Photo: Kirby Leevia/AP
General overall view of "School Closed" sign at Macy Intermediate in the wake of the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, in Monterey Park, Calif. The Montebello Unified School District has closed schools from March 16 through May 5.

The unexpected announcement that California schools could resume as early as late July or early August was met with immediate pushback and raised more questions than answers for school districts, teachers and parents.

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s suggestion to reopen schools — aimed at mitigating the learning loss resulting from school closures that began in mid-March in response to the coronavirus pandemic — means some schools would start the school year earlier than usual.

There are concerns that schools will not have enough time and funding to stagger school schedules and create social distancing and related health plans to keep students and staff safe if campuses are reopened in late July or early August.

Reopening schools would be part of the second — and next — of four phases of returning life to normal, Newsom said. He offered no details about how an early start to the school year would work, how it would be paid for or phased in by counties where public health officials would have the final say on conditions for reopening schools. 

Organizations representing school boards and school administrators said their members were caught off guard by Newsom’s announcement, leaving them unprepared for the complaints and questions they received.

“This, by far, generated the biggest reaction of anything the governor has said at his noon press conferences about education,” said Edgar Zazueta, senior director of policy and government relations for the Association of California School Administrators. “People hang on every word the governor says, and though that was not his intent, parents interpreted what he said as a mandate for an early school start, so now we had to respond to a different set of expectations.”

Parent Megan Dawkins, who has students attending Ramona High School and Mountain View Elementary School in the Riverside Unified School District, said she felt uneasy about starting school earlier during the global health crisis. 

“I just don’t see how kids are going to be able to go to school safely with social distancing,” she said. “Classes are already full, and I doubt each room will be disinfected after each class. Even if lunch is had in the room, the kids would still have to go from class to class in high school at least.”

Dawkins said she will consider homeschooling if schools reopen before the “virus is under control,” even if it means her children don’t get the same quality of education.

Districts already had anticipated a difficult reopening of schools, in which they would have to resolve health and safety concerns, social distancing patterns and tricky scheduling for smaller classes. By proposing an early return to school with an unspecified transition period to address students’ learning loss, Newsom potentially sped up the timetable, added the complication of reopening union bargaining with staff and raised the need for additional money to pay for it without indicating a source. 

“Every signal from the Legislature is, ‘You must prepare yourself for cuts.’ How are we going to do this when given an unparalleled task that has never been seen before?” Zazueta said.

The same day that Newsom held his press conference, Palo Alto Unified Superintendent Don Austin was working through several scenarios to push back the opening of school from mid-August to possibly Sept. 8, the day after Labor Day. Nothing that Newsom said has led him to reverse course.

“We were thrust into distance learning, which has been criticized as a lesser substitute for classic instruction, so our thought was to push back the start date with trigger points to keep us from opening virtually if possible,” he said.

Chris Evans, the superintendent of Natomas Unified in Sacramento, agrees that it might be better to reopen schools after Labor Day. Opening early will make it difficult for districts to plan for staggered scheduling, social distancing and transportation to keep students and staff safe, he said.

“We have absolutely been analyzing each of the ideas about how schools should look different when they open and everywhere we turn there is a new challenge,” Evans said. “We are going to be asked to do new and different things with less money. If we are going to stagger kids in a morning or afternoon session, we need to know from the state right away are we going to get instructional-minute waivers?” 

School districts can apply for waivers so that they will not be penalized financially because students were unable to be in school for the amount of time required by the state. The minutes required vary by grade level.

Evans and his staff are considering three options for next school year: distance learning continuing for part of the year; a modified school schedule with split days or students only coming to school a few days a week; or a return to a normal school schedule.

Whatever the district decides will require a lot of planning, Evans said. 

“We need those parameters — the sooner, the better,” he said. “It might be a smarter call to push it to Labor Day.”

Despite that, he understands why the governor is suggesting an early start: “It’s two-fold. He’s worried about the education gap, and to stimulate the economy as people begin to phase back to work. He needs a place for kids to be.”

Erich Myers, a math teacher at Chavez High School and Stockton Unified teachers’ union president, said he is concerned about his students’ social and nutritional needs and would like to see them back in school. But he wouldn’t want students or their teachers to be at risk. He is especially concerned about teachers who are older or who have underlying health problems.

“You shouldn’t have to choose between your job or your health,” he said.

He doesn’t know how the schools in a district with 41,679 students will manage social distancing. Removing just two students from each classroom in Stockton Unified creates the need for about 45 new classrooms, he said: “Where do we find the teachers for these classrooms?”

Opening schools early would require districts to reopen contract negations with teachers unions. Most of the state’s largest school districts are already scheduled to begin their school years in August, with about half opening the first part of the month. Despite that, some districts are considering starting in September because of the coronavirus epidemic.

