Credit: Jane Meredith Adams/EdSource
Music class at Rogers Elementary in Chula Vista includes students receiving special education services.

Already, the California Department of Education has said it doesn’t want to do it and doesn’t need to do it. But for the second time this year, a strongly worded report has called for the department to keep track of the $400 million a year that school districts are supposed to spend on mental health services for special education students and produce an annual report on their outcomes.

“The California Department of Education has completely abdicated any responsibility for monitoring or oversight of this program,” said Antionette Dozier, senior attorney at the Western Center on Law & Poverty, a Los Angeles-based statewide advocacy group that co-authored the report. As a result, she said, hundreds of thousands of students are not getting the mental health care they need, resulting in distress, poor academic performance and in some cases, referrals into the juvenile justice system.

The report, “Failing Grade: How California’s School Districts Have Abandoned Children with Disabilities,” was released Monday by the Western Center on Law & Poverty, the Los Angeles-based Learning Rights Law Center and the Los Angeles-based nonprofit group Mental Health Advocacy Services.

The California Department of Education did not respond to a request for a comment. But the department did respond to a January report from the California state auditor that similarly recommended the department produce an annual report on the kinds and costs of mental health services that districts provide to students in special education. The report should include how those students fared on a number of academic and social measures, the auditor stated.

In response to the auditor’s recommendation, Tom Torlakson, state superintendent of public instruction, wrote, “Education does not and is not required by state or federal law to calculate performance and/or outcome measures for any particular subgroup of special education students.” He said that if the Legislature required the California Department of Education to compile additional reports, it would need additional staff and funding.

The “Failing Grade” report cited an example of how a lack of mental health services bleeds into discipline issues. A student given the pseudonym Veronica was 14 when she saw her twin brother murdered, the report said. After that emotional trauma, she became withdrawn and uncommunicative at school, but was not referred for mental health care. On a day she was feeling upset, she attempted to exit school grounds but was stopped by a school resource officer and they scuffled. According to the report, the school had Veronica arrested and she was made a ward of the court. While on probation, she was referred for a mental health assessment, diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and received mental health services, the report said.

School districts should take “immediate action” to comply with special education law by identifying children in need of services, “particularly before taking disciplinary actions or engaging law enforcement,” the report stated. It recommended that districts provide a mental health needs assessment after certain “triggering” events, such as a number of disciplinary incidents or suspensions, or when the school is considering contacting police to deal with student behavior.

Mental health services for students with behavior disorders could include a plan for rewarding positive behavior, mentoring on social skills, “check ins” throughout the day and group sessions on anger management skills and conflict resolution strategies, the report said.

The unmet need is great, the report said, referencing data from the state auditor’s report.

Citing a 2013 California HealthCare Foundation report that stated 7.6 percent of children in the state suffer from a severe emotional disturbance, the state auditor estimated that 700,000 children had that condition. Yet from July 2010 to July 2015, only between 104,000 and 120,000 students in California received mental health services as part of their special education individual plan.

As a result, as many as 580,000 children are not getting needed school-based mental health services, the auditor’s report suggested.

State Sen. Jim Beall, D-San Jose, has sponsored two pieces of related legislation. Senate Bill 884 would require that the California Department of Education track the mental health services provided, the costs and the outcomes. Senate Bill 1113 would encourage districts and their regional Special Education Local Plan Areas to tap into additional federal funding for student mental health by creating partnerships with county mental health offices. Funding under the federal Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment Program, which provides Medi-Cal eligible students with mental health services that include assessment, case management and crisis intervention, is available only through county departments, which can pass along those funds to schools by creating contracts with them.

About 30 years ago, schools were in charge of providing mental health services to students in special education, said Jim Preis, executive director of the Mental Health Advocacy Services. “But kids weren’t getting services,” he said.

Then-Speaker of the Assembly Willie Brown, D-San Francisco, introduced Assembly Bill 3632, enacted by the Legislature in 1984, which shifted the responsibility to county mental health offices, Preis said, a system that was in place for about 25 years. In the economic downturn of 2007, payments for those services dried up, he said.

“One of the budgeting tricks that was done to get through those tough years was to basically not pay the county to provide health services and to rack up a debt,” he said.

As a result, when the 2011 Assembly Bill 114 budget trailer bill moved mental health services back to the schools, the counties didn’t protest too much, he said. But compliance has been an issue, he said.

The shift created a “disincentive” for schools to identify students in need of mental health services, he said, because that money now comes out of funds already allocated to schools. Previously, county mental health offices would provide the services and bill the state for them.

But the $400 million budget for mental health in special education is large, Dozier said. “I don’t know that school districts can argue they don’t have sufficient funding to provide these services,” she said.

Share Article

Comments (5)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * *

Comments Policy

The goal of the comments section on EdSource is to facilitate thoughtful conversation about content published on our website. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.

  1. Bob Hickman 3 years ago3 years ago

    I work in children’s mental health in Sacramento County and have a special interest in the problem you wrote about. The system of care has many gaps and the children and families are not getting the services they need. The agency I work for has been trying to introduce a school based program to fill the gaps but are being met with resistance. Please write more about this issue

  2. Lydia Fernandez 3 years ago3 years ago

    Gilroy and Morgan Hill Unified School districts are always saying there is not enough funding for our children with special needs. You should contact Linda McNulty at CRL consulting who is spearheading this issue in Sacramento.

  3. Margaret Cherene 3 years ago3 years ago

    Please be aware that for the 30 years the county mental health provided services to special education students and had absolutely no accountability for student outcomes either. In fact, coordination and communication with school personnel and parents was terrible. And costs skyrocketed! Asking county mental health to serve these students again is a terrible idea! Many states recognize that the general student population has significant mental health needs, not just students in special education. How … Read More

    Please be aware that for the 30 years the county mental health provided services to special education students and had absolutely no accountability for student outcomes either. In fact, coordination and communication with school personnel and parents was terrible. And costs skyrocketed! Asking county mental health to serve these students again is a terrible idea!
    Many states recognize that the general student population has significant mental health needs, not just students in special education. How about California? We should not have to identify students as disabled (or poor enough to qualify for Medi-Cal) in order for them to access mental health services in school or the community.

  4. John Thomas Flynn 3 years ago3 years ago

    $400 million a year, and Superintendent Torlakson, says, “Education does not and is not required by state or federal law to calculate performance and/or outcome measures for any particular subgroup of special education students.” Woe be that schools had to assess performance.

  5. Scott Berenson 3 years ago3 years ago

    My daughter experienced the loss of her mother to pancreatic cancer at 14 and then suffered a brain injury which caused a seizure disorder an a lot of depression and anxiety. I asked her school district (McClatchy HS) for group mental health treatment, the MH treatment of choice for a teenager who would rather receive support from her peers than an adult. They said there was no such program, but they could put my daughter … Read More

    My daughter experienced the loss of her mother to pancreatic cancer at 14 and then suffered a brain injury which caused a seizure disorder an a lot of depression and anxiety. I asked her school district (McClatchy HS) for group mental health treatment, the MH treatment of choice for a teenager who would rather receive support from her peers than an adult. They said there was no such program, but they could put my daughter in a group they could cobble together with formerly incarcerated youth. No thanks! Worse than useless. No accountability and no available services. What a shame and a dereliction of duty by Superintendent Torlakson. Our children deserve better.