Credit: Jan Flatley-Feldman/The Daily Californian
Ward Connerly, a driving force behind Proposition 209, at UC Berkeley in 2011.

Twenty-four years after he led efforts that banned affirmative action in California, former UC Regent Ward Connerly is dismissive of the idea that those efforts are his legacy.

His legacy, he said recently, “is the legacy that was established back in 1776 when the structure of our society was outlined. When I came into this world, I inherited that. I don’t want to sound like I’m super patriotic, although I probably am.”

His reference to the nation’s founding is, in essence, Connerly’s world view of a color-blind America where racism “is no longer a moral issue,” where the killing of George Floyd wasn’t about race, and where all anyone has to do to succeed is “take advantage of opportunity.”

Back in California temporarily from Idaho where he moved five years ago, Connerly, 81, who is Black, is leading efforts to urge voters to reject Proposition 16, which would overturn 1996’s Proposition 209. It banned public agencies in California from making hiring, contracting and student admission decisions based on race or gender.

In a wide-ranging interview with EdSource, Connerly praised Donald Trump as the nation’s first truly “color-blind” president, said “white nationalists” were, like him, “super patriots,” and said he feared an increased exodus of whites from California if affirmative action returns.

The killing of Floyd in May in Minneapolis was the result of a badly applied police tactic and not a symbol of systemic racism in America, he said, and called efforts to strike down Prop. 209 a power grab, not a fight against injustices.

Connerly said he was “horrified” at images of now-former Police Officer Derek Chauvin with his knee on Floyd’s neck.

Chauvin “had not thought through what happens when you put your weight, the weight of your full body on a human being’s neck. What the hell do you think’s going to happen? Maybe there is some tender way you can do it” without causing harm. “But I don’t see it.”

Connerly did not see what so many others saw in Floyd’s killing — the impetus for a new civil rights movement aimed at long-standing inequities and systemic racism against people of color.

Following Floyd’s death, Connerly said he dreaded what “would happen in regard to the race issue, because it provided a leverage point for those who want to do more than remove a (police) tactic.”

Liberals were doing “some things that have nothing to do with law enforcement. And that is what Prop. 16 represents. It’s not about George Floyd. It’s about trying to reshape the contours of power in America, in California.”

In Sacramento, lawmakers, spurred by Floyd’s killing and the accompanying movement to eliminate racial inequities, voted to put Prop. 16 on the November ballot to overturn the state’s ban on affirmative action, an action long pushed by the chair of the Legislative Black Caucus, Assemblymember Shirley Weber, D-San Diego.

Weber scoffed at Connerly’s assessment.

“George Floyd made my case,” she said in an interview. “Racism is real.”

Connerly, she said, “has always lived in a different world. He also denies realities; he denies the reality that Blacks live in this country.”

But Connerly predicted peril if affirmative action returns.

“I know that it is going to lead to some real, real problems,” he added, predicting white flight. “And they are doing that. I have encountered an unbelievable number of white people in Idaho who abandoned California over the last five years.”

He was also dismissive of affirmative action helping Latinos overcome a widening gap between those graduating from high school and those admitted to the UC system: 52% vs. 29%.

While calling that gap “troubling,” Connerly said affirmative action won’t fix it.

“When we say Latino, I can find any number of Latinos who are as white as anyone on the planet,” he said. “They may have more vowels in their last name than others. If there are a lot of those, do they count as white or Latino?”

Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, ripped Connerly as “blatantly racist.”

He “is simply obsessed with the growth of the Latino community in California” and is “quite jaded and quite uninformed, and uses racial stereotypes,” said Saenz.

Connerly also criticized calls to diversify the academic ranks in the CSU, UC and California community colleges, where whites dominate the faculties.

Blacks, for instance “damn well better get comfortable with the fact that you’re going to be the only brown face in the room, probably in the workplace, wherever.”

And he scoffed at the idea that having professors “that look like you” might “inspire you to do better in school.”

To diversify academic ranks, schools can “have visiting professors or seminars or invite someone every fourth week,” he said. But diversifying faculty ranks to reflect student demographics “falls on its face as a rationale for justifying race preferences.”

