Photo: Alison Yin/EdSource
The rate of African-American student suspensions has fallen dramatically over the past decade.

After nearly a decade of school discipline reform in California, the suspension rate for African-American students continued to decline last year, according to recently released state data.

The statewide suspension rate was 3.5 percent in 2018-19, the same as the year before, but the suspension rate among black students fell from 9.4 percent to 9.1 percent, a drop of more than 3,500 suspensions, according to the California Department of Education. Among Latino students the rate remained the same, 3.6 percent.

The numbers suggest that a years-long push by discipline reform advocates, educators and the state toward restorative justice and positive behavior interventions may be working, experts said.

In 2013, the state banned suspensions for willful defiance, defined as defying teachers’ authority or disrupting school activities, in grades K-3 because the suspensions were disproportionately applied to students of color and were thought to be ineffective in improving behavior. Last year Gov. Newsom expanded the ban to K-8 grades. Meanwhile, in 2013, Los Angeles Unified banned willful defiance suspensions for all grades.

Reform efforts were aimed at improving outcomes for students, especially those of color, who are more likely to end up in prison as adults if they were suspended in school, according to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union. Instead of being sent home, students would see counselors or social workers on campus, who would help address the underlying cause of the student’s misbehavior. Schools across the state have hired more counselors and implemented programs such as restorative justice to improve student behavior and campus climate overall.

In 2011-12, when those efforts were just getting underway, California’s suspension rate was 5.8 percent and 13.8 percent for African-American students. In all, California students were suspended more than 700,000 times that year.

“I think there’s now a general understanding that change (to the discipline system) needed to happen,” said Daniel Losen, director of the Center for Civil Rights Remedies at UCLA, which has researched school discipline around the country. “Districts are starting to realize that keeping kids in school makes more sense, financially and otherwise, both in the short term and long term.”

Some of the state’s lowest suspension rates were in urban districts that have invested in counseling and staff training to improve school climate. Los Angeles Unified, which banned willful defiance suspensions six years ago and implemented a host of counseling and restorative justice programs, continued to see its numbers drop across all suspension categories, including fighting, selling drugs and bringing weapons to school. The district’s overall suspension rate was just 0.7 percent last school year.

San Francisco Unified logged a rate of 1.9 percent.

“We strongly believe that students belong in school,” said San Francisco Unified spokeswoman Laura Dudnick. “We focus on restorative practices, positive behavior interventions and supports, and trauma-sensitive practices. Per board policy, suspension is a last resort and often only utilized when legally mandated,” such as when a student sells drugs on campus or brings a firearm to school.

Orange County saw a drop from 4.3 percent in 2011-12 to 2.2 percent last year, which Superintendent Al Mijares attributed to a strong push by the county’s 28 districts to improve school climate overall. He also credited changes in state policies: the ban on willful defiance suspensions in lower grades; the California School Dashboard, which includes suspension rates as a measure of a school’s success; and the Local Control and Accountability Plan, a state-required roadmap for district priorities and spending.

“The LCAP forced us to create metrics and then hit our metrics,” he said. “We’re happy because these numbers show the fruit of our labor. It shows there’s an intelligent way to approach behavior in the classroom, and it works.”

Districts in Orange County have used their LCAP funding to hire more counselors, psychologists and social workers, train teachers and after-school staff on restorative practices and take other steps to improve student behavior.

“I think we’ve learned that social-emotional learning is mandatory. If a student is disrupting class, kicking them out on the street is not the answer,” Mijares said. “There’s a lot more awareness by everyone who works in schools that when kids are having problems, we have to help them.”

Discipline improved at many rural districts, as well. One of the steepest declines in the state was at the Allensworth Elementary School District, south of Visalia in Tulare County, which saw its suspension rate decline from 7.3 percent to 2 percent over the past year. Even though the drop represents a small number of students, it is significant for the 85-student, K-8 district, said Superintendent Max Friedman.

The school staff has been focusing on school climate for several years, he said. Instead of suspensions, students are sent to detention after school, before school or at lunch, where they work on homework and talk to school staff about whatever problems they may be experiencing.

The school also offers rewards for good behavior, such as pizza parties and class field trips to the pumpkin patch or Fresno State University football games, Friedman said. The staff also meets regularly with parents, nearly all of whom are low-income farm workers whose primary language is Spanish. That’s helped create an atmosphere of trust, he said.

The efforts have also had a positive impact on attendance. Allensworth had a chronic absenteeism rate of just 4.4 percent last year, about a third of the statewide rate and 18.1 percentage points lower than the district’s rate the previous year.

“Our teachers have done an outstanding job at making our kids feel safe. We’ve all worked hard on this and it’s starting to pay off,” Friedman said. “Kids need to feel safe to learn.”

While the latest statewide discipline figures show improvement, they don’t tell the whole story of campus climate in California schools, Losen said. The data doesn’t show the frequency or duration of suspensions, or the number of on-campus arrests. He also noted that some districts might be overstating their investments in alternative discipline measures, such as restorative justice, and underreporting their suspensions. A recent study he worked on showed that 18 percent of charter schools nationwide didn’t accurately report their suspensions.

But for the most part, he believes the most recent discipline data in California is accurate and reflects a genuine improvement in classroom behavior.

“By and large, the numbers are reliable in California,” Losen said. “There’s a lot of groups holding districts’ feet to the fire, making sure these numbers are right.…And California is one of the few states that’s made discipline a measure of school accountability. California deserves some credit for that.”

Share Article

Comments (7)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Mary Johnson 3 months ago3 months ago

    I disagree with this article. Black students' suspension rate isn't on the decline, Dr. Pedro Noguera and Dr. Tyrone Howard of UCLA Transformation Center For School Reform just published data on this issue. Black students need to be identified and not talked about under a larger group as disadvantaged students. I am a little disappointed by Tony Thurmond because his experts are always teachers, and professors; he needs some grassroots parents and community leaders from … Read More

    I disagree with this article. Black students’ suspension rate isn’t on the decline, Dr. Pedro Noguera and Dr. Tyrone Howard of UCLA Transformation Center For School Reform just published data on this issue.

    Black students need to be identified and not talked about under a larger group as disadvantaged students. I am a little disappointed by Tony Thurmond because his experts are always teachers, and professors; he needs some grassroots parents and community leaders from struggling schools on these committees.

    LCFF benefits many students with extra resources and services such as English Learners, Foster Care, and Homeless, but the black students who struggle and lag behind in every category are swept under as disadvantaged students. Black students should be the State of California’s priority to bridge the opportunity gap and achievement gap.

    I want to know in what city is black suspension is greatly declining. They just don’t send students home –– they have in-house suspension. Until the law is changed that teachers can suspend a child from their classroom, things will remain the status quo. The suspension rate is hidden by in-house suspensions, they just do not send students home. They sit in a room sleeping and talking to friends without quality curriculum instruction being learned.

  2. Louis 3 months ago3 months ago

    Is anyone really shocked that suspensions are down after they were banned? The cognitive dissonance on display is incredible.

    This is like the Prop 47 supporters celebrating crime being down when shoplifters aren’t arrested anymore.

  3. Bruce 3 months ago3 months ago

    Glad I am not alone in skepticism that fewer suspensions equals better discipline or school climate. Sure would be interesting to hear a classroom-level perspective on this.

    Are some good things happening around supporting disruptive kids’ needs? Sure. But is that the norm? Or are lots of teachers just being told to deal with the problem in their class with no new resources? What do the other 25 kids think?

  4. Educator 3 months ago3 months ago

    As an educator, I can tell you for a fact many students misbehave, they are just not being officially suspended. Because of this, the numbers for suspensions are misleading.

    Just because something is no longer a crime, doesn’t mean your neighborhood is safer.

  5. Dominic Zarecki 3 months ago3 months ago

    It’s great that suspension rates have declined. That said, I wish we used research to be strategic about how we reduce suspensions. In November, my research won the Outstanding Paper award from the California Educational Research Association. Banning willful defiance in grades K-12 appears to have had very negative academic consequences: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3251581

  6. James P. Scanlan 3 months ago3 months ago

    The discipline reforms discussed here are premised on the belief that reducing suspensions will tend to reduce the ratio of the black rate to the white rate. In fact, the opposite is the case, as I have explained in the editorial below and many other places. http://gunpowdergazette.com/2019/12/16/op-ed-maryland-discipline-study-shows-usual-but-misunderstood-effects-of-policies-on-measures-of-racial-disparity/ That the black rate declined between the 2017-18 year and the 2018-19 year while the overall rate remained constant indicates that the ratio of the black rate to … Read More

    The discipline reforms discussed here are premised on the belief that reducing suspensions will tend to reduce the ratio of the black rate to the white rate. In fact, the opposite is the case, as I have explained in the editorial below and many other places. http://gunpowdergazette.com/2019/12/16/op-ed-maryland-discipline-study-shows-usual-but-misunderstood-effects-of-policies-on-measures-of-racial-disparity/

    That the black rate declined between the 2017-18 year and the 2018-19 year while the overall rate remained constant indicates that the ratio of the black rate to the overall rate declined. The ratio of the black rate to the white rate may well have also declined. This would be a departure from the usual pattern over this one-year period.

    But that article also shows that for entire 2011-12 to 2018-19 period, the ratio of the black rate to the white rate increased from 2.88 to (13.8%/5.8%) to 3.03 (9.1%/3.0%). The data also show that for entire period the ratio of the black rate to the overall rated increased from 2.33 (13.8%/5.8%) to 2.60 (9.1%/3.5%). Typically, data for the longer period provide more useful information about the consequences of policies than data for shorter period.

  7. Jim 3 months ago3 months ago

    This article definitely has an Alice In Wonderland quality to it. "the most recent discipline data in California is accurate and reflects a genuine improvement in classroom behavior." How does lower suspension rates indicate anything about classroom "climate? San Francisco no longer prosecutes petty theft such as shoplifting or auto break-ins. People no longer report them because they know nothing will happen. Based on that you could say petty theft is down in SF. We … Read More

    This article definitely has an Alice In Wonderland quality to it. “the most recent discipline data in California is accurate and reflects a genuine improvement in classroom behavior.” How does lower suspension rates indicate anything about classroom “climate?

    San Francisco no longer prosecutes petty theft such as shoplifting or auto break-ins. People no longer report them because they know nothing will happen. Based on that you could say petty theft is down in SF. We all know that petty theft is skyrocketing in SF but of course if you only look at arrests then you have no idea of the situation on the ground. Looks like wait lists for charter schools will rise again.