Not long ago I was at a meeting of community college and high school faculty, talking about college readiness in our region. “Tell us what we need to do,” said one high school teacher, frustrated that so many of her students were ending up in remedial courses when they enrolled in a community college. “We really want them to be prepared for you guys.”
Three-quarters of California community college students are classified “unprepared” upon entry, and their long-term outcomes are bleak. Just 40 percent of unprepared students go on to complete a degree or certificate, or transfer, within six years, compared to 70 percent of prepared students.
This is often framed as a “college readiness” problem in the high schools, but a growing body of research shows that incoming students are actually more ready than community colleges have recognized.
The Community College Research Center examined data from a large, urban community college system and found that many of the students placed into remedial courses didn’t actually need remediation. The study estimated that 61 percent of incoming students could earn a C or better in college-level English courses if allowed to enroll, but only 19 percent were eligible to do so under the placement test administered to incoming students. In math, the study predicted that 50 percent of incoming students would succeed in college-level courses, while just 25 percent were eligible to take them.
To understand this, you need to know how community colleges determine “readiness.” For the most part, colleges don’t review student transcripts, or assess samples of student writing. Instead, students take placement tests consisting of short, multiple-choice questions in English and math, often without preparing or understanding the stakes. And if they score below a certain level, they are required to take up to two years of remedial reading, writing and/or math courses. If they’re placed into English as a second language courses, it could be more than two years.
Placement tests are weak predictors of students’ performance in college. A second CCRC study found that standardized reading and writing tests explain less than 2 percent of the variation in students’ college grades. ACT’s Compass – one of the most popular placement tests used nationally – is being taken off the market, with the test-maker directly acknowledging its limitations in assessing readiness.
By relying on these tests, community colleges underestimate the abilities of many students. This was illustrated by the Multiple Measures Assessment Project, which analyzed a large dataset from California high schools and community colleges. The researchers determined that 72 percent of incoming community college students could be placed directly into college-level English courses by using high school transcript measures instead of their scores on placement tests, and that these students would do just fine, earning an average grade of C+. In other words, nearly three-quarters of students are coming out of high school prepared for college English.
Another problem with colleges’ current approach is the use of a single, algebra-based definition of “readiness” in math. A student with shaky algebra skills might be under-prepared for a Pre-Calculus course, but that same student could do perfectly well in College Statistics, because little algebra is required there. Colleges and universities need to recognize that different college-level courses demand different prerequisite math skills (as the University of California has recently done for Statistics courses). Unless a course requires substantial algebra – that is, unless a student is highly unlikely to succeed without it – algebra-based testing and prerequisites are not legitimate.
Why does all this matter? Because placement is destiny. When students are assessed “not college ready,” the treatment prescribed – layers of remedial coursework – leaves them less likely to reach their goals. Statewide, among community college students who start three or more courses below college math, just six out of 100 will complete a math course within three years that they can use to transfer to a four-year university.
One recent study found that students’ initial course placement is the single largest driver of racial inequities in long-term college completion rates. African-American and Hispanic students are much more likely to be excluded from college-level courses based on our non-predictive placement tests. These students are also disproportionately concentrated in the lowest levels of remedial math, a starting point from which they have virtually no chance of earning a degree.
In a little over a year, California community colleges will begin piloting a new “common assessment” system, with all 113 colleges administering the same English, ESL and math tests to their incoming students. Plans are also underway to include high school transcript information, such as students’ grade point average and English and math coursework, so that colleges can consider this in course placement. But for the system to be effective and benefit all students, the California Department of Education needs to provide statewide, automated high school transcript data to community colleges, rather than the scattershot, district-by-district transcript-sharing currently in place.
The shift to a common assessment provides a tremendous opportunity for community colleges. Research shows that by enabling more students to begin taking college-level courses as soon as they enroll, colleges can substantially increase student completion and narrow achievement gaps for students of color. Even greater power lies in combining changes in course placements with redesigned, accelerated models of remediation, which are helping many more students to complete college-level requirements in California and other states.
Over the last several years, there has been a lot of research into the disappointing completion rates among students classified “under-prepared.” But there is reason for optimism: When colleges accelerate students’ progress into college-level courses, they’re seeing that students are much more prepared than previously believed.
Katie Hern is an English instructor at Chabot College and co-founder of the California Acceleration Project, a statewide professional development network that supports community colleges in transforming remediation to increase student completion and equity.
The opinions expressed in this commentary represent those of the author. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.
To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Eric Martinsen 7 years ago7 years ago
I strongly support Katie Hern’s proposal for the California Department of Education “to provide statewide, automated high school transcript data to community colleges” as a part of the new common assessment. An effective, research-based use of multiple measures for placement will be difficult to scale without a digitized transcript.
Krynn Parham 8 years ago8 years ago
I think this is good news on how the assessments for community college are given..however I have personally seen students that are still failing to be prepared for taking that next step to college, especially in math and english, by the time they are seniors in high school they should be performing at the next level. It is the failure of our public schools that spend more time on diversity, social and peer pressure issues … Read More
I think this is good news on how the assessments for community college are given..however I have personally seen students that are still failing to be prepared for taking that next step to college, especially in math and english, by the time they are seniors in high school they should be performing at the next level. It is the failure of our public schools that spend more time on diversity, social and peer pressure issues than time spent learning in the classroom. Administration is more concerned about getting paid for students attending and prepping for Common Core than actual learning as it relates to college preparedness. My concern is that by lowering admission standards that students are not able to reach beyond the community college level. Isn’t the goal of Community College to help those who aren’t academically and/or financially qualified to reach the University level and obtain a higher degree? Are we not encouraging that goal anymore? It alarms me that no one is setting the bar (educationally) and encouraging students to reach for it. Up until this year even the CSU system was allowing “local” area” students to enroll despite the fact they didn’t meet the academic standards. Case in point I recently read an article written by 3rd year student from CSU-Fresno and it was shocking! So poorly written and segments that were plagerized! Worse yet it was published in the Clovis Unified School District publication that is distributed to all staff, faculty and parents. The fact that this student attended the same school as where my son currently attends is alarming. Where did this student go wrong and what has she been learning since high school? My son has been taking AP and college credit classes in both math, science, and english for 4 years at Clovis East High School and this year he is taking a writing/literature class that is acceredited through Clovis Community College. Recently his instructor submitted a broad range of samples of their first writing assignment (including worst to best) to her peer at CCC who was shocked to see how much better the high school students were performing than the college students. What happens after these kids go to college? How are they underperforming? Even more alarming is the fact that at the 4 year college level remedial courses are still being taught..why are they even admitted to college IF they aren’t prepared to perform? There needs to be a better assessment at the HIGH SCHOOL level in order for these students to be prepared at even the Community College level. The dumbing down of this country is alarming and Colleges and Universities should be mandating to K-12 that THEY need the overhaul of academic standards as well!