Claudia Briggs, spokeswoman for the California Teachers Association, said educators have identified safety supports that must take place before opening campuses, including deep cleaning of schools; continuous cleaning of campuses and buses; personal distancing in classes and other shared spaces; and the availability of face masks, gloves, hand sanitizer and other personal protection equipment.

 Schools should have nurses on campuses that can triage students and staff before moving them on to proper health care if they become ill, as well as mental health counselors to support those suffering from the impacts of the pandemic.

“The school closures have been hard on everyone one: our students, our educators, their families, our communities — everyone,” Briggs said. “When they physically return to school campuses we want our students to be safe and ready to learn.”

 In Los Angeles, the teachers union, which would have to agree to an early start, was quick to cast doubt over Newsom’s suggestion.

“These were unfortunate comments. He was getting ahead of himself,” said Alex Caputo-Pearl, president of United Teachers Los Angeles, during a speech Friday morning on Facebook Live.

Caputo-Pearl noted that any proposal for an early start to the school year would require negotiation between the district and the union. “And there has been no conversation about that,” he said. 

“There is not going to be any sort of opening of schools before things are safe. … We are not going to allow anyone to be forced back to work early in unsafe conditions,” he said. 

Thursday afternoon Los Angeles Unified board member Kelly Gonez said the district did not have any plans to open early in an emailed newsletter. 

“We are exploring all options to ensure that students and staff can return to school safely and engage in learning that will support their academic growth and socio-emotional well-being,” she said.

School district officials say they are waiting for more guidance from the state before altering school schedules.

“Until we know what kind of guidance we receive to make sure our students and staff are going to be healthy, that will play a huge role in what we can do,” said Xanthi Pinkerton, spokeswoman for Elk Grove Unified, which serves 64,000 students in Sacramento County.

The district has set up a task force of district employees to create a social distancing plan for its schools. Like most districts, one of those scenarios includes continuing distance learning if necessary.

It already has 18 of its 61 schools on a year-round schedule, with students at those schools scheduled to start July 16.

“The governor’s consideration of an earlier start date for schools is new information to us,” Chris Eftychiou, spokesman for Long Beach Unified, said. “There’s no firm decision yet, so we’ll continue to monitor the state’s guidance.”

Both San Francisco Unified and Oakland Unified officials said they are working with public health officials to determine when school will reopen. If schools were to reopen early, it would have to be a joint decision between the district and its unions, said San Francisco Unified superintendent Vincent Matthews.

Oakland Unified officials said they have considered possible scenarios to re-open campuses in the fall, but need more guidance from the California Department of Education — especially regarding a likely timeline — before moving ahead with any plans, district spokesman John Sasaki said. 

 Even if schools manage the monumental task of reopening schools early, parents will have to be convinced.

“I’m not sure parents will be ready to send children back into the petri dish that is public school,” said Caryn Cherry, who has children at Beacon Park K-8 and Portola High School in Irvine Unified School District. “No one knows what ‘school’ will look like in July, with current health restrictions, so start there. My preference is that more time and effort is invested in innovating public education in preparation for the next waves of the virus.”

EdSource reporters Michael Burke and Ali Taydon contributed to this report.

Share Article

Comments (11)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. John Kardol 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    We all want to go back, but can we really? There are not enough teachers and substitutes. Normally most teachers go to work with mild cold symptoms. But we will be required to stay home if we experience - fever of 100.5 F, cough, trouble breathing, shortness of breath or severe wheezing, muscle aches, sore throat, loss of smell or taste, or a change in taste, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea, headache. A lot … Read More

    We all want to go back, but can we really? There are not enough teachers and substitutes. Normally most teachers go to work with mild cold symptoms. But we will be required to stay home if we experience – fever of 100.5 F, cough, trouble breathing, shortness of breath or severe wheezing, muscle aches, sore throat, loss of smell or taste, or a change in taste, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea, headache.

    A lot of teachers will be calling is sick. No substitute to replace. No classes to take extra students. Classes will be forced to cancel. Leaving parents to scramble.

  2. Stephen Raynor 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

    Plano TX has 51,000 students in PISD, two thirds in top 25% income bracket and perhaps one third in bottom 25% bracket. No live distance learning. 10% are Spanish only speakers, without access. The district has some very smart leaders; however they are politicians 1st; for example team sports for '20-21 need to be scrapped but no politician in a Texas will step up like California has and say, it’s too risky. Period. My son is outstanding … Read More

    Plano TX has 51,000 students in PISD, two thirds in top 25% income bracket and perhaps one third in bottom 25% bracket. No live distance learning. 10% are Spanish only speakers, without access.

