Photo: Andrew Reed/EdSource
Oakland Unified Superintendent Kyla Johnson-Trammell chats with students at the newly expanded Coliseum College Preparatory Academy on the first day of school Aug. 12, 2019.

Amid school closures due to the coronavirus, the Oakland Unified school board on Wednesday unanimously approved a contract extension for Superintendent Kyla Johnson-Trammell through June 2023.

If she remains in her position through the end of the contract, Johnson-Trammell would become one of the district’s longest-tenured superintendents in years.

“Thank you for allowing me to be of service, even during all of these tumultuous times,” said Johnson-Trammell, an Oakland native who has spent her entire professional career in the district and who has been in her post for almost three years. “It is indeed my pleasure to be of service to the community that’s raised me.”

During her short tenure so far, she has to had grapple with severe financial problems, a week-long teachers’ strike, and now a pandemic that has left all the district’s students at home trying to learn remotely — in many cases without devices or internet access.

“The number one action we can take to ensure the success of this school district is continuity in leadership, starting with the superintendent,” said board president Jody London, who has served on the board for 12 years. “She is smart, compassionate, and committed to improving educational opportunities and outcomes for all students in our city. I am delighted that she will continue as superintendent.”

The school board appointed Johnson-Trammell to her position July 1, 2017 to replace Antwan Wilson, who left to head the Washington, D.C. schools after only 2 1/2 years in Oakland. Johnson-Trammell attended district schools and has worked in Oakland Unified as a teacher, principal and district administrator before becoming superintendent.

Although Johnson-Trammell’s contract was not set to expire until June 30, 2021, the seven-member board acted on it a year ahead of time. The terms of four board members, who have said they do not intend to run for re-election, will expire this year.

The new contract boosts Johnson-Trammell’s pay to $280,000 a year, with fringe benefits including “longevity pay” and health and retirement contributions of nearly $80,000, bringing the total value of her compensation to just under $360,000. Board members thanked Johnson-Trammell for agreeing to continue leading the district through the coronavirus pandemic and into the future.

Courtesy of Oakland Unified

The Oakland Unified school board approved a contract for new CBO Lisa Grant-Dawson on April 22, 2020.

The board also approved a contract for a new chief business officer, Lisa Grant-Dawson, through June 30, 2022.  She has a base annual salary of $247,200, plus benefits including health, vision and dental insurance of about $36,154, bringing the total value of her compensation to $283,584. Grant-Dawson previously worked in Stockton Unified as its chief business officer, and was a chief business officer at Vallejo City Unified, which has also had financial troubles.

Over the past two decades, Oakland has had 10 school chiefs, which includes three interim superintendents who served while the district looked for a permanent superintendent, and three appointed by the state. None of them stayed longer than four years in the district, which has struggled to stay afloat financially. It has also faced strong criticism from many teachers and community members who have objected to several school closings, and the expansion of charter schools citywide. Teachers in the district went on a strike for seven days last year, which ended after the district agreed to pay raises, as well as an expansion of a range of support services for students, among other demands.

During the past year, Johnson-Trammell faced criticism after district police used batons to keep anti-school closure protesters from disrupting a meeting, which sparked a lawsuit and calls for the district to eliminate its police force. Johnson-Trammell has agreed to bring a safety plan to the board in the fall so it can consider alternatives to district police.

The district’s overspending and lack of fiscal controls over a period of many years have been criticized by an Alameda County Civil Grand Jury and by the Fiscal Crisis Management and Assistance Team, or FCMAT, an agency that helps districts in fiscal distress. Many of these issues stemmed from before Johnson-Trammell became superintendent.

While Johnson-Trammell has provided leadership continuity over the past three years, the district has suffered from a lack of stability in its fiscal department. Marcus Battle, the previous chief business officer left last year and the chief financial officer resigned a month later. 

To help address its financial problems and fill the void left by the loss of its two fiscal leaders, last July the district brought in interim chief financial officer Luz Cazares. With Grant-Dawson coming on board, Cazares is expected to work through June 30 “to help with the transition,“ according to the district. The district does not intend to hire a permanent CFO.

District resident Carol Delton, who routinely questions fiscal issues and board decisions, made a plea directly to Grant-Dawson during the Zoom meeting. “Please help this board and district make better financial decisions,” she said.

Grant-Dawson said she heard the concerns expressed by community members. She said she would help the district develop fiscal strategies so that “people are no longer talking about Oakland in a negative manner and this community can stand strong and be very comfortable and confident in what we’re building together.”

Editor’s Note: As a special project, EdSource is tracking developments in the Oakland Unified and West Contra Costa Unified School Districts as a way to illustrate some of the challenges facing other urban districts in California. West Contra Costa Unified includes Richmond, El Cerrito and several other East Bay communities.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (2)

Leave a Reply to Livermore Parents

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Livermore Parents 1 year ago1 year ago

    Oakland School Superintendent Base: $247,200, Benefits: $36,154. Total: $283,584. And on the other side of Alameda County, Livermore Superintendent Kelly Bowers made $315,510.96 base, and with benefits and other pay it totaled to $410,433.71 a year in taxpayer burden – and this was for 2017. And Livermore schools are the lowest performing in the Tri-Valley.

    Wish Livermore was as frugal as Oakland.

  2. Todd Maddison 1 year ago1 year ago

    Regrettable that no contract modifications were made to tie the increased pay to increased performance. Her overall pay is not out of line with what one might see in the CEO of a comparably-sized private business (perhaps even a bit low), but on the private CEO would have a considerable portion of that pay dependent on meeting performance goals, not just "warming the seat" for a given amount of time. Imagine if her extra pay came in … Read More

    Regrettable that no contract modifications were made to tie the increased pay to increased performance.

    Her overall pay is not out of line with what one might see in the CEO of a comparably-sized private business (perhaps even a bit low), but on the private CEO would have a considerable portion of that pay dependent on meeting performance goals, not just “warming the seat” for a given amount of time.

    Imagine if her extra pay came in the form of a bonus program structured to pay out if she moved the district up a notch on the CA School Dashboard, or brought in the budget on time and balanced, or any of the objective metrics that are out there.

    In private business, that’s what’s called “aligning the employee interests with the organization’s interests,” which, in this case, would be the parents’ interests.

    But this is education, so simply paying people for being there is what we do. And we wonder why we don’t see improvement?