Black teachers: How to recruit them and make them stay
Lessons in higher education: What California can learn
Keeping California public university options open
Superintendents: Well-paid and walking away
The debt to degree connection
College in prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
A coalition 37 of education advocacy and civil rights groups from across the country want more input into how states and the federal government implement the new Every Student Succeeds Act to ensure it better serves high-needs students, such as low-income children and English learners.
The coalition, which includes the NAACP, the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and the Children’s Defense Fund, issued a joint letter Friday to the U.S. Department of Education.
In the letter, the coalition asked for states and the federal government to increase parental outreach, provide more relevant standardized tests for English learners and students with disabilities, ensure a stronger focus on intervention for schools with the lowest test scores, and create a system to disseminate student data that is easy for parents and the community to understand.
“Without a robust and thoughtful implementation of (the federal law) over the next decade, we will have missed a crucial opportunity and the students we represent will continue to be denied the full protections they need and are entitled to under federal law,” according to the four-page letter.
President Barack Obama signed the Every Student Succeeds Act into law in December after it passed through Congress with strong bipartisan support.
The law symbolized the largest turn toward local control in three decades, allowing states to regain the authority to set their own educational goals, measurements of school performance and methods for school improvement.
From a California perspective, lawmakers and education leaders have said the new law would be largely compatible with the direction of education reforms in the state. These reforms are giving greater powers to local school districts, reducing the emphasis on standardized test scores in holding schools and students accountable, and moving away from top-down reforms coming from Washington.
Civil rights groups have previously said they worried that some states, left more on their own, will retreat from a commitment to closing the achievement gap, or the academic disparity between some minority groups, including Latinos and black students, and their higher-achieving white and Asian peers.
Here are some reforms proposed by the 37-member coalition in its letter to the U.S. Department of Education:
The U.S. Department of Education did not immediately respond to calls seeking comment on the coalition’s letter.
The coalition, through the letter, said, “We appreciate this chance to comment and look forward to many more opportunities to inform the implementation of this law at the federal, state and local level. The civil rights community is deeply invested in ensuring that this law is implemented in an inclusive way and that it drives towards equity.”
Legislation that would remove one of the last tests teachers are required to take to earn a credential in California passed the Senate Education Committee.
Part-time instructors, many who work for decades off the tenure track and at a lower pay rate, have been called “apprentices to nowhere.”
A bill to mandate use of the method will not advance in the Legislature this year in the face of teachers union opposition.
Nearly a third of the 930 districts statewide that reported data had a higher rate of chronic absenteeism in 2022-23 than the year before.
Comments (2)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
roger mills 8 years ago8 years ago
Might you add a link to the letter so that readers might read it and view the signatories?
Replies
Fermin Leal 8 years ago8 years ago
Roger, the link to the letter is embedded in the first sentence of the article. Here it is again. http://www.civilrights.org/advocacy/letters/2016/essa-comments.html?referrer
Thanks for your comment.