(This commentary first appeared in TOP-Ed.)

Schools are like businesses, but not in the way most think.

I frequently find myself in conversations comparing “how it works in business” with “how it works in education.” A popular version goes something like this:

Schools are like factories. They take raw materials (kids and textbooks) and, through years of education, forge a valuable product: young adults prepared for college, life, and work. In this analogy, teachers work the assembly line, supervised by the principal.

Most educators bristle at this analogy. Are teachers really like factory workers? Are students really products? (If they are defective, asks Stanford education professor and author Larry Cuban,can we send them back?)

Here’s a more useful analogy:

Schools are like consulting businesses. The students are knowledge workers, organized into teams to analyze and solve problems, in the process demonstrating their mastery of valuable learning standards. In this analogy, teachers are the managers.

This analogy seems closer to the mark. After all, schools function only if it is the studentswho dothe work. Teachers cannot do it for them. Like any managers of inexperienced workers, teachers’ truest aim is to bring out the best in their charges. They organize, assign, challenge, cajole, and motivate. Through success and failure, teachers develop their students’ capacity to take on bigger challenges with better results and increasing independence.

Thinking of teachers as managers also helps to shed light on the complex responsibilities of the school principal. Imagine running a knowledge-sector organization with hundreds of young, inexperienced, and sometimes unruly employees. Now imagine that your budget compels you to organize the business with a very flat structure, with only one group leader for every thirty or so beginners. This is the structure of most elementary schools.

Middle school changes everything. In business terms, it’s equivalent to a massive reorganization. From middle school onward, our young knowledge workers are assembled into six or more different teams per day, switching academic contexts each hour like fully-booked consultants jumping from one project to the next. They no longer have a clearly defined manager; teachers in middle and high schools often interact with more than a hundred students per day. What’s more, the relationships among teachers and students shift once per semester as students complete courses, or fail them.

Few if any knowledge-sectorbusinesses would put managers in a direct reporting relationship with such a largenumber of workers, especially inexperienced ones. Nor would they shift workers among assignments with such casual speed, especially if they are struggling to complete the work. Schools do so every day. Is it any wonder students get lost?

Finally, this: Who is the customer? Who demands the work that students produce with their teachers’ guidance? For lucky students,an engaged and prepared adult figure is the discerning customer, demanding good work and providing useful feedback. Some parents play this role well, but not all can or will.

Jeff Camp chairs the Education Circle of Full Circle Fund, an engaged philanthropy organization cultivating the next generation of community leaders and driving lasting social change in the Bay Area and beyond. He is the primary author of Ed100.org, a primer on education reform options in California. Since leaving a career at Microsoft to work for education change, Jeff has served on multiple education reform committees, including the Governor’s Committee on Education Excellence.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.

Share Article

Comments are closed

Join the conversation by going to Edsource's Twitter or Facebook pages. If you do not have a social media account, you can learn how to create a Twitter account here and a Facebook account here.

  1. Pamzella 11 years ago11 years ago

    Much better analogy, and reform methods that considered this model would certainly come to different conclusions about what might work in education.  After all, don’t the big consulting firms do things like retreats, etc. to build teamwork?  And isn’t there a tendency in schools with a strong community atmosphere including teachers, students, and parents to do better in terms of academics and other important factors like bullying or disruptive behavior?

  2. el 11 years ago11 years ago

    This is an interesting analogy… I like it.
    In IT, directly managing and mentoring 10 young computer programmers would be seen as a pretty demanding load.