College & Careers > Career Preparation

New scorecards show challenges for state's community colleges



Students who start community college prepared to take college-level courses have a better than 70 percent chance of earning a degree or certificate or transferring to a four-year college within six years. The outcome is significantly worse for students placed in remedial math or science, with barely 41 percent achieving those goals, according to the first-ever student success scorecards released Tuesday by the systemwide chancellor’s office.

2013 Statewide Student Success Scorecard.  Source:  California Community College Chancellor's Office.  (Click to enlarge).

2013 Statewide Student Success Scorecard. Source: California Community College Chancellor’s Office. (Click to enlarge).

The scorecards provide in-depth information for each of the state’s 112 community colleges including student demographics, completion rates, career technical education, and indicators of likely success, such as the percentage of students who completed 30 units after six years.

“The scorecard is probably a historic tool for the community colleges,” said Constance Carroll, chancellor of the San Diego Community College District, during a telephone call with reporters. “What is critically important about the scorecard is that the groups of students can be subdivided in almost any way so that very specific strategies can be used to insure their improvement.”

Boosting success rates is critical in the current economy, said state Community College Chancellor Brice Harris, because “by 2018, two-thirds of the jobs in California will require some level of education beyond high school.”

The scorecards grew out of the community college Student Success Task Force, whose 22 recommendations were approved by the systemwide Board of Governors last year. Several months later, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 1456, the Student Success Act of 2012, which, among other things, put the scorecards into statute.

Some of this data is already available; community colleges know their remediation rates and the consequences for students who have to spend several semesters just to catch up to college-level math or English.  But the scorecards provide more robust and refined data, said Harris, allowing schools to do deeper analyses.

“These data make it much clearer to the colleges and easier for us to get our arms around what the problems are, and we also think it’s going to help us in making a case to the Legislature and the public in general about the challenges that are faced by the students at our colleges,” Harris said.

At Kern Community College District, Chancellor Sandra Serrano said the data show that students who attend school part-time because they have to work are less likely to make it through college. That tells her that the district has to make it a priority to let students know about financial aid so they can encourage more of them to enroll full time.  “That is the benefit of having this kind of information that disaggregates information,” said Serrano.

Nancy Shulock, executive director of the Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Policy at Sacramento State University, who served on the Student Success Task Force, said the scorecard will give researchers, like herself, access to more information that could show “where students may get stalled and which students get stalled” on the path to earning a degree or certificate or transferring.

Though most of the data is public, the most detailed information containing the individual records used to create the metrics is only available to the campuses so they can do further and deeper analysis.  Shulock also said the transparency of the scorecards will help prospective students and their families consider which college to attend, but cautioned against using them to compare schools.  “There are vast differences across colleges in student preparation, income, etc., and it is not always meaningful or helpful to compare colleges that enroll very different student bodies,” Shulock explained.

Five-year community college completion rates.  Source:  California Community College Chancellor's Office.  (Click to enlarge).

Five-year community college completion rates. Source: California Community College Chancellor’s Office. (Click to enlarge).

Harris echoed that warning. The purpose isn’t to line up the colleges against each other, he said, but “for individual colleges to benchmark themselves and improve over time.

Results have been going in the opposite direction recently. A comparison of completion rates over five years from the 2002-2003 academic year to 2006-2007 (see chart), shows a decline for every subgroup broken out by gender, age, ethnicity, and race.  Harris said this should come as no surprise given that community colleges cut course offerings by about 20 percent after seeing budget cuts of nearly a billion dollars in recent years. “It’s no secret to anybody that these have been five of the most stressful years California community colleges have experienced in decades,” he said.

 

Filed under: Career Preparation, College & Careers, Community Colleges

Tags: , ,

Comments

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments. EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

4 Responses to “New scorecards show challenges for state's community colleges”

  1. CarolineSF said

    on April 10, 2013 at 9:11 am

    But is this BECAUSE we offer little to no career/vocational/tech education in high school, instead forcing all students into a college-track mode?

    “…two-thirds of the jobs in California will require some level of education beyond high school.”

    It’s common sense that students who struggled in K-12 school and thus need remedial classes are likely to struggle in college too. It’s also common sense that students who can’t afford to go to college can’t afford to stay in college. That’s why we need career/vocational/tech in high school rather than forcing all students into a college-track mode. (That’s how other developed nations do it.)

    • Kathryn Baron replied

      on April 15, 2013 at 11:45 am

      Caroline,

      The report cards do contain a section on CTE. Also, when officials talk about two-thirds of the jobs they are referring to all postsecondary education including certification in CTE fields.

  2. marty said

    on April 10, 2013 at 3:34 pm

    It is interesting that the college scores do not reflect the Accreditation status of the colleges. Many colleges on ACCJC sanctions score above the average in the state and above colleges that are fully accredited. This just demonstrates again that the ACCJC sanctions are not based on the quality of instruction or service to students but rather to the time and paperwork that a college puts into the writing of their self evaluation and their adherence to the micro-managing of the ACCJC.

  3. Frank Gaik said

    on May 15, 2013 at 1:32 pm

    If you want to see the miracle of the community colleges, notice this. The 41% who were not prepared but still graduated represent students whose high school teachers, counselors, and standardized tests judged as being non-college. In a brief year, perhaps three semesters, they were ready. That’s value added with a ribbon and bow!

Template last modified: