Larry Gordon/EdSource
Cal State Northridge is one of 23 CSU System institutions.

Ending a decades-long connection, the association representing California State University faculty has severed its ties with the California Teachers Association, resulting in a significant loss in membership for the state’s largest teachers union.

In a little noticed move, the board of the California Faculty Association voted in late May to “disaffiliate” from the CTA. The association, whose members include faculty, part-time lecturers, librarians, counselors and coaches on the 23 CSU campuses, is an affiliate of the CTA, which means that its members can be CTA members as well.

The CTA wields considerable clout educationally and politically the state. Defying predictions that the Janus ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court a year ago would eviscerate public employee unions by limiting the fees they could collect, the CTA says it has added new members, as have many other unions across the country. The CTA anticipates that some 22,000 new members it says it has recruited over the past year will offset the approximately 19,000 CSU staff the CTA says belonged to both the faculty association and the CTA.  The CTA says  its overall membership will remain around 325,000.

The severing of the ties between the two organizations comes at a time of some turbulence in the CTA’s leadership. In March, the CTA elected E. Toby Boyd as its new president, in an upset victory over Theresa Montaño, a CSU professor who was the CTA’s vice president and a member of the faculty association. At  the time, Boyd was a member of the CTA’s board of directors. Then in July, in an abrupt and unexpected move, the CTA’s board terminated its executive director Joe Nuñez, a CTA veteran who was responsible for the organization’s day-to-day operations.

In a letter addressed “to whom it may concern” at the CTA, Charles Toombs, the CSU faculty association’s president, said the decision to disaffiliate was made following a review of the contract between the two organizations that “has taken place over the last several years” and to “optimize the association’s resources, members and operations.”  The faculty association also ended its ties to the National Education Association, of which the CTA is a state affiliate. Toombs, a professor of Africana Studies at San Diego State University, did not provide any further details in his letter to the CTA.

In a statement provided to EdSource, the faculty association said it “continues to support public K-12 teachers in California and nationwide and will fight alongside them for educational justice.” It said it remains “deeply committed to working families and strongly affiliated with organizations that protect and defend all public education.”

Despite the rupture, CTA president Boyd said in a memo to members of his organization’s State Council, made up of nearly 800 members, that he had recently met with Coombs and “looked forward to finding common ground with CFA as labor representatives of education workers.” Leaders of both organizations declined to be interviewed about what led to the disaffiliation.

The CTA is best known for representing K-12 teachers and they are its major focus. The California Faculty Association was one of two higher education unions that were affiliated with the CTA. The other is the Community College Association, which represents several thousand community college faculty and staff. It is still affiliated with the CTA.

The affiliation with these postsecondary organizations has meant that staff belonging to these higher education associations were also CTA members. They were also eligible to participate in a number of CTA benefits and discount programs. A small portion of their union dues have gone to the CTA.

Insiders say that a number of issues related to dues and representation on governing bodies within the CTA had created some friction with the faculty association. But they say the failure to elect Montaño, a longtime faculty association representative, as CTA president was the final irritant.

As vice president, Montaño was in line to succeed outgoing president Eric Heins. Instead, Heins strongly backed Boyd, a kindergarten teacher in Elk Grove Unified near Sacramento, at the meeting of the CTA’s State Council in March.

Montaño, a former teacher and staffer with United Teachers Los Angeles, had deep roots in the CTA and has been a professor of Chicano Studies at Cal State Northridge for many years. As a result of her defeat, she is no longer a member of the CTA.

Montaño’s departure and subsequent fallout may also have been a factor in the termination of  CTA’s executive director Nuñez. The decision to terminate Nuñez took many educators in and outside the union by surprise.  The board that voted to oust Nuñez included several newly elected board members who were attending their first meeting. On the board are David Goldberg, a veteran Los Angeles Unified teacher who was elected vice president in March, and Leslie Littman, another veteran teacher from William S. Hart School District in Santa Clarita, who was elected CTA’s secretary-treasurer. Both ran on the same “Building Power Together” slate as Montaño.

Montaño declined to comment on the election of Boyd or on the CSU faculty association’s decision to leave the CTA.

The CTA has a special seat on its board of directors for a board member to represent both CSU and community college members. Boyd in his memo to the State Council noted that as a result of the faculty association’s decision Chico State history professor Susan Green had to vacate that seat.

For now, her departure means that the community colleges are not represented on the board. In a message on the Community College Association’s website, Eric Kaljumagi, the association’s president and a math professor at Mt. San Antonio College in the San Gabriel Valley, said he had met recently with CTA president Boyd about the matter.

Kaljumagi reassured his members that the CTA was willing to explore “out-of-the- box ideas” to ensure that “our unique voice” is heard.

Toby has asked that we remain patient for the next few months while they figure out a way for the Community College Association … to be fairly represented,” he wrote. “We are confident that CTA understands and acknowledges the unique challenges that face higher education and that they will seek to find a fair solution.”

Correction: This story was updated on Aug. 1 to reflect the position of E. Toby Boyd in the CTA at the time of his election as president.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments (6)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Mary ward 3 years ago3 years ago

    I am a conservative teacher. Perhaps I am an anomaly. I will never bow to the horrendous CTA.

  2. Tony Metcalf 4 years ago4 years ago

    I think Deb Bennett hit the nail on the head. Although Josephine Brinkman’s sentiments are correct – we should be united – the sad truth of the matter is that CTA has long overlooked CFA issues. And they based their priorities on the mathematical fact fact that they are 1) 10 times as numerous as CFA and 2) competition for general fund resources. Best to both organizations.

  3. Barbara J Walker 4 years ago4 years ago

    I agree with the colleges leaving. I am currently trying to pry help from my local CTA in Oxnard California and my rep has made it clear she is very busy with trainings, conferences and negotiations during the summer. I feel like the CTA /RTA is impotent and antiquated. I have had to seek out my own legal counsel out of my own pocket. I have been teaching and paying dues for 23 years … Read More

    I agree with the colleges leaving. I am currently trying to pry help from my local CTA in Oxnard California and my rep has made it clear she is very busy with trainings, conferences and negotiations during the summer. I feel like the CTA /RTA is impotent and antiquated. I have had to seek out my own legal counsel out of my own pocket. I have been teaching and paying dues for 23 years and when I finally need help I’m being told that they probably can’t help me. I have reached out to LULAC who helped me more in 20 minutes than CTA/RTA ever has. As a tenured seasoned teacher I don’t think I will have anything positive to say about CTA again nor will I encourage new teachers to join … it’s all for naught!

  4. Deborah Bennett 4 years ago4 years ago

    This article just reinforces all the negative things I've thought about CTA during and after my tenure as a K-12 teacher and a local union activist. I always was willing to give CTA its due, but I never revered the mighty CTA, especially after my husband became a member of the California Faculty Association and I realized just how little CTA did for the CSU faculty and staff. My main objection to CTA … Read More

    This article just reinforces all the negative things I’ve thought about CTA during and after my tenure as a K-12 teacher and a local union activist. I always was willing to give CTA its due, but I never revered the mighty CTA, especially after my husband became a member of the California Faculty Association and I realized just how little CTA did for the CSU faculty and staff.

    My main objection to CTA (and NEA, for that matter) was the lock-step form of governance that they clung to. It was a given that if you were Secretary-Treasurer of CTA, then you would be Vice-President and if you were Vice-President, then you would be President. That is how leadership was chosen for years and years and years. I think in my 30 years of active membership, there was only one instance of a person who was on the transcendent path being challenged by a board member who had made it to the chosen few and who succeeded. Passing over Montano is an unforgivable affront to the CFA. I am glad they decided to disaffiliate. I wonder if I can get a refund on my life dues I paid to CTA/NEA upon my retirement in 2010.

    To be honest, though, we were warned. The year my husband was hired for a tenure-track position at CSUSB, one of the deans took us out to lunch and we talked about the calculated decision CTA made to cut the California Faculty out of the Prop. 98 funding guarantees. Dr. John Sterns told us that was when he realized that CTA did not have, nor would ever have, the interests of the CFA as part of their agenda. He looked at my husband and I and said, “Shiiiiiit, we ain’t even a tick on that big dog’s back.”

    Replies

    • Barbara J Walker 4 years ago4 years ago

      I agree!!!!

  5. Josephine Brinkman 4 years ago4 years ago

    I find it disheartening that CFA would sever its relationship with CTA because we are supposed to be unified and it sounds a lot like sour grapes from people who are not willing to go with majority. Being unified for the ultimate good for all students and teachers is poor form. Too bad.