Credit: Allison Shelley for American Education

In an online meeting with school superintendents Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom said he’s willing to negotiate with the Legislature all aspects of the $2 billion incentive program he proposed to encourage school districts to send their youngest students back to school, starting in-mid February.

“Completely,” Newsom said when asked by Wesley Smith, executive director of the Association of California School Administrators, whether he would consider changing components of his proposal. “This is about putting out a plan. It’s about being iterative. It’s not about being ideological.”

The association serves administrators from the state’s approximately 1,000 school districts. Smith interviewed Newsom for about 25 minutes. Although the meeting was not open to the public, EdSource listened to the meeting through a sharable link that an attendee provided.

Under Newsom’s “Safe Schools for All” incentive plan, school districts would receive $450 to $700 per student if they offered in-person instruction to students in transitional kindergarten through 2nd grade by Feb. 15 and third grade to sixth grade by March 15. Districts that started the process a month later would be eligible for $100 per student less than that amount. Districts would have to have comprehensive health and safety protections in place, including Covid testing.

The initial Feb. 1 deadline for districts to file their Covid safety plans to qualify for the program will pass on Monday without the legislative approval needed to implement the program. Discussions with legislative leaders are continuing, and Newsom expressed hope that an agreement could be reached within days, “not weeks.”

School officials have criticized various aspects of Newsom’s plan, including an ambitious timetable for setting up surveillance Covid testing of both staff and students showing no symptoms of the virus. They also say the dates for bringing students back to campuses amid record deaths from the virus are unrealistic.

But Newsom defended the proposal as necessary to prod districts to start planning now for the reopening of schools.

“I’m not naive about the stress around these dates, but we had to plant the proverbial flag,” he said. “We had to sort of establish a framework and say, ‘All right, well, let’s, let’s come together, try to negotiate.’”

And he pointed to fast-declining rates of Covid infection that add relevance and impetus to move ahead.

On Jan. 4, the state reached a record 60,000 daily cases of Covid-19; the latest seven-day average is 16,000 cases per day. The rate of positive tests for Covid was 14.3% on Jan. 4; the latest seven-day average is 7.5%, he said.

Newsom warned that the “pressure that’s mounting” to reopen schools “is going to pale compared to where we’ll be in a few weeks, if these (declining) numbers continue, and other districts across the country start moving in the direction that the new administration (of President Biden) wants them to move in.”

Covid case rates by individual counties, not the statewide number of cases, would determine when students could return to school. The threshold for sending back elementary students would be 25 or fewer positive cases per 100,000 county residents.

Although most county rates have exceeded that threshold since Christmas, a rapid decline could change the outlook. On Wednesday, Barbara Ferrer, the director of public health in Los Angeles County, one of the hardest hit areas in the state, projected that infection rates might fall to the threshold for elementary students by mid-February.

Newsom also reiterated that teachers and school staff would remain a top priority for Covid vaccinations. That has been a source of confusion during the past week, as the state expanded vaccinations to those over 65, who comprise 75% of the deaths from Covid. Some counties have begun vaccinating teachers, and Newsom praised the city of Long Beach, which has its own health department, for doing that. But other counties have not started vaccinating teachers, due to vaccine shortages, or are not prioritizing teachers over the elderly.

Newsom said that school employees, along with health care workers, workers in emergency services and food manufacturing and agricultural workers are the only groups of employees to have a priority status. He drew an analogy to getting in line to board an airplane. First come those over 75, who are the first-class passengers, then those over 65, who are the business class, and then teachers and staff, “the premium class,” he said.

“That’s all of you. And then we get to general boarding, the rest of us down the line. And so we’re just, we’re trying to move this as quickly as possible,” he said, to avoid having leftover vaccine sitting in a freezer.

He didn’t say, in response to Smith’s question, that the state would intervene to ensure all counties are giving priority to teachers. The state’s health care providers and counties will continue to face a supply shortage, he said, despite promises by the federal government to gradually increase the vaccines in coming months and to bring on a new source of 100 million doses of the vaccine, Johnson & Johnson, by late spring.

Superintendents also have complained that the latest guidance by the California Department of Public Health could force districts to close schools that have opened for in-person instruction for some students or in a hybrid model. They have cited pressure to reopen negotiations with employee unions on new issues and the cost of more extensive Covid testing requirements than they have been providing.

In questions following Newsom’s remarks, Dr. Naomi Bardach, a UC San Francisco professor who is leading the inter-agency Safe Schools for All Team, said the administration would create a process to permit some flexibility from the new rules “in very specific instances” — but only if districts have a comprehensive Covid safety plan in place and can document that what they are doing is working.

She said that she and the administration have “no intention” of sending students who are currently receiving in-person instruction back to distance learning as long as the conditions in school are safe, she said.

