Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
Library or police, a small town’s struggle puts a spotlight on library inequities across California
A $9 billion state school construction bond measure is facing stiff headwinds six weeks before the November election, with less than half of likely voters supporting it, according to a new poll from the Public Policy Institute of California.
Faring better was an initiative to extend the personal income tax on the wealthiest Californians, the bulk of which would fund K-12 schools and community colleges and health care for the poor. But the 54 percent backing it is not a comfortable margin, with only 4 in 10 voters saying that the initiative is very important to them, said Mark Baldassare, president and CEO of the independent, nonpartisan research nonprofit.
The PPIC poll of 1,702 likely California voters found that 47 percent would vote yes on the school bond, Proposition 51, and 43 percent would vote no, with 10 percent undecided. Support among parents with children in school was slightly higher, 53 percent.
The poll, taken this month, marks an erosion of support since an April PPIC poll, when 62 percent favored the bond and 35 percent opposed it. Gov. Jerry Brown, who said he might have supported a small bond based on districts’ needs and not on a first-come, first-served basis, has called the proposal “a blunderbuss effort that promotes sprawl and squanders money that would be far better spent in low-income communities.” Editorial boards at the San Diego Union-Tribune, Mercury News and East Bay Times have come out in opposition.
The state has run out of school construction money to hand out, with several billion dollars of approved projects in the pipeline. The $9 billion in funding would be divided $7 billion for K-12 schools ($3 billion for new construction, $3 billion for modernization, $500 million for charter schools and $500 million for career technical education facilities) and $2 billion for community colleges. Schools and community colleges would have to match state funding for a share of the money. The full state repayment in principal and interest would be $17.6 billion over 35 years.
In the latest poll, 62 percent of Democrats said they would vote yes, while 64 percent of Republicans would vote no. Support was strongest in the San Francisco Bay Area (54 percent) and weakest in the Central Valley (38 percent).
In 2012, voters approved Proposition 30, which temporarily increased the state sales tax and the personal income tax on the wealthiest 1.5 percent of earners, those making more than $250,000 per year. Proposition 55 would extend just the income tax until 2030. It would raise between $4 billion and $9 billion per year in revenue, depending on the stock market and state revenue, with roughly half going to K-12 schools and community colleges — and more than half in some years, depending on intricacies of the formula for determining education funding, spelled out in Proposition 98.
With 8 percent still undecided, 54 percent were in favor of Prop. 55 and 38 percent were opposed, about the same margin as a USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll earlier this month. But support had declined from 62 percent in an April PPIC poll.
Proposition 30 passed four years ago with 55 percent support, but schools faced the prospect of massive funding cuts at the time, and Brown campaigned hard for it. So far, there is not the same sense of urgency among voters this year, Baldassare said, and Brown is not expected to campaign actively for it.
In the latest survey, more Latinos (68 percent) and members of other racial/ethnic groups (66 percent) were in favor than whites (48 percent). There was much more support among younger voters and those making less than $40,000 than among older and more affluent voters. More than three-quarters of Democrats favored it, compared with a third of Republicans. Independent voters were split 51 percent in support to 42 percent opposed, with 7 percent undecided.
The poll also found:
The system has enrolled more in-state residents, but not enough to meet targets set by the state.
Two prominent organizations say the proposal would dismantle progress made to improve reading instruction for those students.
Fresno City College professor Tom Boroujeni is unable to fulfill his duties as academic senate president while on leave, the latest update reads.
This is a continuing EdSource series on proven innovations in higher education that relate to the problems facing California’s higher education systems.
Comments (3)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Jaycen Russell 7 years ago7 years ago
One of us is misreading the poll numbers. Your first sentence states that the school bond isn’t likely to pass, but Q30 on the poll has 61% of registered, “likely” voters supporting it and over 80% supporting it in the overall poll. Has math changed that much since I was in school?
Replies
John Fensterwald 7 years ago7 years ago
Jaycen: I refer you to page 10 of the poll summary. The latest PPIC poll, which we write about today, is consistent with the earlier poll. Fewer than half of likely voters say they would vote for Prop. 51.
Leslie Rose 7 years ago7 years ago
Proposition 51 is the best option Californian’s have for insuring the repair and maintenance of school facilities. We have been waiting for years for the state to re-commit to supporting school facilities in our state. This bond measure is essential for California schools and for California school children.