Black teachers: How to recruit them and make them stay
Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
David Kakishiba
Oakland Unified School District Superintendent Antwan Wilson will be leaving at the end of this month after having served only 2½ years in his position. Superintendent Wilson is the eighth superintendent I worked with over my 12-year tenure on the Oakland Board of Education. This revolving door of superintendents has been an incredible disservice to children, families and teachers. We cannot build a world-class public school system with the relentless leadership turnover we have endured.
I was board president in 2014 when we voted to hire Mr. Wilson to be our superintendent. Our public vote to select him was unanimous, but behind closed doors, debate among all seven board directors was profoundly telling. Despite broad-based community calls to the board to select a superintendent deeply committed to Oakland and advancing Oakland’s community schools agenda over the long haul, the majority of the board placed a higher value on the allure of a “rising national leader” – even knowing the risk that he will quickly job-hop to a larger urban school district – rather than selecting a proven local leader. Our action yielded exactly what we received: a first-time superintendent more career-driven than community-centered. As for myself, Superintendent Wilson’s short tenure in Oakland was completely predictable.
Oakland needs a superintendent who will stay on the job for the next 10 years, dedicating her or his life to the steady, step-by-step work of building and supporting our schools. Oakland can afford no less.
How does Oakland make this happen?
First, Oakland must resolve to select a superintendent who is deeply rooted in Oakland, for Oakland. The Oakland Unified Board of Education has heard this message repeatedly from Oakland’s institutional and community stakeholders ever since the district exited state receivership in 2009. Traditional executive head-hunting services have not yielded what Oakland needs, largely because these processes elevate the wrong drivers of success. Instead, we need to identify a leader who: 1) Has a substantive record of results in improving Oakland’s schools; 2) Can effectively operate in the public arena, and endure and persist amidst stressful, hard-headed political conditions; and 3) Demonstrates a sober, practical understanding of the time, discipline and humility needed from an institutional leader to foster transformative change.
Second, Oakland must resolve to select a superintendent who deeply understands and respects the governing role of the board. Our publicly elected board is entrusted to establish strategic priorities, enact policies and budgets, and oversee the superintendent’s work performance. The superintendent must support the board – a group fundamentally comprised of volunteers – to effectively govern through practicing transparent disclosure of school district performance, engaging and embracing diverse points of view, and maintaining discipline in decision-making and follow-through. An informed and engaged board of education is a superintendent’s best friend through good, bad and ugly times.
Finally, Oakland should expect the next superintendent to advance a small number of strategic priorities – not a long list of projects and initiatives that lead nowhere but an empty wallet. Here are three priorities that will best drive school improvement in Oakland if worked through with consistent, disciplined leadership.
Oakland must reaffirm its commitment to make every school a full-service community school. This commitment begins with valuing and supporting the professionalism of our teachers. The next superintendent must marshal resources to enable teachers, in partnership with health, social service, and youth development professionals, to build structures and implement practices that normalize shared decision-making, foster instructional improvement and innovation, and provide early and sustained support to struggling students. Fostering a professional culture in every school is a fundamental condition for teachers and other educators to equitably and effectively support all children.
Oakland’s 63 percent high school graduation rate is, by double-digits, the lowest of all California urban school districts with student populations of 35,000 or more. Oakland’s next superintendent is responsible for effectively investing $24 million annually of new local parcel tax revenue, made possible by the support of Oakland voters in 2014 (Measure N – College & Career Readiness for All Act) and 2016 (Measure G1 – Teacher Retention & Middle School Improvement Act). Both measures send a clear community message to the Oakland Unified School District: We’re giving you more money, we support your roadmap, and now get every student graduated from high school prepared for college, career, and the challenges and opportunities Oakland has to offer.
Oakland is challenged with managing an extraordinarily large number of schools – 128 and counting. California Education Code does not allow a local school district to manage the number and type of publicly financed, privately operated charter schools operating within its jurisdiction. Oakland has 45 charter schools serving nearly 12,000 children. The vast majority of charter schools provide their students a solid education, but their uncontrolled expansion has spawned complex challenges to the common good – inequitable student assignment, diminishing school revenue, and a growing, ever-contentious political war between “pro-charter” and “anti-charter” advocates. Our next superintendent must unite these constituencies and others around a common interest to win state legislation that provides Oakland local control over the number and type of schools that can operate.
Oakland has numerous leaders who can take on the top job with confidence, including those from within the Oakland Unified School District (current and former employees), charter school organizations and the nonprofit service sector.
In these challenging national and local times, Oakland needs a committed superintendent to do the essential and unglamorous work of building and supporting our schools, every single day.
•••
David Kakishiba served on the Oakland Unified School District Board of Education from 2003 to 2014, including five years as president. He is the chairman of the Measure N College & Career Readiness Commission, a parcel tax measure authorized by Oakland voters in November 2014.
The opinions expressed in this commentary represent those of the authors. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.
Part-time instructors, many who work for decades off the tenure track and at a lower pay rate, have been called “apprentices to nowhere.”
A bill to mandate use of the method will not advance in the Legislature this year in the face of teachers union opposition.
Nearly a third of the 930 districts statewide that reported data had a higher rate of chronic absenteeism in 2022-23 than the year before.
The move puts the fate of AB 2222 in question, but supporters insist that there is room to negotiate changes that can help tackle the state’s literacy crisis.
Comments (5)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Melissa Barry 7 years ago7 years ago
We need to put as many resources directly in the classroom for our students! There are so many support providers, who never get into the classroom! Oakland students deserve more direct education from their district! As a teacher, I get books and no training or time to prepare the curriculum. Teachers cannot fill all of the deficiencies in their classrooms, but we will die trying!
Donald L Macleay 7 years ago7 years ago
We need a superintendent who is independent. With GO Advocates, Broad Academy and other privatization/charter money exercising enormous undue influence over Oakland education, Wilson could never claim that independence.
Rachel Reinhard 7 years ago7 years ago
Thank you for this thoughtful reflection on what Oakland needs. It is heartening to know that the board was having conversations behind closed doors with regard to the appointment of Superintendent Wilson and understood the very real limitations of a career, rather than community, oriented leader. I hope we can use this opportunity to grow community conversations and identify a local educator committed to the long term justice work of leading our schools.
S. h. 7 years ago7 years ago
Mr. Kakashiba was present at the school closures debacle of 2010-2011- I know I was there. And by his own admission he was part of the group that hired Wilson behind close doors. And his idea of continuing "unification" strategy is the downfall of this city's PUBLIC schools because all of the charters are siphoning off the revenue provided by the state. Any future superintendent must be willing to champion vociferously the public' interests not … Read More
Mr. Kakashiba was present at the school closures debacle of 2010-2011- I know I was there. And by his own admission he was part of the group that hired Wilson behind close doors. And his idea of continuing “unification” strategy is the downfall of this city’s PUBLIC schools because all of the charters are siphoning off the revenue provided by the state. Any future superintendent must be willing to champion vociferously the public’ interests not the privately run interests.
ELLEN WHEELER 7 years ago7 years ago
I am also a school board member, though not from Oakland. I commend Mr. Kakishiba for his excellent commentary about how school board members and superintendents should work together. This was like a primer for trustees.