Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
Library or police, a small town’s struggle puts a spotlight on library inequities across California
The California State Board of Education intends to do away with a school rating system that ranks schools based primarily on standardized test scores. However, GreatSchools, an Oakland-based nonprofit that provides millions of parents nationwide with information about their children’s schools, believes the index has vital information that California parents want and has launched a new project to make that data easier to find.
In partnership with Innovate Public Schools, a San Jose-based advocacy group that organizes low-income, minority parents, GreatSchools has expanded its standard 1-to-10 ranking of schools (10 being highest) to include additional features for California schools:
The latter feature reflects the twin goals of the project: consumer choice and activism, said Matt Hammer, founder and CEO of Innovate Public Schools. Families may not be able to move to a nearby district, but they can press their school board to explain why their school isn’t doing as well as one nearby with similar children, he said.
“We want to make data useful for advocacy by families who want good options for children who historically have not achieved at high levels and been served well by schools,” said Bill Jackson, GreatSchools president and CEO.
GreatSchools uses information the California Department of Education posts online, including the new California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance, or CASPP, website with the Smarter Balanced results by district and school, including student subgroups. GreatSchools brings information together in one place, makes it easier to compare schools and translates the test data and methodology into understandable language. (Ed-Data, a partnership of the California Department of Education, the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team/California School Information Services, and EdSource, also has a useful school and district comparison tool but has not yet included Smarter Balanced results.)
Students’ scores on Smarter Balanced tests fall into four performance levels: “Standards not met,” “standards nearly met,” “standards met” and “standards exceeded.” GreatSchools defines Standards met and Standards exceeded as the equivalent of “proficient” and then ranks schools 1 to 10 based on the percentage of students in a school who score proficient. Bay Area schools whose scores and other metrics fall in the bottom 30 percent are enumerated in red; schools in the middle 40 percent are in orange and in the top 30 percent are in green. The terms and colors make it easier to see where schools stand at a quick glance, Hammer said.
GreatSchools currently ranks schools in 39 states based on test scores alone. Its indexes in 11 states and Washington, D.C., also factor in yearly growth in test scores and a college readiness indicator. Next year, using the second year of the Smarter Balanced scores, GreatSchools will also build these factors into its California schools index, and show other measurements of performance in a school report. “We plan to add clear, quantifiable data and also qualitative data that may be less comparable across schools,” Hammer said.
GreatSchools also plans to expand features in the pilot districts to schools statewide. Innovate Public Schools is introducing the index to parents through its Parent Action Network.
The new state school accountability system that the state board is creating will also show school performance in multiple metrics, but not a single-number index, which board members view as simplistic. The board suspended the state’s former Academic Performance Index two years ago. Last week, the California Office to Reform Education released its new school quality index for the 1,153 schools in the CORE districts, which include Los Angeles Unified, San Francisco Unified and Long Beach Unified. The districts developed it as a condition of a waiver from the No Child Left Behind Law.
GreatSchools’ site includes guides to the Common Core, parenting advice and articles on children’s brain development and social emotional learning. Parents can also review their children’s schools.
The system has enrolled more in-state residents, but not enough to meet targets set by the state.
Two prominent organizations say the proposal would dismantle progress made to improve reading instruction for those students.
Fresno City College professor Tom Boroujeni is unable to fulfill his duties as academic senate president while on leave, the latest update reads.
This is a continuing EdSource series on proven innovations in higher education that relate to the problems facing California’s higher education systems.
Comments (3)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Roxana Marachi 8 years ago8 years ago
Both “Great Schools” and “Innovate Public Schools” are funded by privatization-pushing corporate donors, heavily invested in corporate charter reform as well as the invalid computerized tests being used as a [false] metric to legitimize demand. Over 100+ articles are provided here, many of which document the intersections between organizations, funders, ALEC laws that paved the way for charter growth policies, takeover impacts, and resulting harms to communities of color: http://bit.ly/chart_look
Replies
Gary Ravani 8 years ago8 years ago
Very well and succinctly stated.
Paul Muench 8 years ago8 years ago
Much better than having the state do this type of work. It would be good to see some competing indices eventually.