President Barack Obama will propose raising taxes on tobacco to fund his ambitious plan to provide preschool for every child, the New York Times reported Friday. Details of the proposed tax won’t be revealed until the president’s budget is released next week, but the article answers for the first time the question on advocates’ minds since the president floated free universal preschool during his State of the Union in January: How will he pay for it?

Californians shouldn’t find that idea too much of a surprise since voters here passed a tobacco tax in 1998 to pay for the First Five Commission, which works to improve child care options in the state. Of course, one downfall of the plan, which has already been seen in California, is that the added tax does contribute to a decline in smoking, and thus decreasing revenues. First Five California takes in nearly $42 million less than it did in 1999 and the commission expects its revenues to decline another $10 million by the 2014-2015 fiscal year.

Kris Perry, director of the national First Five Years Fund, which advocates for expanded early childhood programs, and the former director of First Five California, has already come out in favor of the president’s payment plan.

“This is a smart, no nonsense revenue source that will help grow our economy in the short and long-term, while also highlighting an important public health issue,” said Perry in a statement Friday.

Obama’s State of the Union promise to provide preschool for every child in America has been greeted with enthusiasm by preschool advocates and skepticism from critics who say inexpensive public programs do not live up to the documented results of the small high-quality preschool initiatives touted by the president.

 


Filed under: Early Learning, Obama Preschool, Quick Hits · Tags:

Comment Policy

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments.


EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. Ruben says:

    Please note that this is the same Kris Perry who:

    > was in charge of First 5 CA when it repeatedly permitted the illegal use of Prop 10 funds by transferring over $300 million to the state of CA (they have now admitted their wrongdoing).

    > refused to testify to a state audit committee about potential improprieties involving disappearing emails and potential misuse of funds.

    So yeah, we should all trust her, right? Not.

    See http://www.flopped5.org – a document driven watchdog website – to learn more about the lack of effectiveness that Kris Perry oversaw for some years.

    The laws that she now wants to implement at the federal level are likely to be the same sort of self dealing dysfunctional instruments primarily intended to create pensions paying jobs for adults.