Gov. Gavin Newsom’s “sounding of the alarm” to beat back the surge of the Covid-19 virus represents a severe setback for efforts to further reopen schools in California, as millions more students now attend schools in counties barred from offering face-to-face instruction in regular classes.
On Monday, Newsom applied what he called an “emergency brake” on reopening schools and businesses in almost every part of the state, based on coronavirus rules announced months ago. Of the state’s 58 counties, 41 counties are now on the Tier One purple list, the most restrictive of the state’s coronavirus monitoring list.
To get on that list, color-coded purple, counties must have a daily average of seven or more new Covid-19 cases per 100,000 residents as well as an average 8% positivity testing rate over the previous seven days.
As recently as last week, only 13 counties serving 3.5 million students were on the Tier One list. The dramatic increase means that counties serving 5.8 million of the state’s 6.1 million public school students will be affected. At least some of those students are already participating in some form of face-to-face instruction, but it is not known how many because there is no statewide tally. Under state regulations, schools who have already begun to offer in-person instruction can continue to do so, even though they are on the purple list.
The issue of in-person instruction is a complex one. Being out of school has fueled concerns about possibly long term learning loss, especially among students who are already lagging behind their peers, and also about its social emotional impact on children. At the same time, many educators and parents are choosing to stick with distance learning, despite its downsides, until they are persuaded that it is safe to return to school for face-to-face instruction.
Schools in Tier One counties in California can still apply for waivers to provide in-person instruction for students in kindergarten through the sixth grade, or to serve some of their highest-needs students in small groups, which could include special education, foster or homeless students, for example.
“Otherwise, schools may not open for in-person instruction until the county has been in the substantial (red) tier for two weeks,” the California Department of Public Health said in a statement issued on Thursday. The purple tier indicates that incidence of the virus is “widespread,” whereas the red tier is where the virus is less severe, but still “substantial.” Orange refers to “moderate” incidence of the virus, with yellow indicating a “minimal” presence.
Especially as the Thanksgiving holidays approach, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond said, “this is a time for an abundance of caution to monitor and to move slowly, and to do all that we can to stem further spread so that we can get to a place where we can safely reopen schools.”
For more of EdSource’s interview with Supt. Thurmond, go here.
Until just a month ago, the number of counties in the purple tier had been dipping steadily since schools began instruction for the current school year. That had raised hopes among many school administrators and parents that many more students would soon be able to return for in-person instruction.
An EdSource survey just two weeks ago showed that the number of districts bringing students back on to school campuses was accelerating rapidly. In 21 of the state’s 58 counties, all the school districts were either offering some form of in-person instruction for students, or were planning to do so within days or weeks.
Newsom’s announcement Monday is bringing all that momentum to a sudden halt. “We are now moving backward, not forward,” Newsom said during a press briefing in the State Capitol.
Even more disconcerting is that tentative plans for many California schools to open in January — now just six weeks away — seem unrealistic. “It’s certainly possible that they could open,” said Thurmond. “But we’re going to really need to monitor data for the next few weeks, and use that as our guide to determine whether in fact schools will be able to open at that time.”
Mt. Diablo Unified, which includes Concord, was preparing to start phasing in face-to-face instruction Jan. 11, but Superintendent Adam Clark said that the rising number of Covid-19 cases in the county will likely force the district to re-think its plans.
“What I think can happen is that we can start serving some of our higher-need students who are really struggling,” Clark said. “That may look different from full hybrid reopening, and if the trends continue to the negative we can reposition ourselves to set up a system to welcome smaller groups of those students.”
In Orange County, most of the county’s 27 districts had already brought students back for in-person instruction — in certain grades or for part of the school day or week — in larger numbers than probably any other county.
County Superintendent of Schools Al Mijares said that if health conditions continue to deteriorate, districts may have to rethink their in-person offerings, but only if the pandemic were to take a heavier toll. “We have to be resolute in our thinking,” he said. “For us to slam on the brake and come to a screeching halt, so that by the time the train stops, everyone is on the floor, we don’t favor that model. We have to take it one day at a time, and work with the California Department of Education and the Department of Public Health and be aware of the dynamics as they play out district by district.”
Some districts weren’t directly affected by being placed in the purple tier. West Contra Costa Unified and Fresno Unified, for example, had not begun offering in-person instruction to most of its students and agreed with their teachers unions that they would only do so once the county moved from the red to the orange or “moderate” tier. They were still far away from that tier.
John Sasaki, spokesman for Oakland Unified, said that though Alameda County went from the orange to the purple tier, the district was “months away” from being able to offer broad in-person instruction, though small learning hubs offered to students with special needs will continue.
Some school districts were already feeling the pain of being put on the purple tier over the last week. Last Tuesday, Sacramento, San Diego and Stanislaus counties moved back into that category after being in a less restrictive tier.
At least three small Sacramento County districts — River Delta Unified, Galt Joint Union Elementary and Elverta Joint Elementary district — with a combined enrollment of just under 6,000 students, had to call off their reopening plans.
Also affected was Elk Grove Unified, the state’s fifth-largest district with 65,000 students. The district had negotiated an agreement with its teachers’ union that if the county went from the red to the less-restrictive orange tier, teachers would return to school this week. The district was just a week away from entering the orange tier, said Elk Grove’s superintendent Chris Hoffman. But instead things have moved in the opposite direction.
As a result, the district’s reopening plans are on hold. “Now we are not in the business of being able to reopen schools,” Hoffman said.
Although it could affect the district’s longer term plans, Alum Rock Unified School District in San Jose wasn’t immediately affected by Santa Clara County’s move to the purple tier, Superintendent Hilaria Bauer said.
“Alum Rock has the highest contagion in our county, but we have been able to open small learning care pods for the neediest of students,” Bauer said. “They come to our sites and connect to virtual learning (from there). We have about 20 students per site, and they are monitored by our partners in the after-school programs and our principals.”
As for whether schools will be able to open in January, state schools’ chief Thurmond said it is “certainly possible” that they could. But, he said, “we’re going to really need to monitor data for the next few weeks and use that as our guide to determine whether, in fact, schools will be able to open at that time.”
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Jim 2 years ago2 years ago
What about Newsom’s own children in private school. Are they still in-person?
Adam Hampton 2 years ago2 years ago
A key reason some private schools are open is that they lack teacher associations (unions) to stand up and fight for teacher workplace protections. Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions. Private school teachers are legendarily under-compensated and not represented by anyone fighting for their best interests. The governor needs to set common statewide standards for reopening schools (as the seven largest districts have urged him to). We are facing a man-made crisis … Read More
A key reason some private schools are open is that they lack teacher associations (unions) to stand up and fight for teacher workplace protections. Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions. Private school teachers are legendarily under-compensated and not represented by anyone fighting for their best interests.
The governor needs to set common statewide standards for reopening schools (as the seven largest districts have urged him to). We are facing a man-made crisis within the COVID crisis. We’re not making it any easier on ourselves!
Personally, I find it ridiculous for public figures – particularly liberals – to enroll their children in private schools while representing/guaranteeing the right to free public education. Public school teachers should also have enough faith in public schools to enroll their children in them. Just my 2 cents there…from a fairly liberal guy.