National response needed to protect children from gun violence

Louis Freedberg

Louis Freedberg

When will we ever learn?

Almost a quarter century ago, California experienced the horror of an elementary school massacre when five children were killed at Cleveland Elementary School in Stockton.

In that traumatic January 1989 event, barely remembered except among those whose lives were directly touched by the tragedy, Patrick Purdy, a so-called “drifter” with a long criminal record and a history of mental disturbance, entered the school grounds during recess and shot to death five children from Southeast Asian refugee families – Rathanar Or, 9; Ram Chun, 8; Sokhim An, 6; Oeun Lim, 8; and Thuy Tran, 6 – injured 29 others, and then killed himself.

Sound familiar?

The shootings triggered the usual outpouring of outrage – and the California Legislature actually responded. It passed the Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989, the first state-level law to ban the possession, sale and manufacture of a long list of assault weapons in California. It was signed into law by Republican Governor George Deukmejian.

Over the years, California has passed numerous other bills, and today it is the only state to get a 4-star rating for its gun control laws from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

Not surprisingly, the Roberti-Roos bill was challenged in court, resulting in a set of prohibitions that are exceedingly complex to follow, as a review of the California Department of Justice’s webpage shows, raising questions about its effectiveness. (For details on the Roberti-Roos legislation, go here.)

The DOJ site declares that as a result of the legislation “AK and AR-15 series weapons are unlawful for sale after August 16, 2000, even if their assault weapon characteristics are removed.”

Yet an online ad for a Sacramento gun shop with the chillingly coincidental name Newtown Firearms describes itself as ” Sacramento’s premiere AR-15 and tactical semi auto rifle dealer.” It shows that things are not as clear cut as state authorities claim. “If you are trying to buy an AR-15 in California, you have come to the right place,” the gun shop tells prospective customers. (In fact, the Internet is filled with sites like this one providing advice on how to get around California’s ban on the weapon.)

And despite California’s top ranking for its gun control laws, the state’s experience underscores the limited potential of states to protect children – and adults – from the deadly impact of firearms. Just this year, another deadly attack in an education institution occurred in Oakland when a former student at a small Korean Christian university killed seven people and injured three more.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, 138 children under the age of 18 were murdered in California in 2010, the last year for which figures have been compiled. Fourteen of those homicides were of children under the age of 12. Those figures don’t include the many more wounded as a result of intentional gunfire – or the 11,078 people of all ages killed nationally in 2010 by assailants wielding guns.

It is also notable that when it comes to efforts to regulate weaponry, Connecticut is not far behind California. Ranked 5th in the nation, it is one of only four states to get a 3-star rating from the Brady Center. Yet the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre took place there – in a school that had rigorous security measures in place, probably more than in most schools. As of this writing, reports say that Adam Lanza carried out his killings with weapons, including an AR-15 rifle, which appear to have been purchased legally – just as those used in the Stockton killings were in 1989.

Clearly what is needed is a national response, not a piecemeal state-by-state approach. Whatever is done has to go far beyond just reinstatement of the long-expired federal assault weapons ban that California Senator Dianne Feinstein is championing, although that would be a good start.

President Obama’s emotional speech in Newtown last night could well signal the start of a serious attempt to regulate weapons that can take the lives of 20 first graders in minutes. “We can’t tolerate this anymore,” he said. “The tragedies must end. And to end them, we must change.”

With two young children of his own, and ensconced in the White House for a second term, Obama must now make this a central cause of his presidency. So far, he has fallen terribly short on the issue.

Getting a 60-vote majority in the Senate, and majority support in the House of Representatives, for any meaningful reforms will be extraordinarily difficult. Teachers, PTAs and all others who work in our schools will have to come together to push Congress to approve legislation that creates safer environments for our children – and people of all ages.

“No single law, no set of laws can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society, but that can’t be an excuse for inaction,” President Obama said last night. “Surely we can do better than this.”

Surely we can. Whether we will is another question altogether.

Louis Freedberg is executive director of EdSource.

Filed under: Commentary, Discipline, Hot Topics, Reforms

Tags: , , ,


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment Policy

EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers.

  • To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective.
  • Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to.
  • EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and offensive comments.
  • EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.
  • Please limit comments to 250 words to prevent comment clutter; if you intend to say more please link out to a place that contains your full comment.
  • Comments with more than one link automatically enter moderation. Comments from new commenters are automatically moderated.
  • Repeated violation of this comment policy will lead to a warning. Continued violations will lead to a ban.

5 Responses to “National response needed to protect children from gun violence”

EdSource does not track who "likes or dislikes" a comment. We only track the number of likes and dislikes.

  1. An Involved Parent on Jan 8, 2013 at 5:43 pm01/8/2013 5:43 pm

    • 000

    One thing this piece did not address AT ALL – is the increasing hostile enviroment at some schools – the “Security Theatre” rather than real security. I’m not talking about hiring more police – but how about real answers…and that isn’t more background checks, locked gates and classroom doors, or making sure everyone on campus has “signed in” –

    I’m sick of the Theatre… about creating a warm, inviting school culture – being a real community where parents know each other, and the students in their kids classes….

    Guess I’m dreaming huh?

  2. el on Dec 17, 2012 at 12:51 pm12/17/2012 12:51 pm

    • 000

    I would just like mental health services to be available *at all*.

  3. JWM on Dec 17, 2012 at 10:48 am12/17/2012 10:48 am

    • 000

    Excellent piece! Your conclusion and challenge are absolutely correct. We need action.

  4. CarolineSF on Dec 17, 2012 at 9:55 am12/17/2012 9:55 am

    • 000

    One of the other questions is dealing with mental illness. The really tough issue is that doing that probably involves involuntary treatment and commitment. It would be really instructive to learn what the mental health care system looks like in developed nations that don’t have a constant string of massacres.


    • Henry on Dec 19, 2012 at 8:44 pm12/19/2012 8:44 pm

      • 000

      I would agree, The mental health care would give Americans a more instant fix to our problems. They can talk about guns all they want but there will still be a problem because criminals will find a way to either get a gun or make it themselves.
      Video games or TV is another fix, it may take a few years to see the benefits because the damage has been done to the children that have all ready participated in watching or playing with videos. But it would help.
      I really believe this problem is a multiple prong problem, some can be a quicker fix and others would not see the positive results till later. But by far fix the root of the problem MENTAL ILLNESS.

Template last modified: