Theresa Harrington/EdSource Today
DeJean Middle School is the only West Contra Costa Unified middle school in Richmond, Calif.

The superintendent in West Contra Costa Unified says his district is losing enrollment as students finish sixth grade. Rather than move on to middle school, they often jump to charter and private schools.

Superintendent Matthew Duffy thought he had a solution by converting six K-6 elementary schools into K-8 schools, which feed into DeJean Middle School, the only middle school in Richmond. The district could even convert that school into an arts campus to attract students from across the district.

“We’re now proposing that we begin that transition next year,” Duffy said at Wednesday’s board meeting, adding that the district, which includes Richmond and other communities, surveyed parents at the six schools and found that at least 80 percent of 6th grade families would send their children to the elementary schools if they offered 7th grade next year and 8th grade the year after that.

Duffy proposed putting the plan in motion by Jan. 21, but he was shut down by the school board, middle school staff and some community members, who said he needed to seek board approval before he could move forward. They also said that he should better engage the community about the idea and further research the pros and cons of such a change. 

Duffy wanted to finalize the transition by next Tuesday when open enrollment begins in the district, to ensure parents and students would have the option next year of staying in elementary schools that would begin offering 7th and 8th grades in the next two years. 

His attempt to announce the plan as a done deal for next year, however, backfired. 

“I just feel like we’ve had no serious analysis,” said board member Tom Panas. “I would want to see data about how the other new K-8s are doing,” he added, referring to the three other district elementary schools that were converted to K-8s last year.

Duffy’s decision to announce the change before seeking board approval is causing confusion in the community, where some elementary school parents have already received letters from the district informing them that they could send their children to their elementary schools instead of to the middle school next year. It also stunned the DeJean Middle School staff, including the principal, who said they have been making progress toward academic and attendance goals, as well as with staff retention.

Nearly two dozen speakers opposed the plan, saying it was too rushed and not well thought out or communicated to the staff and the community. No one spoke in favor of the proposal, which would affect the Wilson, Nystrom, King, Lincoln, Grant and Coronado elementary schools, that are all in Richmond.

But some African American parents, who earlier in the meeting persuaded the board to adopt a new plan to spend $7 million on improving supports for African American students, especially at schools with a high population of those students such as DeJean Middle School and the six elementary schools, said they felt like their campuses were being “targeted.” Some also said middle school provides students with important opportunities to mature and to enjoy options such as band and sports that may not be available at elementary schools.

Those parents who want their children to attend a middle school might have to spend more time transporting them to middle schools farther away from their homes. 

Emma Erbach, executive director of the United Teachers of Richmond teachers’ union, blasted Duffy’s presentation, calling it “a disgrace” that was “shoddy and misleading and based on false data,” noting that the surveys were not comprehensive.

“The unions were not notified,” she said angrily. “My teachers were calling me crying over the weekend. Your poor decision-making, Matthew Duffy, has caused trauma to the community.”

Board member Mister Phillips agreed with Panas that more details were needed before the district could commit to such a change.

“Anytime we’re talking about closing schools, that’s not a decision for staff to ever make,” he said. “That’s a decision that should always be made up here (on the board dais) with input from staff and the larger community.”

Phillips said he had looked at the test scores for the elementary schools and that most were doing worse than DeJean, so he questioned how leaving students at their elementary sites would help them. Several DeJean teachers pointed out that the students they receive in 7th grade are often working several grade levels below that and need intensive interventions to catch up academically.

The only elementary school with better test scores, Phillips said, was Wilson Elementary. He said he knew parents there wanted the K-8 option, so he would support it at that site. He also said he would like to see a school of the arts in the district, but it’s too early to move in that direction without more analysis of the district’s options.

All three other board members also lambasted Duffy for his attempt to rush this decision through. Board president Stephanie Hernandez-Jarvis said she felt “blindsided” by the proposal, which she called “half-baked.” 

Duffy defended himself, saying the board and community often call for bold changes, but he’s not sure they are really committed to making them. Board members said they’re not against changes, but they need to be thoughtfully considered and well-communicated to allow for wide community input.

Board member Consuelo Lara said she was “shocked” to see this presented as a foregone conclusion. However, she said she didn’t necessarily think it was a bad idea and asked Duffy to present more information at a study session in the future. 

“Sounds good,” Duffy said.

Editor’s Note: As a special project, EdSource is tracking developments this year in the Oakland Unified and West Contra Costa Unified School Districts as a way to illustrate some of the most urgent challenges facing many urban districts in California. West Contra Costa Unified includes Richmond, El Cerrito and several other East Bay communities.

Share Article

Comments (4)

Leave a Reply to Sandra Davenport

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Bridget 2 months ago2 months ago

    The reason why the district is losing enrollment to charter schools and other private schools is because the standards of education in this district are very low. Just because this district is low income does not mean that it has to be treated as such. This district is putting money into programs that are not flourishing; that's the problem right there. There are programs in the district that are not being used and or not … Read More

    The reason why the district is losing enrollment to charter schools and other private schools is because the standards of education in this district are very low. Just because this district is low income does not mean that it has to be treated as such. This district is putting money into programs that are not flourishing; that’s the problem right there. There are programs in the district that are not being used and or not making any type of progress but still getting funding.

    The next thing is the education quality at all schools. The education quality at WCCUSD schools is very low, the expectations for students are low and the rules on how to keep the students in line are at an all-time low. WCCUSD schools are very low, the expectations for students are low and the rules on how to keep the students in line or at all time low. Before making any decisions such as this, take a step back and look where you have failed and what you can improve on before trying to merge everything in K through 8. I feel like that is hurry up fix it with a Band-Aid type of situation.

  2. Sandra Davenport 3 months ago3 months ago

    Making schools K-8 can be a great idea. Many of us parents have wanted that for years. The kids are separated, for one. Many parents pull their kids out of public school at Grade 7 and 8. This inclusion would alleviate that and keep more families in the district. Many of us parents have been wanting this for years.

  3. Jennifer Bestor 3 months ago3 months ago

    West Contra Costa operates at a $28 million disadvantage compared with the rest of the state. Small surprise parents vote with their feet. Twenty years from now, we’ll see exactly how LCFF destroyed public education in the Bay Area. A flat, one-size-fits-all statewide funding model allowed us to expect equivalent outcomes. Underlying regional costs meant we didn’t -- while our implicit biases leapt to blame our favorite demons: individual personalities, demographics, … Read More

    West Contra Costa operates at a $28 million disadvantage compared with the rest of the state. Small surprise parents vote with their feet.

    Twenty years from now, we’ll see exactly how LCFF destroyed public education in the Bay Area. A flat, one-size-fits-all statewide funding model allowed us to expect equivalent outcomes. Underlying regional costs meant we didn’t — while our implicit biases leapt to blame our favorite demons: individual personalities, demographics, unions.

    Ignoring the 9% cost-of-living differential in Contra Costa County is like ignoring a 9 lb. weight in a racehorse’s saddle. We pretend we’ve got identical horses with identical jockeys in a “fair” race. But the horses carrying the hidden extra weight keep breaking down. We blame their jockeys (administrators), their stabling (demographics), their grooms (unions). We point to a few successes, ignoring (or scorning) their enriched oats (parcel taxes and PTA contributions), training (parent commitment), and other factors.

    C’mon, EdSource — you say you’re paying special attention to Oakland and West Contra Costa. Is there a chance you are simply feeding your implicit biases? What would those districts look like if (a) they received 9.4% more LCFF funding and (b) a student’s qualification for economic disadvantage was determined on a family-of-four income of $52,115 rather than the same $47,638 that qualifies disadvantage from El Centro to Yreka?

    Would West Contra Costa’s challenges look the same with an additional $28 million a year of LCFF funding? Because their spending power is $28 million less than equivalent districts elsewhere in California.

    Would Oakland Unified’s struggles be the same ones with $47 million more? Now aggregate this over years and years …

    Charter schools are flourishing in low-income school districts in high-cost counties. Why? Because they can shave costs and, with a 10% haircut, suddenly you’re back in the statewide ballgame. And offloading special education and underutilized, under-maintained facilities is a great start on that 10% shave.

    When Michael Kirst first outlined a more “rational … equitable” school finance structure in 2008, he recognized regional costs as one of the three legs of the stool, along with student disadvantage and special needs. We have a one-legged stool — any wonder it’s tipping over?

  4. Brandon 3 months ago3 months ago

    Why would you want to put little kids on their second or first year of school with kids who aren’t even kids anymore. 7th and 8th graders are to much for a school with little kids who know nothing about bad words because when the big kids come the little kids will know all the bad words because of them.