Connerly lauded Trump. “I think that his instincts are generally good. I think he genuinely starts from the point that I respect and admire and that he is president of all people,” he said. “I think that not making a big issue of race is good for the country right now.”

Eva Paterson, an Oakland civil rights lawyer who heads the Yes on Prop. 16 campaign, called Connerly’s remarks “reprehensible on so many levels. It just seems like he hates. He’s causing real horror to people of color.”

Connerly said he’s heard all the criticisms before.

“I just don’t think in terms of Black, white, Latino,” he said. “And therein probably lies the fact that I’m swimming upstream with a lot of people, especially Black people. I just believe that once you start classifying the human race into various subdivisions and you start meting out benefits on the basis of that, you’re going to screw up.”

EdSource data journalist Daniel J. Willis contributed to this report.

EdSource's trusted, in-depth reporting has never mattered more.

With the coronavirus affecting every aspect of California's education, demand for EdSource's reporting has increased tremendously.

We can meet this demand, with help from readers like you.

From now through December 31, NewsMatch will match your one-time gift or your new monthly donation for 12 months.

Your contribution ensures that EdSource’s content continues to be available for free – without a paywall or ads.

Make your donation today to DOUBLE your impact.

Share Article

Comments (9)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Gabriel E. 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    I am concerned that he would argue against data and does not see that for who he is. Statistics showed the number of minorities admitted into higher institutions has reduced drastically since the Prep' 209. He will probably argue against 'Redlining and the racial policies by the US Housing Authority, de jure segregation, etc. Please watch this video https://www.segregatedbydesign.com/ to understand while Prop 16 is a good way forward. We need to accept … Read More

    I am concerned that he would argue against data and does not see that for who he is. Statistics showed the number of minorities admitted into higher institutions has reduced drastically since the Prep’ 209. He will probably argue against ‘Redlining and the racial policies by the US Housing Authority, de jure segregation, etc. Please watch this video https://www.segregatedbydesign.com/ to understand while Prop 16 is a good way forward. We need to accept responsibility and remedy the harm that has been done to our fellow Americans (the black community to be specific.)

    https://www.segregatedbydesign.com/

  2. Linda 1 month ago1 month ago

    Thank you, Mr. Connerly. You are a breath of reality in the current atmosphere of “political correctness.” The people quoted against you show their bias by the emotional arguments they try to make.

  3. Edwina Jones 1 month ago1 month ago

    Connerly has always hated being Black. Unfortunately for him, it's something he cannot change. So he takes it out on all people of color. Year ago there was a 60 Minutes segment where it was disclosed he makes no effort to keep in touch with family in the South. It appeared he was suffering from "Imitation of Life" if you recall the movie. It's sad to see someone not learn anything over the years and … Read More

    Connerly has always hated being Black. Unfortunately for him, it’s something he cannot change. So he takes it out on all people of color. Year ago there was a 60 Minutes segment where it was disclosed he makes no effort to keep in touch with family in the South. It appeared he was suffering from “Imitation of Life” if you recall the movie. It’s sad to see someone not learn anything over the years and continue running away from who they are, while also working to keep others of their ethnicity in subjugation to those he yearns to be.

    Replies

    • LR 4 weeks ago4 weeks ago

      He absolutely hates being black. Ditto to this entire comment. Terrible…

  4. Leon Breckenridge 1 month ago1 month ago

    Ward Connerly lives in a fantasy where everything he is saying does not exist. It is a shame he was able to spew such hatred at a high level of education.

  5. hap 1 month ago1 month ago

    What a wise person. We so need more of these people who see black-and-white and beyond to express these opinions.

  6. Dr. Patricia Sullivan 1 month ago1 month ago

    The sad thing here is that he’s only talking about himself. What kind of leader is he? A leader that defines the world based only on their own experiences is at best a singular example and at worst a poster child for a very specific cause. Connerly was used by the White republicans of his era to speak the words they didn’t want to say because they didn’t want to take the heat.

    Replies

    • Leon Breckenridge 1 month ago1 month ago

      Speaking truth to power.