    The district has some very smart leaders; however they are politicians 1st; for example team sports for ’20-21 need to be scrapped but no politician in a Texas will step up like California has and say, it’s too risky. Period.
    My son is outstanding in team sports but, either all teachers take a 20% cut or cut PE What is distance PE anyway?

    Use gyms for distance learning.

    I think elementary teachers must have in class room learning half-day, half-sized classes. Distance learning for kindergarten? What a waste.

    Now if you get core activity mixed with play and perhaps 1 hour pm of distance after lunch and nap perhaps that might reinforce hands-on learning up through grade 2.

  3. Cassie 4 weeks ago4 weeks ago

    This is a waste of time and money. There is no way to prevent the virus from circulating once we come out of the house. Best to let it circulate over summer, protect the vulnerable as we know exactly who they are and have a better chance for herd immunity in late August early September. That is the only way to move forward!!

    https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/35678-expert-testimony-before-senate-contradicts-medias-covid-19-narrative#
    https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/covid-19-how-new-information-should-drive-policy

    Replies

    • Steve 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago

      Herd immunity may require up to 90% of Americans to get this before it works. However 1/3 to 50% of Americans have 1 or more underlying conditions which means hospitalization and/or death for 2 or 3 million of us if we ignore 6 ft and mask requirements. If herd immunity is such a great idea, why didn’t doctors 100 years ago deliberately give everyone smallpox like colonists gave Indian tribes blankets with smallpox? Those tribes … Read More

      Herd immunity may require up to 90% of Americans to get this before it works. However 1/3 to 50% of Americans have 1 or more underlying conditions which means hospitalization and/or death for 2 or 3 million of us if we ignore 6 ft and mask requirements.

      If herd immunity is such a great idea, why didn’t doctors 100 years ago deliberately give everyone smallpox like colonists gave Indian tribes blankets with smallpox? Those tribes lost up to 90% of their people.

      Greece and Japan have had success, because if they say wear a mask, people wear a mask. Greece the birthplace of warriors and thinkers, and they get it. Their govt and economy are horrible but they get the mask deal. They get restrictions.

      Our military has all kinds of restrictions. Now unfortunately and briefly so do we.Or move to Hawaii where there is only 1 death so far.

      Sweden which has much better health care at cheaper prices since they went for herd immunity, still is having problems as in people dying or hogging up beds that displace cancer surgeries which in the U.S. are deemed elective right now.

  4. Berteaux 4 weeks ago4 weeks ago

    Thank you for your article! I am a teacher being asked to help my elementary school site put "safety measures" in place of reopening in August. I am curious what this looks like. We are a TK-5 school. How do we separate our students and keep a clean environment in the hallways, bathrooms, playground equipment, on buses, in cafeterias, etc., as well as safely teach inside our classrooms? This is the making of a huge … Read More

    Thank you for your article! I am a teacher being asked to help my elementary school site put “safety measures” in place of reopening in August. I am curious what this looks like. We are a TK-5 school. How do we separate our students and keep a clean environment in the hallways, bathrooms, playground equipment, on buses, in cafeterias, etc., as well as safely teach inside our classrooms? This is the making of a huge paradigm shift in education. I would like to know what other districts are doing and how they are implementing their plans. Also, if the state or federal government is going to fund more before- and after-school daycare if we have split days.

  5. Alicia 4 weeks ago4 weeks ago

    In San Diego county we have several districts that have various year-round school calendars. My school does not end until July 21. That is why we had a 4 week break in April. Our students missed the same two weeks in March as schools on traditional track. So what happens to their school year? Certain staff members such as Special Ed members work 1:1 and in small groups in extremely close contact. Often … Read More

    In San Diego county we have several districts that have various year-round school calendars. My school does not end until July 21. That is why we had a 4 week break in April. Our students missed the same two weeks in March as schools on traditional track. So what happens to their school year?
    Certain staff members such as Special Ed members work 1:1 and in small groups in extremely close contact. Often it’s the most appropriate way to meet their needs.

    While it’s true that the death rate for the those over 60 is highest, data for San Diego County shows the 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 age groups have the highest number of cases. That means that most teachers will get it, recover in a couple of weeks, and spread it. It has come to light that children are asymptomatic while having coronavirus. That means children will get, still go to school, and spread it. Those over 60 will be susceptible to getting seriously ill or dying. No teacher or student should deal with having infected someone else.

    Regardless of when schools open, numerous safety measures need to be in place. Those adults that get and recover easily could be left numerous health issues. Children may get other virus related illnesses.

    The safety of our school personnel and children needs to be primary in any plan.