Bardach also described developments in Covid testing that could considerably simplify the administration of the test and reduce the cost. One is self-performed testing by staff and, with supervision, even young children; the other is the use of pooled testing in which multiple samples are tested at once with followup testing only if there is a positive result; the state-built lab in Valencia is working on that option, she said.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (10)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Kirstie 5 months ago5 months ago

    Secondary needs clearer guidance. The small group model does not work well in large public schools 1K-2K students per site. We need a path that allows the schools to open with their current schedules. Sports are opening, and classes are not.

  2. James 5 months ago5 months ago

    At the end of the day, everybody’ll be happy as long as safety protocols are strictly implemented and followed.

  3. Finna 8 months ago8 months ago

    Seriously people/governor? Schools do not have the resources and funds to test kids/staff for Covid. The schools would lose money even if they accept his new plan for February. LOL, Funny, my district has exactly 2 registered school nurses for just under 10,000 students! !

  4. Jay Russell 8 months ago8 months ago

    Does anyone know of developments with the testing requirements? In Alameda County I am hearing that testing will not be required for reopening, or maybe districts don’t need to have it ready by Feb.1 or the first day of school?

    Hard to find info up to date.

  5. Eliàna Alida Quinet 8 months ago8 months ago

    I strongly agree that all children should be back to in person classes by the dates gov. Newsom has set. My 11 yr old granddaughter has missed almost all of her last year at the elementary school she's attended since kindergarten. I taught adult community college nursing students for almost 20 yrs. Teaching is challenging and rewarding, and I felt very adequately compensated. But I found my time was manageable since I really worked only … Read More

    I strongly agree that all children should be back to in person classes by the dates gov. Newsom has set.

    My 11 yr old granddaughter has missed almost all of her last year at the elementary school she’s attended since kindergarten. I taught adult community college nursing students for almost 20 yrs. Teaching is challenging and rewarding, and I felt very adequately compensated. But I found my time was manageable since I really worked only 8 months/yr though paid for 12. It was what some would call a “cushy” job.

    So I can’t imagine telling students (and parents in this situation) that I wouldn’t go back when the governor asked me to. Teachers were saying they would “follow the science,” so why, when case rates are decreasing and even Dr. Fauci says schools are the “safest places to have open in a pandemic”?

  6. SM 8 months ago8 months ago

    The current plan offers money to school districts already allocated through LCFF, but strings have been attached by requiring schools to regularly test their teachers, staff, and students. Therefore, schools have no incentive to accept the plan as the money is already promised; in fact, the districts must agree to do more. Any plan from the governor should include money not allocated by LCFF/Prop 98 if there is to be a motivation to open schools. This … Read More

    The current plan offers money to school districts already allocated through LCFF, but strings have been attached by requiring schools to regularly test their teachers, staff, and students. Therefore, schools have no incentive to accept the plan as the money is already promised; in fact, the districts must agree to do more.

    Any plan from the governor should include money not allocated by LCFF/Prop 98 if there is to be a motivation to open schools. This money should only go to districts that physically reopen to 50% or more of their student population; this will accommodate students who are not prepared to return at this time.

    All testing for Covid should be funded using Federal or State money allocated to health departments (e.g. Medi-Cal, CARES) and not the schools.

  7. Giselle Galper 8 months ago8 months ago

    Secondary needs clearer guidance. The small group model does not work well in large public schools 1K-2K students per site. We need a path that allows the schools to open with their current schedules. Sports are opening, and classes are not.

  8. JG 8 months ago8 months ago

    This is all well and good, everything is up for negotiation. While the teachers union will get them, undue recognition, vaccines and allow them to work from home, it will be their assistants and support staff making $15/hr or less that will be getting packets ready, taking care of and teaching the kids. Basically keeping the school running, like the always do. The assistants and support staff will come home every day after the schools … Read More

    This is all well and good, everything is up for negotiation. While the teachers union will get them, undue recognition, vaccines and allow them to work from home, it will be their assistants and support staff making $15/hr or less that will be getting packets ready, taking care of and teaching the kids. Basically keeping the school running, like the always do.

    The assistants and support staff will come home every day after the schools open and be -literally- sick and tired from supporting the teachers’ “mission” and some will die.

  9. Christopher A Ross 8 months ago8 months ago

    Many of our teachers prefer online schooling. But we need to reverse and put our children first now. Parents have been bending over backwards accommodating the teachers unions. Our children are the product. If you can’t produce or are afraid, then let someone else who can do the job step in. This is uncalled for behavior. I think Newsom is fed up too!

    Replies

    • Dan Plonsey 8 months ago8 months ago

      As a teacher, I can assure you that very, very few teachers prefer online teaching. I don’t know any. It is not rewarding to lecture to a bunch of quiet icons on zoom. This is not why we became teachers! We do prefer for our students, their families, and their communities to stay safe — and yes, we’d like to protect ourselves and our families as well.