Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
Library or police, a small town’s struggle puts a spotlight on library inequities across California
In a development that would no doubt be welcomed by many aspiring college students and their parents, California should develop a common application form for admission to all levels of public higher education in California, including the state’s community colleges system.
Currently, students must apply to each system separately. The proposal is just one of myriad recommendations issued by a task force convened by Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration to come up with what it is calls “a roadmap for higher education after the pandemic.”
The common application outlined in the task force’s “Recovery with Equity” report released Tuesday would replace what it called “the currently overwhelming and Byzantine application and transfer processes.” To do so, the task force said, would require developing an “integrated technology platform” that currently doesn’t exist.
It is not clear how a common application for California would work, although it echoes ithe “common app” in place for over 600 mostly private colleges and universities nationwide.
The 20-member panel was organized by Lande Ajose, Newsom’s principal advisor on higher education, in consultation with Newsom’s Council for Post-Secondary Education which he established in 2019. The council is made up of the heads of all public education systems in California, labor leaders and others.
The taskforce detailed a plan that would aid California’s post-pandemic recovery so that by 2030, all of California’s public colleges would be inclusive, offer clear pathways to degrees, offer all public school students early college experiences and access to college preparatory courses, and support students’ basic needs such as internet and financial aid.
The report endorses some long-standing goals such as improving faculty and staff diversity, promoting student well-being, subsidizing internet access for eligible students and improving college affordability. But it also proposes building and expanding systems that would be new for the state:
In tandem with the growing recognition that students’ non-academic needs have a profound impact on their educational outcomes, the report advocates that students be able to have a single online tool allowing them to apply “all at once for the full spectrum of state services they qualify to receive (e.g., financial aid, CalFresh, housing programs, health/mental healthcare, subsidized childcare, transportation, internet/technology support, etc.).”
The goal, Ajose said, is to emerge from the pandemic “with a vision for economic recovery with a post-secondary ecosystem that is more equitable, more resilient and more coordinated.” A key part of that vision, Ajose said, is to “elevate the number and diversity of Californians who earn a degree, with a focus on improving outcomes for Black, Latinx, Asian Pacific Islander, Indigenous and adult learner students who disproportionately have been denied opportunity and access to higher education.”
The task force endorsed the expanded dual admission program (not to be confused with dual enrollment) proposed by Newsom in his January budget which would allow students admitted to a community college to simultaneously be admitted to a specific California State University or University of California campus, if they met all the requirements for transfer to a four-year institution.
Crucially, the “streamlined and unified admissions process” the task force has in mind would require creating a single repository for student transcripts from high schools, community colleges, CSU and UC. Initially, the priority would be on high school and community college transcripts. Such a repository is what planners envision for the Cradle to Career Data System currently being developed to track a student’s trajectory from preschool into the workplace.
The leaders of the state’s public and private colleges and universities applauded the task force’s recommendations.
“The Task Force’s forward-thinking recommendations will ensure that the (California State University) prepares future generations of diverse leaders of all backgrounds who will lead and contribute to the Golden State’s recovery as well as its robust growth, benefiting all communities, in the years to come,” CSU Chancellor Joseph I. Castro said.
Community colleges Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley said the taskforce’s recommendations complement the Vision for Success initiative, the system’s blueprint focused on drastically improving success rates of community college students.
State Board of Education president Linda Darling-Hammond endorsed the notion of clarifying and streamlining pathways from preK-12 schools to higher education, including emphasizing what she called Linked Learning pathways to careers and dual credit options that “smooth transitions to our systems of higher education.” Those, she said, “will yield long-term benefits to our state.”
As for distance learning — a mode of instruction that almost everyone anticipates will remain a central part of the postsecondary landscape after the pandemic — the task force says that California should make sure that students have internet access and if necessary underwrite the costs of providing it. That could be done by increasing funds for internet access in Cal Grant B financial aid packages, and through partnerships with the private sector.
The task force underscored the crucial importance of getting a college degree for a student’s later success in the labor market. It noted that more than half of California’s labor force with a high school degree or less had filed for unemployment since March 2020. That compared with 13% of workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher who had filed for unemployment. Disturbingly, almost all Black workers with a high school degree or less — 99% — had filed for unemployment in 2020, as well as 75% of the Asian Pacific Islanders. That compared with 52% of white and 33% of the Latino workers with that level of education who filed for unemployment.
The system has enrolled more in-state residents, but not enough to meet targets set by the state.
Two prominent organizations say the proposal would dismantle progress made to improve reading instruction for those students.
Fresno City College professor Tom Boroujeni is unable to fulfill his duties as academic senate president while on leave, the latest update reads.
This is a continuing EdSource series on proven innovations in higher education that relate to the problems facing California’s higher education systems.
Comments (4)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
willson 6 months ago6 months ago
California should also provide an application for international students.
Ziaikram 2 years ago2 years ago
The Canadian government provides vast opportunities to their local students as well as for international students after this post-pandemic. I am sure you are not going to miss these golden opportunities. Here you can find the upcoming Canadian Scholarships 2023 Without IELTS.
Zia Khan 3 years ago3 years ago
The American government providing a vast opportunities to their local students as well as for international students after this post pandemic. Don’t miss these golden opportunities. You can also apply for Fulbright Scholarships which is fully funded.
Lora Cattell 3 years ago3 years ago
Unfortunately, I do not see anything here that will address the real problem with students’ ability to get a degree in 4 years. Universities don’t hold enough classes for students to complete their GE in a reasonable in time. If you are a freshman, the classes are “full,” then students are put on a “waiting list.” If you are unable to get in, then you might have to wait for another year. … Read More
Unfortunately, I do not see anything here that will address the real problem with students’ ability to get a degree in 4 years. Universities don’t hold enough classes for students to complete their GE in a reasonable in time. If you are a freshman, the classes are “full,” then students are put on a “waiting list.” If you are unable to get in, then you might have to wait for another year. This especially occurs with needing to take 1A, 1B, and 1C. Heaven forbid you fail a class, then you need to re-take it in a year? Then, what about the other classes that you cannot enroll in because you need this as a prerequisite?
It’s like dominos. Thanks for writing your article.