Community colleges and their partners can do more to train students for the workforce, a process that should start as early as middle school, community college leaders and experts said Thursday.

During the EdSource Roundtable discussion, the first in a new series, panelists agreed that community colleges in California and elsewhere often fall short in preparing adult workers. To remedy that, they suggested strategies such as better career counseling and helping students get more work experience during their education.

Eloy Oakley, the systemwide chancellor overseeing California’s community colleges, said that while colleges have made some progress in preparing their students for careers, they are “not doing enough.” He said that, in many cases, for-profit colleges and others are doing a better job at enrolling adult learners than the community colleges.

“We’re not moving fast enough by any means, in no way, shape or form,” he said. “…We have to acknowledge that we have to become much more flexible, much more focused on upskilling, stacking credentials, giving students opportunities to personalize their needs in ways that we haven’t been able to do before.”

But it shouldn’t be left only to the community colleges to prepare students for their careers, panelists agreed, adding that the process should start in middle school or high school.

The roundtable hosted by EdSource Executive Director Anne Vasquez and Ashley Smith, higher education reporter, explored the role of community colleges in preparing workers for a post-pandemic economy.

Tony Carnevale, research professor and director of the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, said community colleges are one of the “key elements” of career training in the United States. Carnevale added that by 2030, there will be 168 million jobs, with 40% of them requiring a bachelor’s degree or higher, 30% requiring less than a bachelor’s degree but more than a high school diploma and 30% requiring a high school diploma.

Carnevale emphasized two possible solutions to preparing students for the future workforce: work-based learning and career counseling.

Carnevale said students should get some type of exposure to the workforce in middle school and that schools should prioritize getting students internships while they are in high school. Once students reach the college level, they should be in internships or getting work experience tied to their field of study. He said students especially need career counseling, but it’s expensive to deliver and not readily available.

Career counseling should also start early, Oakley agreed.

“Career counseling cannot begin in the second semester of a community college experience. There has to be career exploration that’s done in partnership with high schools and in middle schools,” he said. “Particularly in communities of color, we have to make more people aware of the career opportunities that exist and create easy-to-navigate pathways.”

Sergio Rosas, founder and CEO of Next Shift Learning, said community colleges need to work with a wide range of partners to train students.

“You need to be working with a host of partners: Workforce development boards. You need to be working with nonprofit organizations who are building. You need to work with philanthropy,” Rosas said.

Alex Davis, assistant vice chancellor of economic and workforce development for the Rancho Santiago Community College District in Orange County, highlighted a partnership between the company Snap and community college districts in Orange and Los Angeles counties.

Snap, maker of the social media photo application Snapchat, provides internships and job placement for students in the counties, Davis said.

Davis said that Snap pays those students to go through “academies” in design, engineering or storytelling. The students then get placed into internships and eventually jobs with Snap or its affiliated companies. The arrangement allows students to take the job opportunity while getting training.

“It’s a partnership that’s working really well in L.A. and Orange County,” Davis said.

Chauncy Lennon, vice president for learning and work at the Lumina Foundation, pointed to California’s High Road Training Partnerships initiative as an “exciting” program that prepares students for careers by investing in partnerships that help workers get jobs in industries, such as health care, transportation and hospitality.

In his budget proposal this year, Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed spending an additional $20 million to support the participation of California community colleges in the High Road Training Partnerships — a proposal that was supported by the Legislature.

“We can’t just hope that workers find those jobs,” Lennon said. “We’ve got to build a world in which community colleges work with industry to identify those jobs and then create the kind of pipelines, both in school and bringing people into community colleges who can then benefit from these training programs.”

At the federal level, there is bipartisan support in Congress for more job training, Carnevale said. He pointed to Sen. Tim Kaine’s (D-Va.) JOBS Act as one possible step that the federal government could take to support job training. That bill would make students in short-term education and training programs eligible for Pell Grants, making it easier for students to support themselves while participating in the training.

Carnevale said he’s not certain Congress will take any action on job training in the next two years because it’s not a “priority issue.”

“But we’ll get there eventually because it’s bipartisan,” he said.

For more on this EdSource Roundtable topic, please watch the video above.

One more thing… Help shape EdSource’s future, and tell us how to better serve you. Please take a few minutes to fill out our audience survey here.

Comments (2)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. peter Honan 5 months ago5 months ago

    I wanted to share my thoughts with you today concerning the crisis in modern education. I have been a secondary school teacher for 25 years and I have also spent 9 years in the private sector in the field of electronics manufacturing. My background has given me a unique perspective on what needs to be done to prepare students for the workplace and in turn make our country more competitive in international trade. The entire focus … Read More

    I wanted to share my thoughts with you today concerning the crisis in modern education. I have been a secondary school teacher for 25 years and I have also spent 9 years in the private sector in the field of electronics manufacturing. My background has given me a unique perspective on what needs to be done to prepare students for the workplace and in turn make our country more competitive in international trade.

    The entire focus in public education is test scores, and across the country, test scores are generally rising although not at the unrealistic rate required by No Child Left Behind. Teachers are generally getting better at teaching students what’s in the standards, but are the standards what students need to know in the modern workplace? Considering the amount of technology young people are surrounded with, you might be shocked to know that students are taught exactly nothing about how that technology works. Even the very basics of modern electronics are totally missing from the secondary school curriculum. Electronics, what makes cell phones, video games, computers, and the Internet work is totally absent from the science and mathematics curriculum. This was brought home to me when I was discussing the electromagnetic spectrum to a class of high school seniors. One of the more knowledgeable students asked “what’s that?” It turns out that the electromagnetic spectrum, which makes all modern communications (radio, WI-FI, TV and cell phones) possible, and also a multi-billion dollar public resource, was a total unknown to students who had made it to the final year of secondary education.

    To remedy this shocking injustice that the educational system has perpetuated on our youth, I propose the following remedies: a shift in emphasis to the one area of science which deals with electronics-physics. In my secondary school district, only 6% of science students took the physics end-of course-exam last year. If we really want to prepare our students for the modern workplace, all students must be exposed to physics.

    In the math field, students must learn the type of math that computers use, the surprisingly simple binary math system of ones and zeros. This leads to the study of Boolean algebra and digital logic circuits, the building blocks of all the technologies that we are surrounded with. Rebuilding our manufacturing base, with its higher paying jobs, can be facilitated with an increased emphasis on trigonometry and statistics-the two types of math most used on the factory floor.

    Our young people are the future of our country. Giving them the education that will enable them to compete in the modern workplace is crucial to our survival as a nation. I urge you to do all you can to bring about these changes in our educational system. Thank you.

    Peter Honan
    The Border Education Project

  2. Jeff Arthur 5 months ago5 months ago

    Dr. Oakley is right that for profit colleges are better at enrolling students, but that is because they outperform community colleges in nearly every metric, especially graduation rates and time to completion. Adult students understand that the biggest cost to them is time, and they are already behind and need to catch up fast if they want to switch to a career that requires a college education. Dr. Oakley is also correct that community colleges … Read More

    Dr. Oakley is right that for profit colleges are better at enrolling students, but that is because they outperform community colleges in nearly every metric, especially graduation rates and time to completion. Adult students understand that the biggest cost to them is time, and they are already behind and need to catch up fast if they want to switch to a career that requires a college education.

    Dr. Oakley is also correct that community colleges need to move faster and be more flexible. The fundamental block to that is their inherit structure that is very likely unchangeable. Faculty need to teach year-round, and they need to set the expectation that their adult students will attend full-time and year-round, and move through in prescribed pathways. Unfortunately, that is just a structure that will not be supported by the community college institution.