Credit: Courtesy of Marshall Tuck campaign
Candidates for state superintendent of public instruction, Marshall Tuck, left, and Tom Torlakson listen to remarks preceding a forum in Burlingame, the last joint appearance scheduled before the election in November 2014.

Marshall Tuck, who narrowly lost to incumbent State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson in 2014, became the first candidate Monday to announce he’s running to succeed Torlakson, whose final term is up next year.

A former charter school executive and administrator of independently run schools in Los Angeles Unified, Tuck said in an interview that he’s pursuing the job for the same reason he ran the first time: to challenge the nation’s wealthiest state to commit its innovation and attention to improving education for the state’s highest-poverty students.

In 2014, Tuck, Torlakson and independent campaign committees spent $30 million – three times the spending in the governor’s race – in the most expensive statewide campaign that year. The California Teachers Association and other unions backed Torlakson, and wealthy donors, many of whom were heavy contributors to charter schools, supported Tuck in what became a referendum on workplace protections for teachers. Torlakson won with 52 percent of the vote. (For some of EdSource’s articles on the campaign, go here, here and here.)

Tuck, 43, said he continues to favor revising the state’s tenure law, granting due process rights in less than two years, and revising the state’s teacher evaluation system. But the issues of overriding importance, he said, are the need to establish “phenomenal” training and mentoring programs for principals and new teachers and “for more support for students with the greatest needs.”

There was an overemphasis in the last campaign on the 10 percent of the issues that were divisive and less on the other 90 percent, he said. The critical shortage of special education teachers “has a greater level of importance than a better tenure policy,” he said.

The nonpartisan office of state superintendent runs the California Department of Education, but the State Board of Education, appointed by the governor, sets education policy. Still, Tuck said, the state superintendent has influence, and the department’s primary challenge, in an era of local control, should be to identify and spread best instructional practices.

Tuck praised changes in school financing and governance under Gov. Jerry Brown: the Local Control Funding Formula, which channels significant money to low-income children and English learners, and the state’s new school accountability system, which incorporates multiple ways of measuring school performance. But, he said, there needs to be a closer examination to see that the neediest students are getting the money allocated for them, and the new “dashboard” of multiple measures should be clearer and easier for parents to understand. “The system is well-intentioned but needs to be better executed,” he said.

Tuck led school improvement efforts for 12 years, as founding CEO of the Partnership for Los Angeles Schools, a nonprofit operating 16 Los Angeles Unified schools, and before that, as president of Green Dot Public Schools, a charter school operator based in Los Angeles. Since 2015, he has been Educator-in-Residence at the New Teacher Center, a Santa Cruz-based nonprofit, helping to develop the organization’s strategic plan and mentoring programs for teachers and principals.

SHARE ARTICLE

Comments (3)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments Policy

The goal of the comments section on EdSource is to facilitate thoughtful conversation about content published on our website. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Richard Moore 2 months ago2 months ago

    What is his history as a teacher?

    Replies

    • John Fensterwald 2 months ago2 months ago

      No direct classroom experience, Richard.

      • Manuel 2 months ago2 months ago

        I don't believe he has any experience in what we normally consider teaching, John. Not even a TFA stint. As for his other qualifications, yes, he has a Harvard MBA but has never held a California administrative credential, something that is usually required of district Superintendents (yes, I am aware that there have been exceptions, none of them forgettable). But relevant experience for important jobs is superfluous in this day and age, I suppose. BTW, … Read More

        I don’t believe he has any experience in what we normally consider teaching, John. Not even a TFA stint. As for his other qualifications, yes, he has a Harvard MBA but has never held a California administrative credential, something that is usually required of district Superintendents (yes, I am aware that there have been exceptions, none of them forgettable). But relevant experience for important jobs is superfluous in this day and age, I suppose.

        BTW, before the two positions you list, his career was as an analyst (Salomon Brothers, 2 years), and general manager (Model N, 2 years). Given this job history, his being “Educator in Residence” at NTC for nearly the past two years is “interesting,” to say the least.

        Sure, anyone teaching in higher education does not need a certificate from the state, but since he is not associated with any college or university, I find it hard to take that title seriously. But that’s just me and others surely will vehemently disagree.