A bill that gives funding priority to summer programs for students and sets new quality standards for all out-of-school programs has passed the Legislature and is awaiting approval by the governor.
Senate Bill 1221, authored by Sen. Loni Hancock, D-Oakland, would give priority to schools that seek funds to provide year-round learning, which in most cases would be a combination of after-school and summer programs, said Jessica Gunderson, policy director for Partnership for Children and Youth, which, along with state Superintendent Tom Torlakson, is sponsoring the bill.
“The bill is promoting year-round learning by acknowledging the important role of summer in how to allocate expanded learning resources,” Gunderson said. “Year-round learning is the ideal.”
Research has shown that all students fall behind about two months in math skills during the summer break, and that low-income students also lose about two months in reading proficiency if they are not in a quality summer program. Researchers say this loss is a major contributor to the achievement gap between low-income students and their higher-income peers.
The $550 million in state funding through the After School Education & Safety Program is limited to K-8 after-school programs. The new bill, if signed into law by the governor, would allow schools that offer after-school programs themselves or through community partners to get priority funding for summer programs. That money – about $120 million – would come from federal 21st Century Community Learning Centers program funding.
Community Learning Centers grants can be used to operate after-school programs and summer programs, with no priority for either. The result has been that less than 5 percent of California’s state and federal funding has gone to summer programs, Gunderson said. After-school and summer programs “are equally important for young people,” she said.
The bill will also require programs to submit evidence of continuous quality improvement based on recently adopted standards by the California Department of Education. “It’s like an LCAP,” Gunderson said, referring to the Local Control and Accountability Plans districts must create that set measurable goals for program quality. The After School Division standards set parameters that define quality, she said, but there is local flexibility. For example, the measurements of success might be quite different between a sports and an arts program.
The bill would also require the California Department of Education to develop and submit a biennial report to the Legislature on student attendance and the quality of expanded learning programs, based on data.
In addition, the bill sets aside transportation funding for after-school or summer programs in rural areas where students live far from the school and there is no public transportation. It also folds in federal literacy program funding to reduce administrative costs.
Meanwhile, the California Department of Education is setting up a Policy Guide Committee “to develop, implement and maintain clear policies” that support expanded learning programs. The first meeting is expected to take place in September.
We need your help ...
Unlike many news outlets, EdSource does not secure its content behind a paywall. We believe that informing the largest possible audience about what is working in education — and what isn't — is far more important.
Once a year, however, we ask our readers to contribute as generously as they can so that we can do justice to reporting on a topic as vast and complex as California's education system — from early education to postsecondary success.
Thanks to support from several philanthropic foundations, EdSource is participating in NewsMatch. As a result, your tax-deductible gift to EdSource will be worth three times as much to us — and allow us to do more hard hitting, high-impact reporting that makes a difference. Don’t wait. Please make a contribution now.