  6. Dan Terranova 1 month ago1 month ago

    It is in everyone’s interest in making the schools safe. If safety measures aren’t enforced, the kids are going to bring it home to their families, which are often multi-generational. As for teachers, they are going to be seen as likely sources of viral spreading among their social contacts.

  7. R. Sandoval 1 month ago1 month ago

    I'm overly concerned that returning to opening our schools sooner than later may cause a second wave of the Covid 19. In my heart I worry that our students and my children and the staff will suffer devastating consequences. While I understand the agonizing "stay-at-home" safety measures that has taken a toll on all of us, studies show that we are indeed safer at home. I don't want to worry each day … Read More

    I’m overly concerned that returning to opening our schools sooner than later may cause a second wave of the Covid 19. In my heart I worry that our students and my children and the staff will suffer devastating consequences. While I understand the agonizing “stay-at-home” safety measures that has taken a toll on all of us, studies show that we are indeed safer at home. I don’t want to worry each day that Covid 19 will hit my home and lose a loved one.

    We don’t believe it can happen to us until we have a family member that has contracted the virus. My brother-in-law was hospitalized for about a month and released to a hotel stay for quarantine. Soon after, that he developed a fever again. He is said to be is better now, but he is scarred for the rest of his life. Believe it! It is a real pandemic! As a parent and a staff member at a school, it scares me to think that we will lose more precious lives!

    My purpose for sharing this post, is not to put fear in our community, but to share that many people still do not believe that it could happen. We are not immune to this deadly virus! God help us all!

  8. Frances O'Neill Zimmerman 1 month ago1 month ago

    Teacher unions' revised contracts are central to whether, when and how public education will resume in the Fall. We need to know much more about them. A perfect example is San Diego Unified School District, second largest in California, with 103,000 students. Many districts around the state maintained teacher-student contact and improvised continuing instruction for kids from the beginning of pandemic closure on March 16, 2020. Not so in San Diego, where mandated instruction was … Read More

    Teacher unions’ revised contracts are central to whether, when and how public education will resume in the Fall. We need to know much more about them.

    A perfect example is San Diego Unified School District, second largest in California, with 103,000 students. Many districts around the state maintained teacher-student contact and improvised continuing instruction for kids from the beginning of pandemic closure on March 16, 2020.

    Not so in San Diego, where mandated instruction was quietly suspended for six weeks, resuming online only last week, April 27. During this hiatus, the district re-negotiated terms of its labor contract with the San Diego Education Association union, but the terms have not been made public.

    Maybe EdSource can tell us more. Doubtless that information will shed light on what lies ahead in the new academic year.

    Replies

    • Dan Plonsey 1 month ago1 month ago

      Public school contracts are publicly available; I'm not sure if you mean to imply that they aren't. Are you looking for this: http://www.sdea.net/wp-content/uploads/SDEA-COVID-19-Impacts-and-Effects-May-Post-and-Bid.pdf from 4/10? Or is there a more recent MOU, not yet published? In any case, the real issue is whether the state can come up with the funding to operate schools safely, because there's no controversy about the need to keep students, teachers, staff, and parents as safe as possible. Funding would have … Read More

      Public school contracts are publicly available; I’m not sure if you mean to imply that they aren’t. Are you looking for this: http://www.sdea.net/wp-content/uploads/SDEA-COVID-19-Impacts-and-Effects-May-Post-and-Bid.pdf
      from 4/10? Or is there a more recent MOU, not yet published? In any case, the real issue is whether the state can come up with the funding to operate schools safely, because there’s no controversy about the need to keep students, teachers, staff, and parents as safe as possible. Funding would have to come from large tax increases, which would have to come from the wealthiest in CA, as the rest of us have lost – or will lose – income and savings. Those who want to see schools reopen (pretty much everyone, I believe) will need to begin to work to convince the governor and Legislature that they need to start talking about raising taxes ASAP, otherwise it won’t happen, because if what you’re asking is: Will teachers agree to pay cuts and layoffs? The answer is a definite no.

  9. Christopher Chiang 1 month ago1 month ago

    I think schools would only open in July if COVID-19 dramatically dropped in the summer, and in that case (it would be worth considering), perhaps summer school (with teachers that opt-in as summer has always been) or if an early start of the year, then an early end (given that December can be a second peak, as it did in with the 1918 Flu). If- and only if – July is nearly COVID-19 free, I'd … Read More

    I think schools would only open in July if COVID-19 dramatically dropped in the summer, and in that case (it would be worth considering), perhaps summer school (with teachers that opt-in as summer has always been) or if an early start of the year, then an early end (given that December can be a second peak, as it did in with the 1918 Flu). If- and only if – July is nearly COVID-19 free, I’d then rather teach July, than banking on a safer December.