per 100,000.

Do districts receive funds only for the students attending in-person?

No. Districts receive the base amount plus whatever additional amount they would receive in supplemental or concentration based on average daily attendance in the 2019-20 year for the entire school or district, not just for children in the grades where in-person instruction is offered.   However, districts must use the funds for the students in the grades in which they are offering in-person instruction.

What happens if a district doesn’t apply by Feb. 1? 

Districts can apply by March 1, for opening by March 15.  However, they will not get the full base grant of $450 per person, but rather will get a$337.50 per student.

How much support and opposition is there to the plan?

In general, the plan has received considerable support from some superintendents, professional associations and advocacy groups. However, several superintendents raised questions about the feasibility of implementing some health and safety practices, including the costs and logistics of testing that would involve testing of both staff and students.

What position have the two leading unions taken on the plan?

The California Teachers Association has expressed lukewarm support for the proposal. “There are many unanswered questions and the devil is always in the details,” said CTA President E. Toby Boyd. He said that the union continues to support in-person instruction, but not in schools in counties that are still on the “purple” Tier One list. “If teachers’ local unions adopt that stance, and counties are still on the “purple” list come February 15, it is unlikely that districts will be able to participate in the reopening plan,” Boyd said.

Jeff Freitas, president of the California Federation of Teachers, said the plan “is the starting point our state and its schools need to consider for in-person instruction,” but said that schools need to be “funded at a level that supports needed testing, tracing, PPE and high-quality instruction.”

As for other school workers, Max Arias, Executive Director of SEIU Local 99, said, “we look forward to moving safely and with due caution to more and more in-person instruction.”

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (10)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. ana Maria alongi 1 week ago1 week ago

    The only Covid test I did, using my health insurance (Anthem-Blue Cross), charged me $30 as a copay. I won’t be able to add $60 per month, if testing twice a week is required, to my monthly budget.

  2. Debbie 1 week ago1 week ago

    My doctor just told me that so many unnecessary tests are being done that it is overwhelming the system. Only those exposed or with symptoms should get tests. And Newsom wants staff and students tested weekly? Can you imagine the overwhelming pressure on our labs? More chances for mistakes, errors and obvious delays in test results. Ignorantt, unrealistic to think this will work!

  3. Rashmi Ahuja 1 week ago1 week ago

    What about substitute teachers? Are they also covered in the 1B plan? No one is talking about these substitutes. Please inform and announce.

  4. Debbie 1 week ago1 week ago

    Newsom is bribing districts with a cash carrot to put teachers at risk. I am disgusted! Frontline workers get full ppe to be around individuals or it’s a video call. Teachers get a mask! How are phonics and phonemic awareness going to be taught to our primary students when teachers are wearing a mask? They need to see my mouth! And there is no way any of these kiddos will have safe social distancing. Classroom … Read More

    Newsom is bribing districts with a cash carrot to put teachers at risk. I am disgusted! Frontline workers get full ppe to be around individuals or it’s a video call. Teachers get a mask! How are phonics and phonemic awareness going to be taught to our primary students when teachers are wearing a mask? They need to see my mouth! And there is no way any of these kiddos will have safe social distancing.

    Classroom square footage does not support 6 foot distancing in the majority of classrooms including mine! This is a slap in the face to educators. Have the Governor/Board members come visit my room when this happens – they won’t- too afraid. Unbelievable ignorance!

  5. Patrick Hale 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

    Check out the National COVID-19 School Response Dashboard,
    The latest numbers from Texas show that staff are infected at 175% compared to the community and 300% compared to students. It is unethical to force employees to do what you are not willing to do. How many local Boards are meeting face to face? That, at a minimum, should be required in districts who force staff back into the classroom. No education without vaccination!

  6. Igor 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

    First he helped create hysteria, while personally attending gatherings maskless, now he somehow has to “encourage” sheep not be afraid of the wolf, while still crying wolf.

  7. Ann 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

    Gov. Newsom needs to consider these children and the future of Covid-19 side effects. Why is that okay to send elementary kids back and not junior high or high school students?


    • T R Weller-Curtner 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

      Data, Ann, data. What does data show about infections rate for 5-10 year-olds? What about the structure of secondary vs. elementary schools in California?

  8. Susan Macias 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago

    I cant wait for. Gavin to be recalled!