Photo: Julie Leopo/EdSource

For more than a century, Californians invested in a public higher education system that was the envy of the world.

Dick Ackerman

But in the subsequent decades, economic pressures led to declining investments in this system.

In 2008, as the state’s economy plummeted and the nation entered the Great Recession, California’s investments in public higher education nosedived, causing a backlog of deferred maintenance at the University of California, California State University and community colleges.

Today, many students attend classes in buildings in need of seismic upgrades. They often work with outdated equipment and sometimes cannot get the courses they need to graduate because of the lack of available classroom space. 

Across the state, millions of younger students attend classes in rundown, obsolete, unsafe and unhealthy facilities, which can harm their education and their health.

Mel Levine

Californians will have an opportunity to protect the health and safety of the state’s students by voting in favor of a bond measure on the March 3 ballot. 

Prop. 13 would provide $15 billion to upgrade and expand public school systems serving students from preschool through college graduation — with the priority placed on fixing earthquake, fire and other life-safety issues.

The Secretary of State gave the California Public Preschool, Kindergarten-12 and College Health and Safety Bond the same number as a more famous tax measure. But the 2020 version of Prop. 13 differs substantially: It is the strongest statewide school bond measure in California history.

 The bond measure would provide $6 billion to be divided equally among UC, CSU and community colleges.

Another $9 billion would go to preK-12 schools to replace unsafe drinking water systems, repair dilapidated classrooms, remove mold and asbestos and make many other needed repairs to ensure the schools are safe.

An additional $100 million would be available to update and improve California’s charter and technical schools, including those that train veterans returning from duty.

The bond measure includes robust taxpayer accountability measures that strictly limit administrative costs and mandate independent performance audits of any project it funds. Public hearings would be conducted to ensure public input, and campuses would be required to develop five-year plans to create more affordable student housing.

Because rundown buildings are most often found in low-wealth school districts, the proposition includes key reforms to ensure equitable school facilities spending by investing in districts that most need the funds.

This important bond measure won nearly unanimous bipartisan support in the state Legislature and has continued to draw bipartisan support, including from our organization of California public higher education system alumni.

The proposition also has the support of a broad-based coalition of teachers, doctors, nurses, firefighters, business leaders and military veterans. 

Prop. 13 would be the first bond measure since 2006 to provide significant money for higher education infrastructure. Investing in the higher public education infrastructure is not an option for California — it is a necessity.

As the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) noted, the retirement of the Baby Boomers represents the first time in California’s history that such a large and well-educated generation is exiting the labor force. 

Their exodus from the workforce is the main reason the PPIC said the state will need 1.1 million more graduates with bachelor’s degrees in the next 10 years than are expected to graduate now. But meeting employers’ demand for educated workers will be challenging in California’s aging public higher education systems.

Nearly 60 percent of the UC’s public buildings are more than 30 years old, with 42 percent of that space built between 1950 and 1980. In CSU, half the space is 40 years or older, and a third is more than 50 years old.

By voting yes on Prop. 13, Californians can ensure that the state makes the needed investments to update outdated buildings and technology and to make seismic and other life-safety improvements that are critical to the health and safety of our state’s young people.

They can also be certain that California will again be making meaningful investments in the infrastructure needed for a world-class public higher education system. A yes vote on Prop 13 is a vote for a better future for our children and our state.

•••

Dick Ackerman is a former California state senator and assembly member from Orange County. Mel Levine is a former U.S. Congressman and state assembly member from Los Angeles. They co-chair the California Coalition for Public Higher Education, which advocates for more investment in higher education.

The opinions in this commentary are those of the author.  It is one of a series of commentaries EdSource is publishing expressing a range of views on the school bond measure on the March 3 ballot. As a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization EdSource takes no position on the ballot measure. Read other perspectives here.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (1)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. el 7 months ago7 months ago

    Often the word "rundown" is used in this context, but I think it's important to recognize that this investment is needed even when the buildings have been well-maintained and are in good shape as buildings. The world has changed in the 40-50 years even since the 1970s and 1980s - which feels "modern" to many of us adults - and classrooms need much more access to electrical outlets, to higher capacity electrical circuits, better ventilation, … Read More

    Often the word “rundown” is used in this context, but I think it’s important to recognize that this investment is needed even when the buildings have been well-maintained and are in good shape as buildings. The world has changed in the 40-50 years even since the 1970s and 1980s – which feels “modern” to many of us adults – and classrooms need much more access to electrical outlets, to higher capacity electrical circuits, better ventilation, more effective heating and cooling, and the like. The plumbing also may need to be redone, as well as the blacktop, and those buildings generally don’t meet current expectations for ADA accessibility. To make any of the changes that may be needed to bring buildings into a modern era may trigger the need for ADA remodeling, making even small projects completely inaccessible to many districts without specific bond funding.

    Creating more available and more affordable student housing around our universities is also I think key to making and keeping our colleges accessible. Tuition is often paid for by grants, but the housing costs are not and they’re more than tuition. Nearly every public university seems to have a shortage of on-campus housing.